-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 10/29/01 7:03:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< But we'd better scoot those oxen along double-quick, because the act -- one
 of the most remarkable instruments of liberty ever wrung from a government --
 is being cast into outer darkness by none other than that divinely appointed
 defender of "enduring freedom," George W. Bush. >>

How true.  The following story was in our paper this morning:

Bush further limits release of presidential records
by DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer

Washington--President Bush issued an order Thursday night that lets past
presidents, beginning with Ronald Reagan, have as much say as incumbent
presidents in keeping some of their White House papers private.

Advocates for government declassification said the executive order would
usher in a new era of government secrecy.  The White House says the order
simply sets up a procedure for implementing the Presidential Records Act,
giving former presidents more authority to claim executive privilege to
withhold certain papers.

"History has shown that former presidents release virtually all of their
documents and this executive order won't stand in the way of that," a White
House official said.

Some 68,000 pages of Reagan's White House records, including the vice
presidentail papers from President Bush's father were supposed to have been
opened in January, 12 years after Reagan left office, as provided by law.

But the White House delayed the release three times to review constitutional
and legal questions.

White House counsel, Alterto Gonzales, defended Bush's executive order
Thursday, but did not say when or if the Reagan papers would be opened to the
publlic.

Vanderbilt University historian Hugh Graham said the draft was a "real
monster," and complained, "They would reverse an act of Congress with an
executive order." Bruce Craig, director of the National Coordinating
Committee for the Promotion of History, said it was "blatantly unlawful top
to bottom."  He predicted a quick legal challenge.

The issue likely will come up at a hearing Tuesday by a House Government
Reform Committee panel, initially scheduled before the Sept. ll terrorist
attacks.

--------------

Amazing isn't it?  Especially when we all know that Republicans never have
anything to hide.  Dubya just doesn't want history cluttered up with all that
extra paper.  Prudy

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to