-Caveat Lector-

>From http://www.startribune.com/stories/561/815518.html

>>>Do the Israelis dislike "Oslo" because of its WW2 predelictions?
<<<

}}}>Begin

Editorial: The occupation / It's time for Israel to end it
Published Nov 12 2001
In June 1967, facing the threat of attack by three Arab neighbors,
Israel launched a preemptive strike and sent tanks rolling across its
borders into land that had been in Arab hands for years. Thus began
Israel's occupation of two zones known as the West Bank and the Gaza
Strip -- and the modern chapter of friction between Israelis and the
Palestinian residents of those territories.
It is time for that occupation to end. It humiliates and punishes the
3 million Palestinians who live under watch of Israeli tanks and
troops. It places young Israeli soldiers in constant peril. It puts
Palestinian and Israeli civilians in frequent and volatile contact,
with the result that magnificent biblical cities have turned into
bomb targets and shooting galleries. And, because of tight security
measures in recent years, it is slowly strangling the Palestinian
economy.
Under a peace framework negotiated at Oslo, Norway, in the early
1990s, Israel was to withdraw gradually from the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, at each step granting new autonomy to the Palestinians and
receiving new guarantees of order and security. That phased approach
is not working. Life for Palestinians has grown worse, not better,
leading them to believe that the Oslo process was a trick.
Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat has not delivered the security that
Israelis expected. Israel has continued to build new housing
settlements in occupied land to which it has no right, doubling the
Israeli population in Arab territory. The trust-building steps
envisioned in Oslo have instead turned into new rounds of suspicion
and recrimination.
Israel's withdrawal can't happen all at once; neither side is
prepared for the economic or security arrangements. But the United
States should insist that Israel stop expansion of the housing
settlements and begin dismantling them. The first Bush administration
did exactly that 10 years ago, using measured financial and political
pressure, and it was the right approach. A full Israeli withdrawal to
something like the 1967 borders is now under discussion among Israeli
and Palestinian intellectuals, and the United States should help that
happen safely and fairly.
Many Israelis insist on continuing the occupation so that their
troops can hunt down terrorists and their government can hold a
bargaining chip for future negotiations. But the military chokehold
on Palestinian cities is an ineffective way to stop terrorism.
Instead, it imposes collective punishment on innocent Palestinians
while fueling new extremist rage. As for future negotiations, the
ultimate goal should be a peace treaty between Israelis and
Palestinians, but Israel will still hold many, many cards when that
time comes.
Palestinians, too, are skeptical of unilateral Israeli withdrawal.
They want it to occur in the framework of negotiations over borders,
refugees and other issues. But the Palestinian Authority has very
little negotiating leverage at this point, and a lifting of the
Israeli occupation would be a great relief for average Palestinians
under almost any circumstances.
The Bush administration can't force Israel to end the occupation.
Israel is, after all, a democracy, and just this year it elected a
hawkish prime minister, Ariel Sharon, who is ill-disposed to
compromise with the Palestinians. But withdrawal should be the Bush
administration's message. The United States cannot continue being a
party to an occupation that is illegal under international law, that
brutalizes the Palestinian people and that stimulates further
terrorism against Israeli civilians. Continued military occupation
only spills more blood, deepens old wounds and prolongs a terrible
conflict.
Return to top
� Copyright 2001 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.
Related content Email this story Print this story
Search



More search options

End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to