-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/15/opinion/15RICH.html


The New York Times
September 15, 2001

JOURNAL: The Day Before Tuesday

By FRANK RICH


Being human, you first think of those you love. Then, if you are lucky
enough to find them safe, you grieve for those who are lost - their faces
still smiling out expectantly from downtown's new quilt of mass death, the
vast patchwork of fliers headlined MISSING.

Then you grieve for the city whose once indelible profile was mutilated,
just like that, on one beautiful September morning.

After that you think of your country, and another kind of shock sets in.
Something has been lost there too, but not all of what's gone may be a
cause for mourning.

We live in a different America today than we did only the day before
Tuesday. Yes, as it's incanted hourly, we have lost our untroubled freedom
of movement that we consider a birthright. We have lost our illusion of
impregnability. But beneath those visceral imperatives an entire culture
has been transformed. This week's nightmare, it's now clear, has awakened
us from a frivolous if not decadent decadelong dream, even as it dumps us
into an uncertain future we had never bargained for.

The dream was simple - that we could have it all without having to pay any
price, and that national suffering of almost any kind could be domesticated
into an experience of virtual terror akin to a theme park ride. The first
part of that dream had already started to collapse with the fall of the
stock market, the rise in unemployment and the evaporation of the surplus,
well before terrorists achieved the literal annihilation of the most
commanding edifice of American capitalism.

But the dream's second part was still going strong right until Tuesday. The
previously planned cover that People magazine scrapped that afternoon to
make way for the thousands dead was yet another story about shark attacks.
Never mind that the rate of shark attacks has been routine this year, and
that sharks are a statistically minuscule cause of mortality at any time.
(There have been at most two deaths in any year since 1990.) The great
shark scare of 2001 - already speeding to the dustbin of history, along
with such other summer ephemera as Gary Condit, Robert Blake and Lizzie
Grubman - was typical of an age in which we inflated troublesome but
passing crises into catastrophes that provided the illusion of a national
test of character, or some kind of moral equivalent of war, but in fact
were for most of us merely invitations to indulge in cost-free
hyperventilation.

>From the rampaging fears over school shootings following Columbine (at a
time when U.S. juvenile homicide rates were falling to a 33- year low) to
the protracted bellicosity surrounding Eli�n Gonz�lez to the California
blackout that didn't happen at the start of this summer, we've been looking
for a Pearl Harbor. But always a Pearl Harbor of few casualties - always a
Pearl Harbor that could readily be brought to "closure."

In our pop culture, this same impulse for vicarious, finite warfare could
be seen in the rise of TV reality programs like "Survivor," "Fear Factor"
and "Lost" in which we thrill to the spectacle of contestants competing in
war games - always with the understanding that no one is really going to
get hurt in a prime- time slice of "reality" that must move the sponsors'
products. On the day before Tuesday, after all, "survival," "fear" and
"lost" had different meanings than they did the day after.

Our desire for vicarious battle, the one commodity a stock market bubble
couldn't buy, also explains the fetishization of World War II. This week
everyone has been comparing Tuesday's events to Pearl Harbor, but only two
months ago Pearl Harbor had been sanitized as "Pearl Harbor." In that
Hollywood version of the attack, seen by countless teenagers who may now
have to fight an actual war, the enemy seems polite, the violence looks
like the digitalized carnage of video games, and a harrowing American
defeat gets an upbeat "victory" coda that minimizes and vastly shortens the
ensuing years of hardship, loss and heroism that were required for the
Allies to win a war.


At the high end of what I suspect is the now- defunct World War II craze is
HBO's brand new series, "Band of Brothers," whose relentlessly publicized
premiere preceded this week's tragedy. "There was a time when the world
asked ordinary men to do extraordinary things," went the ad copy, which
took pains to remind us that the miniseries was "based on the true story."
In a way, the pitch enshrines the complacency of the day before Tuesday,
with its assumption that the prospect of civilians having to make any kind
of extraordinary effort for a national good was as far in the past as the
knights of the Round Table.

That fat, daydreaming America is gone now, way gone - as spent as the
tax-rebate checks, as forgotten as the 2000 campaign's debate over
prescription-drug plans, as bankrupt as our dot-com fantasies of instant
millions, as vaporized as the faith that high-tech surveillance and
weaponry would keep us safe. The America that saw Disney's "Pearl Harbor"
is as far removed from the America that was attacked on Tuesday as the
America that listened to Orson Welles's "War of the Worlds" was from the
America attacked at Pearl Harbor. "Instead of the next big thing being some
new technological innovation or medical breakthrough," wrote David Rieff of
our post-Tuesday nation in The Los Angeles Times this week, "the next big
thing is likely to be fear."

For the America that is gone, the America that could have it all and feel
no pain beyond that on cable TV, George W. Bush was the perfect president.
We could have a big tax cut (or at least some of us could) along with
increases in spending for better schools and defense - and all without
having to dip into the Social Security stash. We could lick our energy
crisis - does anyone still remember the energy crisis? - while still
guzzling gas. Faith-based institutions would take care of the poor and
unfortunate. No serviceman would have to spend any more time in harm's way
than Mr. Bush (or most political leaders of his generation, regardless of
party) did during Vietnam.

Since Tuesday, there has been a towering leader in view - Rudolph
Giuliani - and, in a lucid and rational Colin Powell, potentially another.
The big-three network anchors have upheld pre-Drudge journalistic
standards, offering reportage rather than blather and rumor, doing their
part to steady a country that still gathers at the tube, not the computer
screen, at a time like this. In all this we've been blessed, for there were
48 hours during which the president was scarcely visible or articulate.

The country is rooting for Mr. Bush, as it must. We need him to become the
president of the America we have now. This means in part a U- turn in
style - more face time with his fellow citizens, less scripted rhetoric
from the alliterative phrasemakers who stick pretty words in his mouth (as
they did Tuesday night) that sound as if they were written by the same glib
stylists who gave him "home to the heartland" and "communities of
character."

But style is the easy part. What's more pressing are changes in content.
Many of his administration's previous policies are either irrelevant or
contrary to a war-bound nation's interests. Education and tax cuts are no
longer our top priority. The unilateralism the administration has practiced
in walking away from the Kyoto accord on global warming and the ABM treaty
is anathema to the building of an international coalition to fight a war.
Decisions that are "the most profound of our time" (as his handlers
described his stem-cell verdict) can no longer be dragged out with weeks of
self-aggrandizing spin.

But most of all, Mr. Bush will have to prepare the nation for something
many living Americans, him included, have never had to muster - sacrifice.
In his pronouncements thus far, the president has expressed sorrow and
vowed to "whip" evil, but surely he will soon have to prepare Americans to
give up far more in wartime than curbside check-in at the airport. Anyone w
ho lives in New York has seen this week how many Americans are prepared to
do this. That's the example our mayor and governor set, and it's the
example thousands of New Yorkers have followed with open hearts.

Though polls show that we overwhelmingly support the idea of going to war,
they don't indicate whether we understand that idea. The killers who
attacked us on Tuesday had an all too ruthless eye for appraising how
little we knew on Monday. We have no choice now but, as a horror- struck
Hamlet said after being visited by the ghost, to "wipe away all trivial
fond records" from the table of memory, and hope that our learning curve
will be steep.


Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company

================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

   FROM THE DESK OF:

           *Michael Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to