-Caveat Lector-

What Is Islam?

Its name implies peace, but it preaches Holy War - so what kind of
religion is it?

by Paul Vallely
20 September 2001

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=94977

It seems a long time now since the American political scientist Francis
Fukuyama announced the End of History. It was not long after the Berlin
Wall had fallen. The Cold War was over. Capitalism had triumphed. There
were to be no more conflicts, just the playing out of humankind's
increasing prosperity.

Even then there were sceptics. Another American theorist, Samuel
Huntington, pronounced that the great conflict of the 21st century would
in fact be played out along the fault line of the tectonic plates on which
Islamic and Western civilisation co-existed so uneasily. In the search for
a new enemy after the collapse of Communism, the alien dispensation of
Mohammedanism  to use a term which Muslims hate  appeared as promising a
candidate as any.

To non-Muslims, time has only seemed to give additional credence to the
notion. First there was the Rushdie affair which raised the spectre of
Islam as a threat to hard-won post-Enlightenment Western liberal values.
Then the expressions of support by some British Muslims for Saddam Hussein
during the Gulf war went further, creating the image of the UK's two
million Muslims as potential subversives  a deadly time bomb ticking in
our midst. And now Islamic fanatics have perpetrated the biggest terrorist
atrocity of modern times.

Extremists, terrorists, fanatics  the descriptions vary  but the constant
always is the adjective "Islamic" which precedes them. So is there
non-Muslims wonder  something fundamental about Islam which makes it
incompatible with Western values of democracy and freedom? Are Muslims
inevitably more likely to be, in the vocabulary of cosmic good and evil so
beloved of President Bush, "the bad guys"? Certainly one might think so
from the questions which one now hears being asked about Islam by nervous
observers of current events. Many are questions born of ignorance; but,
for that very reason, they are worth answering. Here are six of the most
common.

Why does Islam seem so confrontational, aggressive and intolerant?

The sword has always figured prominently in Islamic history. Christianity
may have been inaugurated by a man who seemingly failed in his worldly
agenda, but the seventh-century Arab who founded Islam, the Prophet
Muhammad, was a man who vanquished his enemies on the battlefield. In the
centuries which followed, military conquest was the means by which Islam
spread rapidly through the Middle East to Africa, Europe, the Indian
subcontinent, the Malay Peninsula, and China.

The traditions and law of Islam were thus formed during an era of success.
Programmed for victory, it has no theology for failure  or for being a
minority. This undoubtedly heightens the sense of humiliation Muslims feel
in an era of globalisation when Western power  cultural, economic and
military  is increasingly unchallenged. Having said that, for almost half
a millennium, under the Ottoman empire, the tone of Islam was one of
civilised consolidation.

It was also far more tolerant, of both Jews and Christians, than Christian
Europe ever was of its minorities. In the 11th and 12th centuries, Muslim
philosophy was the most sophisticated in the world. In Moorish Spain the
governing mood was one of co-operation. In the centuries after, the
attitude of Muslim conquerors to Hindus in India  moderated by the growth
of Sufism  was far less narrow-minded than is often claimed. It is only
with the growth of fundamentalism that the tone of intolerance has
heightened, and many modern Muslims insist that the new practices of
death-sentence fatwas and book-burning are unIslamic.

Why is Islam so inflexible?

Muslims believe that the Koran is the actual words of God, as dictated to
the Prophet Muhammad by the Angel Gabriel. As such, not only is its Arabic
language thought to be unsurpassed in purity and beauty (to imitate the
style of the Koran is a sacrilege) but it is also the infallible word of
God. That means that there is no room for the kind of interpretation
common in Christianity and Judaism which sees the Bible as the revelation
of God's purpose through the experiences, minds and pens of men. The Koran
cannot have been influenced by the circumstances under which it was
revealed. It can contain no mistake. And it cannot be mitigated by any new
discovery. What has been revealed by God is fixed and immutable.

In the three centuries which followed the Prophet's death, attempts were
allowed to interpret the Koran in the light of a changing world. The
practice was known as ijtihad. But by the end of the ninth century Islam
had been codified in legal manuals of The Shari'ah (The Way), a
comprehensive code of behaviour that embraces both private and public
activities. The "gates of ijtihad" were then closed. Islam became a rigid
and static system in which society could not shape or fashion the law, but
instead became controlled by it. The word islam means submission.

Some change has taken place. Several prominent Sunnite scholars, such as
Ibn Taymiah (1236- 1328) and Jalal ad-Din as-Suyuti (1445-1505), dared to
reopen the gates. And Shi'ite Muslims  a minority branch who split from
the Sunni majority in the seventh century and who predominate still in
Iran and parts of Iraq  believe that ijtihad is still allowed. But in
general, attempts by Sunni modernists toward the end of the 19th century
to reopen ijtihad to reconcile Islam with what they found valuable in
Western scientific traditions have not been widely pursued.

How does Islam justify the notion of Holy War?

There are five "Pillars of Islam"  practices which anchor the Muslim
community. They are: the profession of faith ("There is no god but God,
and Muhammad is his prophet"); five daily congregational prayers, with
bowing and prostration, preceded by ritual ablutions; zakat, an obligatory
charitable tax to provide for the needy; fasting during the month of
Ramadan; and to travel, at least once in their life, on the hajj, the
annual pilgrimage to Mecca. But to these some Muslims add a sixth pillar:
the jihad.

There is much debate in Islam as to what this Holy War means. All agree it
means "active struggle". Muhammad's followers in the early years took it
to mean military advance, not to enforce the conversion of individuals
the Koran forbids compulsion in religion  but to control the collective
affairs of societies to run them in accordance with the principles of
Islam. After the Muslim empire was established, however, the doctrine of
the jihad was modified. More spiritual interpretations took over. The
struggle became an internal one of moral struggle against temptation.

So where does the notion come from that suicide bombers go straight to
heaven?

There is nothing about this in the Koran. But Islam also has many books of
hadith  sayings which were attributed by others to the Prophet. It is here
that it is stated that martyrs, among the host of heaven, stand nearest
the throne of God. Tradition also provides other details about a paradise
of milk and honey with 72 beautiful virgins to every martyr. Yet many
modern Muslims dismiss these notions as Arab hyperbole. Taken in context,
they say, the practice is unIslamic. The Koran clearly states that "If
anyone murders an [innocent] person... it will be as if he had murdered
the whole of humanity." And Muhammad is recorded as saying that Muslim
rules of engagement forbid attacks on non-combatants, women, children and
men of religion; they outlaw attacks on the "means of subsistence" of
those who "offer no resistance". No miscreant should be given succour or
refuge by Muslims. Moreover there is a Koranic insistence that only God at
Judgement Day should punish. And there are many fatwas (the word merely
means Islamic legal judgment) which pronounce suicide to be illegitimate.

How can a British Muslim say, as one did this week, that his religion is
more important than his nationality?

Muslims believe they are bound by their common faith into a single
community  the umma  all of whom are "brothers unto each other". This
explains the particular solidarity Islam creates, regardless of national
boundaries. Nevertheless, most British Muslims insist that they can hold
their religious and national loyalties together without any sense of
conflict, though many feel that they get a rough deal as far as education,
housing and job opportunities are concerned. Which creates additional
tensions.

How can Islam, with its Barbaric code of criminal punishment and its
treatment of women, be reconciled to modern Western notions about human
rights?

The veil, the Taliban's refusal to allow women education or hospital
treatment, the widespread practice of female circumcision  all mean that
Islam is frequently accused of treating women as second-class citizens.
Muslim apologists suggest that these are cultural practices not religious
ones. But the Koran and hadith contain provisions which make a prima facie
case for misogyny  ruling that a woman's testimony is worth only half that
of a man, that her inheritance rights must be lesser, and that woman is to
be seen as Satan when a man is sexually tempted. And the Koran lays down
punishments regarded in the West as barbaric  cutting off the hands of
thieves and stoning adulterers to death. Yet many British Muslims,
including white women converts, insist that they have found embracing
Islam to be a liberating experience which has brought them inner peace. It
is a reconciliation which continues to mystify most non-Muslims.

Even so it is difficult to spend any time looking into Islam, and meeting
modern British Muslims, without concluding that often it is our questions
which tell us more about the problems we face than do their answers, even
where they fail entirely to convince. It is clear that much of our
contemporary secular mindset about Islam is about as accurate as an
assessment of Christianity were to be if we made it on the basis of the
rhetoric of the Rev Ian Paisley or the actions of the IRA in its terrible
heyday. The 1,000 Muslims who were reported to be among those who died in
last week's attacks on New York would doubtless tell us so, if only they
now could.

The issue, of course, is not Islam but fundamentalism  a tendency which is
as evident among Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and even Confucians.
Academics argue that it makes no sense to talk of Muslim fundamentalism
for if you don't believe that the Koran is literally the inspired word of
God, you're not a Muslim. But fundamentalists in all religions share
common characteristics beyond the fact that they interpret symbols
literally. All are highly selective in "the fundamentals" they chose to
return to, and in what part of modernity they accept. All take traditional
texts and use them out of context. All embrace some form of Manicheanism
seeing themselves as part of a cosmic struggle between good and evil in
which they have to find an opponent and demonise them. The danger in the
days in which we non-Muslims now find ourselves is that we too will
succumb to some of the same temptations.

If so, it may be that there is indeed a time-bomb ticking away at the
heart of our society. But it is ignorance of Islam that may prove to be
the deadliest thing we have to fear.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to