-Caveat Lector-
Amelia wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> I am confused for here we have this post claiming massive
> intelligence failure and one just before it quoting Tenant
> predicting this so accurately as to be suspicious. Linda's post
> does prove that there was no intelligence failure and congress was
> warned but ignored it.
Even if this were true, and I doubt that it was, it would still
constitute a massive intelligence failure. There is always someone to
go to. They could have leaked to the media.
This was cause to get rid of CIA and the whole rotten system and rebuild
from the ground up. The CIA is obviously too busy overthrowing independent
countries which are not amenable to global capitalism to fulfill their
primary directive of protecting the country.
> There has been a movement under way by the
> likes of the Church Committee to decimate the intelligence
> agencies.
That was thirty years ago. But a new Church committee wouldn't hurt.
> We can't have it both ways. Either we want them or we
> do not. We cannot tie their hands with excessive regulations and
> continually cut funding and ignore what they tell us and then blame
> them and claim they failed. We have the weakened agencies we
> demanded.
What the hell kind of gibberish are you babbling about. The Intelligence
community is WAY over funded. And if that's not enough, they have their
private businesses to earn extra bucks. If you know what I mean.
>
> And how will we know when this attack is over for these same
> agencies have told that there are weapons already in place, also
> ignored. If they are used, guess tat will constitute another
> 'failure' but it is the failure of congress to listen and act upon
> the information they are given.
They couldn't get it together enough to protect the Pentagon. If you
can't understand the implication of this, take up a different hobby.
J2
>
> ~Amelia~
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
