--- Begin Message ---
ARON KAY
http://www.pieman.org
http://www.pieman.org/rottenrudy.htm
http://www.pieman.org/anti-bushlinks.html
http://www.pieman.org/bushthedope.jpg
http://www.pieman.org/pissonbush.html
DON'T LET AMERIKKKA BECOME A NATION OF SNITCHES
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joan Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:37 AM
Subject: THIS WAR HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR YEARS!
> Hi,
> I got this email a few weeks ago and have been checking it out. It's
> all true! We've had a strange feeling about so many coincidences, but
> couldn't prove anything till now.
>
> Peace,
>
> Joan Norman
>
>
> THIS "PIPELINE" WAR HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR THREE YEARS
>
>
> It's been three years since Congress discussed removing the government
> of Afghanistan to make way for an oil pipeline: (See the Hearing before
> the Sub-Commitee on Asia and the Pacific of the Commitee on
> International Relations of the House of Representatives, February 12,
> 1998.)
>
> It's been six months since the US Government told India there would be
> an invasion of Afghanistan in October: (See the Special Report in the
> Public Affairs Magazine: indiareacts.com called "India in anti-Taliban
> military plan", June 26, 2001)
>
> It's been five months since BBC heard about the planned invasion of
> Afghanistan: (See the BBC News' article by George Arney quoting Niaz
> Naik, former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, who was told by senior
> American officials in mid-July that military action would go ahead by
> the middle October, September 18, 2001.)
>
> It's been nine months since Jane's Defense News got word of the planned
> invasion of Afghanistan: (See artcle by Rahul Bedi called "India joins
> anti-Taliban coalition" March 15, 2001.)
>
> and of course, only three months since the attacks on the World Trade
> Towers that got the American people angered into support of the war that
> everybody on the planet BUT Americans had been told was on the way
> before September 11.
>
> During these last three months, the same American media that waved
> non-stop Gary Condit in front of our faces to keep us from finding out
> that plans for a war were being announced to other governments, is now
> trying to keep the level of fear in the American public so high that
> they cannot think.
>
> The media has been pounding us all non-stop with Osama (you know, the
> CIA's main asset in Afghanistan) in a fashion eerily similar to the
> mythical dictatorship's use of Emmanual Goldstein and the "Two Minute
> Hate" in George Orwell's "1984". The media's "scare-orrism" has
> continued with the endless dire warnings regarding the Anthrax being
> sent in letters, which in retrospect has to be the weakest form of
> Anthrax, having killed far fewer people in the entire nation in the last
> three months than are gunned down in Washington DC in any given week.
> But the problem with using fear to keep people from thinking is that
> sooner or later fear tires itself out. People habituate to it. They get
> used to it. And they start thinking again. And, as people stop fearing
> and start to think, they start to notice those things which the
> government would prefer they don't. Things like the convenient timing of
> the attacks on the World Trade Towers and the perfect fit into the
> timetable of the war announced to other nations earlier in the year.
> People are remembering that Osama bin Laden is a creation of the CIA,
> the same CIA once headed by the President's father (who also got us into
> a pointless war in the oil-rich regions of the middle east), the same
> CIA that imports drugs and sells them to our children, the same CIA now
> advocating the use of torture.
>
> People are remembering that the initial Anthrax "attack" on the US
> Congress occurred just as the draconian USA PATRIOT bill was about to be
> voted on. People have noticed that the US Congress, out of their own
> fear, voted to pass that bill without reading it at all!
>
> (The second congressional Anthrax attack was sent to Senate Judiciary
> Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) "coincidentally" right after
> he announced hearings on the military tribunals directive.)
>
> People are remembering that the first suspects to be arrested after the
> WTC attacks were not Arabs, but Israelis, and that Israelis (in one case
> a known Mossad agent) were also arrested inside the Mexican Congress
> carrying guns. Yet more suspected Mossad agents were arrested with plans
> for US Nuclear power plants inside the US, but were strangely let go!
> People are remembering that the Mossad has a past history of staging
> fake terror attacks to blame on a third party, such as the successful
> planting of fake radio traffic which tricked the US into bombing Libya,
> and a failed attempt to blow up a US facility and blame it on Arabs in
> 1956.
>
> Reports continue to circle in the foreign press blaming the Mossad for
> the WTC attacks. People are noticing that the US Government does not
> really have a case against Osama bin Laden having ANYTHING to do with
> the attacks on the World Trade Towers. After announcing the evidence
> would be made public, the US Government backtracked, and claimed that
> the evidence had to remain secret to protect "National Security". Then
> it turned out that what evidence existed was being destroyed by the NSA
> and by the FBI! While the only actual video tapes of Osama bin Laden
> mentioning the WTC attacks consist of denials, a report was recently
> published in the media that Osama had confessed and claimed to have
> nukes. Both claims turned out to be hoaxes; an effort to manufacture a
> phony confession to fill in the gap of any real evidence to justify the
> bombing of Afghani civilians. The video taped confession claimed to be
> the source of the transcript does not exist, and the BBC found no
> mention of nuclear weapons in the original version. Careful examination
> of what evidence has been presented shows it to be a total farce of
> unsubstantiated and non-court-worthy claims, circumstantial at best.
>
> And, as people stop being made blind by fear, they are starting to
> realize that bombing the innocents of Afghanistan makes no sense at all
> no matter what Osama bin Laden may have done, whether he still works for
> the CIA or not. After all, were American citizens able to prevent the
> CIA from killing 80 civilians, many of them children, with a car bomb in
> Beirut in 1985. Had the CIA knocked on the doors of American citizens
> and asked, "Is it okay if we blow up a bunch of kids to get at this one
> target", I feel safe in saying that most Americans would have replied
> that they didn't think it was a good idea (The intended target survived
> the CIA's bomb). Likewise, had Osama bin Laden knocked on the doors of
> the Afghani people and said, "Is it okay if we blow up a bunch of kids
> to get at this one target", I feel safe in saying that most Afghanis
> would have replied that they didn't think it was a good idea. Doubtless
> the response was more agreeable from Osama's pals at Langley.
>
> As people stop being made blind by fear, they are taking a closer look
> at the US Government's purported "humanitarian" effort to feed the
> starving people of Afghanistan, an effort exemplified by the shutting
> down of all truck routes into the region and the bombing (twice) of the
> Red Cross food warehouse, then lying about it afterwards. This has
> removed all sources of outside food for the starving people living along
> the proposed oil pipeline route except one' the food packages being
> dropped from American planes. But there is a problem with those food
> packages. Ignoring for a moment that most of those packages are either
> destroyed on hitting the ground or simply fall where they cannot be
> found, they happen to look like the unexploded munitions the US is also
> dropping all around Afghanistan. Same size, same color, same type face.
>
> Now, if you are a starving Afghani child, you cannot read English, and
> you have seen the leaflets that claim those yellow packages being
> dropped from the planes are a gift of food from the wonderful people of
> the United States, which package would you pick up? And if perchance you
> grab the wrong one and lose a hand, or your eyes, how will you feel
> about those wonderful people of the United States? This deception of
> having the unexploded bombs looking like the food packs is not aimed at
> Osama Bin Laden and it's not aimed at the Taliban; it is aimed at the
> non-combatant citizens of Afghanistan, including women and children, who
> are starving slowly to death because of the US-created REDUCTION in
> humanitarian aid to the region, and who out of that starvation won't
> hesitate to pick up an unexploded cluster munition, thinking it may be
> something to eat.
>
> But most of all, as the people of the United States cease to be afraid,
> they will realize that the greatest danger they face isn't Osama bin
> laden or starving Afghani women and children, but Presidents connected
> to oil companies who always seem to get us into wars in regions where
> oil happens to be, and who are willing to do anything, including
> destroying the civil protections of the Constitution and the Bill of
> Rights, to get that war and that oil.
>
> There are warning signs everywhere that the real agenda of the attacks
> on the WTC on 9/11 was to pave the way for a transformation of the
> United States into something no rational Americans would or could ever
> support. President Bush has done away with the civil protections
> mandated by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights by creating a new
> court system, outside the jurisdiction of the Constitution. Even more
> alarming is the strident and continuing calls for the use of torture on
> suspected terrorists coming from sources such as Allen Dershowitz, from
> the Los Angeles Times, and from that master of South American torture
> squads, the CIA.
>
> The problem is that while these secret courts and torture squads are
> supposed to be directed at terrorists, with "terrorists" being defined
> in the disengenuously named "USA PATRIOT" act as anyone critical of the
> government! So loose are the definitions being applied under the new
> laws that people are being denied their Constitutional right to travel
> freely based on political views or just for carrying the wrong book!
>
> So egregious has been the grab for dictatorial power by the Bush
> Presidency that even the normally obeisant and MOCKINGBIRD controlled
> mainstream US press is starting to express doubts, with the New York
> Times using words like "dictatorial", while MSNBC likens the present
> regime to that of a third world nation. Even > newspapers in Bush's home
> state are saying he has gone too far. Pravda, the major newspaper of the
> former USSR, once the most feared enemy of our freedoms, warns that
> America is losing her freedoms to her own government.
>
> Support for the war in Afghanistan is rapidly diminishing. Even the
> much-vaunted "coalition" intending to mask the ambitions of a single
> nation behind the illusion of multi lateral action, has started falling
> apart. What is an emerging dictatorship to do? The more people stop
> being afraid, the more they think. The more people think, the more they
> realize that something is very wrong with the official version of the
> WTC attacks. The more people think, the more they realize that something
> is very wrong with the convenient timing of the attacks with regard to
> the invasion of Afghanistan already planned and discussed with other
> nations last March.
>
> The more people think, the more they realize that something is very
> wrong with the manner in which the government is attacking the civil
> protections in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The more people
> think, the more they realize that something is very wrong with the
> demand for the use of torture on "terrorists" and the very loose
> definitions of what a terrorist is, able to be applied to anyone who
> disagrees with the policies of the state.
>
> In order to continue the grab for, as the New York Times describes it,
> "dictatorial" power, the government has to make the people STOP
> thinking. And the only way to make the people stop thinking is to make
> them afraid again, so afraid that they CANNOT think. Which is why I
> greatly fear that as we head into the holiday season, full of potent
> American symbols and media coverage of traditional holiday parades and
> celebrations, that opportunity exists for phony staged terrorist events,
> staged events designed to keep Americans afraid, keep them surrendering
> their civil rights, keep them in support of a war for oil, a war for the
> agenda to, as the current Fortune Magazine describes it, "break OPEC's
> grip". Sun Tzu, in "The Art Of War", comments that all war is based on
> deception. the people of an invading nation have to be deceived into
> thinking that they act in their own self defense; that they are the ones
> to have been attacked. The United States government has a long history
> of using such deceptions to start wars, from claiming that the USS
> Maine, sunk by a coal bin fire, was sunk by a Spanish mine, to the Gulf
> Of Tonkin and the torpedoes which never were, to Operation NORTHWOODS,
> in which the Joint Chiefs planned to stage fake terror attacks to
> manufacture American support for a war against Cuba.
>
> The present government of the United States NEEDS the American people
> to be afraid, to be blindly afraid, to react and respond, and not to
> reason. There is only one way for the government to achieve this,
> through a phony terror attack such as those planned by Operation
> NORTHWOODS, and I greatly fear that we will see one in the very near
> future.
>
> Because once a government resorts to terrorizing its own population to
> control them, it must keep on doing so. A government that uses terror to
> control its own population cannot ever stop using terror to control its
> own population, out of fear that a population no longer afraid will
> start to think clearly about what is going on. Terror has to become
> legal. Terror has to become accepted as necessary for domestic policy.
> Hence the call for torture, secret courts, and the abandonment of the
> protections of the Bill of Rights. Terror becomes an addiction to those
> governments who use it on their own people. Which is why I am certain we
> will see more of it.
>
> The fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were from Saudia Arabia,
> not Afghanistan, shows that the installation of a "puppet" government in
> Afghanistan, that will let Unocal and the other Bush/Cheney oil buddies,
> put the pipeline in.......is the real reason for this "war". The
> starving innocent people of Afghanistan don't matter at all.
>
>
> http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ifiwere.html
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Stop Smoking Now
Nicotrol will help
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/2vN8tD/_pSDAA/ySSFAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--- End Message ---
