-Caveat Lector-

..............................................................

>From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]
Note:  We store 100's of related "New Paradigms Posts" at:
http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html

From: "All The News That Doesn't Fit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Saudi connections: Too Delicate to Touch?
Date: Saturday, October 20, 2001 11:51 PM


Saudi connections: Too Delicate to Touch?

the Independent - 18 October 2001

'Saudi connection' puts new strain on alliance

By Rupert Cornwell in Washington

Investigators are concentrating on a "Saudi connection" to the 11
September terrorist attacks on America, suggesting that part of the
conspiracy was hatched there - to the intense disquiet of Saudi
Arabia's ruling monarchy.

Relations were already queasy between America and the world's largest
oil exporter - which happens to be both Washington's most important
ally in the Gulf and the birthplace of Osama bin Laden.

American investigators soon discovered that up to 12 of the 19
hijackers of the four aircraft used that day entered America with
Saudi passports or with visas issued by US consulates in that
country. Since then more than 700 people have been questioned or
detained by the authorities in America in connection with the attacks
-among them an unspecified number of Saudi citizens.

Neither the Saudi embassy nor the Justice Department will say how
many of the suspects are Saudi: indeed, so little has been divulged,
and so minor are some of the charges on which the detainees are being
held that American civil rights groups are asking whether their
constitutional rights have been violated.

According to lawyers, two members of Saudi Arabia's ruling family
were detained for more than 20 days after being picked up at Denver
airport. They were released last week, but will still have to answer
for minor infringements of immigration laws.

The Saudi embassy has retained lawyers for all the suspects, The Wall
Street Journal reported this week, after personal instructions to
counsel from Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the veteran Saudi ambassador
in Washington, that "each and every one of them is to be helped as if
you have no other cases and nothing else to do". This vigorous stance
may be an admirable example of a country helping its citizens who
find themselves in difficulty on foreign soil. But it is bound to
raise fears in America that, as with the investigation into the
deadly 1996 attack on US barracks at Khobar, Saudi Arabia, the
kingdom might prove less than fully co-operative with US
investigators into a terrorist incident with which it is linked.

In the case of the 11 September attacks, pointers to such connections
continue to grow.

American investigators believe that several of the hijackers were
recruited by al-Qa'ida cells operating in Saudi Arabia itself. The
inquiry is focusing on the town of Abha in the south west of the
country, where four hijackers are believed to have originated. People
from this region have also been linked with the attack on the USS
Cole in Aden last October, in which 17 American sailors died.

These allegations, and others that Saudi-based charities and
companies have channelled finance to Mr bin Laden and his network,
have placed the kingdom on the defensive, and increased resentment of
America in Saudi Arabia -the very outcome that the Bush
administration is seeking to avoid.

In a television interview last month, Prince Bin Sultan, who has been
ambassador since 1983 and is very well connected to the White House,
acknowledged that some people in Saudi Arabia supported Mr bin Laden,
but said their numbers were few. "When you say 'so many' you have to
put it relatively," he told his questioner. "Relative to what? Are
there sixteen, twenty, one hundred?

"Bin Laden - what he represents, and people who preach like him or
support him - yes, they don't like my government. Yes, they don't
like my political system. But they don't like it for the wrong
reasons, not for the right reasons you think of. They want us to go
back 1,000 years. We want to move forward."

But these arguments have not stilled public criticism. A recent
editorial in The New York Times declared that the "deeply cynical and
cold-blooded bargain" at the heart of the Saudi-US relationship -
Saudi oil in exchange for American military protection -was in urgent
need of updating. "Decades of equivocation and Hobbesian calculations
have left US-Saudi relations in an untenable and unreliable state,"
the paper said. "These deformities must be addressed before they do
further damage to both nations."


=================================================================
  NY Transfer News Collective   *   A Service of Blythe Systems
           Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us
              339 Lafayette St., New York, NY 10012
  http://www.blythe.org                  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================================

nytact-10.21.01-01:04:30-19020


Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List,
not necessarily endorsed by:
***********************************

Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research a ruling
class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological
spectrum. **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **
   Explore Our Archive:  <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to