-Caveat Lector-
From
http://www.ahram.org.eg/weekly/2001/557/5war3.htm
}}}>Begin
Al-Ahram Weekly Online
25 - 31 October 2001
Issue No.557
Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875
Current issue | Previous issue | Site map
The Kashmir factor
India and Pakistan vie for US support for their positions on disputed
Kashmir. The result could well depend on the unfolding war in
Afghanistan. Iffat Malik writes from Islamabad
US Secretary of State Colin Powell headed out to South Asia on 14
October, planning to shore up support for the military action against
Osama Bin Laden's Al-Qa'ida network and the Taliban. But once there,
he found that plan sidelined by a flare- up in that other regional
conflict zone: Kashmir.
Heavy firing across the Line of Control (LOC) -- the boundary
dividing Indian and Pakistani- controlled areas of Kashmir - killed a
woman and left 35 injured. Coming after 10 months of border calm and
just before Colin Powell landed in Pakistan, the timing of this
latest escalation was surely no coincidence.
India and Pakistan have been quarrelling over the state of Jammu and
Kashmir since Partition in 1947. They have fought three wars over it,
as well as the Kargil conflict in 1999. Currently they each control
about half the state.
Since 1989, an internal armed separatist movement has also operated
within Indian-held Kashmir. India claims that the movement is
Pakistan- sponsored terrorism, while Pakistan maintains that it is a
wholly indigenous freedom struggle waged by Kashmiri Muslims, to
which it provides moral, political and diplomatic support.
As so often in Kashmir, the truth may lie somewhere in between.
Indian policies in Kashmir -- lack of political freedom, rigged
elections, denial of regional autonomy, throttled economic
development -- have fuelled a genuine desire for secession on the
part of Kashmiri Muslims. This has been strengthened by the human
rights abuses committed by Indian security forces as they have tried
to crush Kashmiri militancy. But there is little doubt that without
Pakistani funding, training, arms and other logistical support, the
Kashmiris would have found it far harder to fight New Delhi.
Efforts at resolving both the long-standing international dispute and the internal
ethnic conflict have always floundered. A big problem is the huge gulf between the two
sides' positions -- New Delhi says that Jammu and K
ashmir is an integral and permanent part of the Indian Union and Islamabad and the
Kashmiris demand that the people of the state should be given the right to decide
their own future. Add to this the weight of history (the
two sides have maintained their stances for 50 years) and weak governments in both
countries that lack the strength to make unpopular compromises, and the intractability
of the problem becomes plain.
For most of the 50-plus years that the Kashmir dispute has dragged, the international
community has remained aloof. Only when the Cold War turned hot did the outside world
get involved. In May 1998 both India and Pakistan
tested nuclear weapons. That development raised serious alarm. There were fears that
the next conflict over Kashmir could escalate into a nuclear exchange. So, when the
Kargil conflict broke out in 1999, Washington pres
sured for a quick end.
The latest flare-up in Kashmir has again raised alarm. At a time when Washington is
desperately trying to build international support for its campaign in Afghanistan,
especially from sensitive Muslim states, the last thin
g it wants is for India and Pakistan to go to war in Kashmir.
It especially does not want Pakistan, already battling domestic Islamist opposition to
President Musharraf's decision to support the US, to be distracted or destabilised (or
worse, both), by its eastern neighbour.
But it is precisely the war on terror, and the international attention focused on the
region, that have led India now to raise the profile of Kashmir. For New Delhi, this
is an excellent opportunity to win international s
upport for its claim that it, too, faces terrorism. A suicide bomb attack on the State
Legislative Assembly in Srinagar that killed 39 people three weeks ago was well used
by India to back its argument. The Indian governm
ent has been vigorously drawing parallels between the Taliban's harbouring of Bin
Laden and Pakistan's alleged harbouring of Kashmiri "terrorists."
Former Indian Prime Minister I K Gujral called on the US to broaden its campaign
beyond Afghanistan. "America must understand that you cannot have peace in Afghanistan
and terrorism in India, against India," he said, refe
rring to the Kashmir conflict. Other leaders have made similar statements. For its
part, Pakistan has denied Indian allegations and warned New Delhi that any offensive
will meet a strong response.
Since the 11 September attacks, the United States has been walking a diplomatic
tightrope in South Asia. Mindful of the risks President Musharraf has taken in
supporting America, it does not want to make life harder for h
im by applying pressure over Kashmir. But nor does it want to antagonise India, with
whom the US has been building good relations. So, while it froze the assets of two
Pakistan-based Kashmiri militant groups, overall the
US has been silent on Kashmir.
Pakistani officials were satisfied with Powell's statements during his visit to India,
in which he described Kashmir as "central to the relationship (between India and
Pakistan)" and said the dispute could "be resolved if
all parties engage with a willingness to address their concerns in mutually
acceptable ways." Pakistani officials said this statement endorsed Pakistan's position
that Kashmir is the core of the hostility between the two
states. India, in keeping with its position that Kashmir is an internal problem,
refutes this position.
No surprise, then, that when Powell landed in New Delhi, his next stop after
Islamabad, he got a frosty welcome. Powell tried to repair the damage by resorting to
semantic legerdemain (he had meant Kashmir was "a" central
issue, not "the" central issue). That argument failed to mollify the Indian
government, or defuse tension across the LOC.
There was more firing along the border on the nights subsequent to Powell's visit.
Indian Defence Minister George Fernandes warned that attacks against "infiltrators" on
the other side of the LOC could be stepped up. On 1
8 October, Pakistan put its forces on high alert, following troop movements on the
Indian side of the LOC and international border. The same day, Indian Prime Minister
Atal Bihar Vajpayee ruled out any resumption of peace
talks with Pakistan while it continued to make Kashmir the core of bilateral
relations.
The escalation in violence along the LOC, as well as within Indian-Kashmir, is a cause
for concern. But it is unlikely to lead to another military conflict now. Mindful of
international pressure, both governments will hee
d US President George Bush's call to "stand down" while the Afghan operation is under
way.
But once that operation is over, India will certainly seek international pressure to
stop Pakistan supporting separatist groups in Kashmir. Washington's response - when it
is no longer so dependent on Islamabad's cooperat
ion - is likely to be sympathetic. And that will mean more problems for beleaguered
Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf.
Recommend this page
Related stories:
Special coverage: War
War
18 - 24 October 2001
War
11 - 17 October 2001
Fall-out 4 - 10 October 2001
Fall-out
27 Sep. - 3 Oct. 2001
US Tragedy: The fall-out20 - 26 September 2001
US Attacked
13 - 19 September 2001
� Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
