Mike Cox wrote: > I searched the Guardian site for references to Bin Laden's appointment. I read >through headlines of all articles referencing Bin Laden which were published since >the beginning of August. I found no reference to his appointment. I would suspect the >letter writer faked the article, except for the fact that he doesn't write well >enough. I guess we'll find out eventually. > Mike Here's another copy. You can't find it by site search but it's in there for those who know the link. If I do a search for bin laden, I get the first page and there are supposed to be 191 hits, but next page gives Error 404. http://www.vny.com/cf/news/upidetail.cfm?QID=216037 I've been looking through those sites, and that's how I found out that Bin Laden had the approval of Taleban and Pak ISI to assassinate Masud. That's like assassinating General MacArthur and being rewarded instead of arrested. There's no need to locate a paper crown when the real authority is evident. For a foreigner to kill a local super hero and do it with Pak support at this point with US pressure on Pakistan is to say Pakistan regards Bin Laden as a Pak strategic weapon like their nukes. That, too, is not what US news is saying. The fireworks in Kabul Tuesday night were also about consolidating Bin Laden's base. I think we can assume he killed whoever he was going after there, too. Bin Laden's on a roll. -Bob ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> <FONT COLOR="#000099">FREE COLLEGE MONEY CLICK HERE to search 600,000 scholarships! </FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click Here!</B></A> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Please let us stay on topic and be civil. To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs -Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org OM Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
