-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/24/01 9:31:40 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> THIS should set off everyone's alarms....
>
> So now we have a guy who at the very least was criminally negligent in
> leaving classified data regarding NYC security procedures available for
> anyone to read....and had to be responsible for the instructions to WTC
> occupants to NOT evacuate after the planes hit.
>
>
> June
Thank you for paying such close attention to this information. I thought
it was terribly important, as I searched last night and found one piece of
curious information after another. Oddly, I could not find mention of the
August 2001 investigation into O'Neill in the archives of The Tampa Tribune.
Because I am familiar with that part of Fla, it occurred to me to try The St.
Petersburg Times, and I found the article I posted. I wonder how many people
would know to try that route?
One way of interpreting this info re O'Neill is a terrible indictment
against him, yet I wonder if he may have, in fact, played the role of "patsy"
or "partial patsy." He is dead after all. The FBI agents who intimidated
witnesses after the JFK assassination probably foresaw grand careers in front
of them for cooperating with "the shadow government" - certainly not instant
death.
In a career otherwise full of accolades, in the last few months, O'Neill
got "bad boy" press twice - the first time in July 2001 (for being prohibited
from returning to Yemen) , and the second in August 2001 (for being negligent
with national security documents.) This leaves me to wonder if these events
were contrived in advance to cast suspicion on O'Neill later - possibly with
his cooperation....?
He may have played a deliberate role in the unfolding of the events on the
11th, but he may also have been sacrificed to scapegoat later - much like
Oswald. Oswald knew in advance about the impending assassination, but did he
know the role he was to play afterward? He was, in all likelihood, set up.
O'Neill may have been too. He may have been a good guy, or he may have been
a bad guy who was then surprisingly betrayed by his colleagues. In short, I
don't know WHAT to make of this information, other than it is highly
suspicious.
Samantha
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
