-Caveat Lector- from: http://www.medialens.org/frameset.html ----- CLARIFYING THE VISION - welcome to medialens
Search for Search Wed Dec 12 07:33:19 2001 Media Lens is a response based on our conviction that mainstream newspapers and broadcasters provide a profoundly distorted picture of our world. We are convinced that the increasingly centralised, corporate nature of the media means that it acts as a de facto propaganda system for corporate and other establishment interests. The costs incurred as a result of this propaganda, in terms of human suffering and environmental degradation, are incalculable. In seeking to understand the basis and operation of this systematic distortion, we flatly reject all conspiracy theories and point instead to the inevitably corrupting effects of free market forces operating on and through media corporations seeking profit in a society dominated by corporate power. We reject the idea that journalists are generally guilty of self-censorship and conscious lying; we believe that the all-too-human tendency to self-deception accounts for their conviction that they are honest purveyors of uncompromised truth. We all have a tendency to believe what best suits our purpose - highly paid, highly privileged editors and journalists are no exception. Media Lens has grown out of our frustration with the unwillingness, or inability, of the mainstream media to tell the truth about the real causes and extent of many of the problems facing us, such as human rights abuses, poverty, pollution and climate change. Because much modern suffering is rooted in the unlimited greed of corporate profit-maximising - in the subordination of people and planet to profit - it seems to us to be a genuine tragedy that society has for so long been forced to rely on the corporate media for 'accurate' information. It seems clear to us that quite obvious conflicts of interest mean it is all but impossible for the media to provide this information. We did not expect the Soviet Communist Party's newspaper Pravda to tell the truth about the Communist Party, why should we expect the corporate press to tell the truth about corporate power? We believe that media 'neutrality' is a deception that often serves to hide systematic pro-corporate bias. 'Neutrality' most often involves 'impartially' reporting dominant establishment views, while ignoring all non-establishment views. In reality it is not possible for journalists to be neutral - regardless of whether we do or do not overtly give our personal opinion, that opinion is always reflected in the facts we choose to highlight or ignore. While we seek to correct corporate distortions as honestly as possible, our concern is not to affect some spurious 'objectivity' but to engage with the world to do whatever we can to reduce suffering and to resist the forces that seek to subordinate human well-being to profit. We do not believe that passively observing human misery without attempting to intervene constitutes 'neutrality'. We do not believe that 'neutrality' can ever be deemed more important than doing all in our power to help others. We accept the Buddhist assertion that while greed and hatred distort reason, compassion empowers it. Our aim is to increase rational awareness, critical thought and compassion, and to decrease greed, hatred and ignorance. Our goal is not at all to attack, insult or anger individual editors or journalists but to highlight significant examples of the systemic distortion that is facilitating appalling crimes against humanity: the failure to communicate the truth of exactly who is responsible for the slaughter of 500,000 Iraqi children under five; the silence surrounding the motives and devastating consequences of corporate obstruction of action on climate change; the true nature, motives and consequences of 'globalisation'; the corporate degradation and distortion of democratic society and culture. Our hope is that by so doing we can help all of us to free ourselves from delusions. In the age of global warming and globalised exploitation these delusions threaten an extraordinary, and perhaps terminal, disaster - they should not be allowed to go unchallenged. We have to acknowledge the debt we owe to Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky, and in particular to their brilliant (and largely ignored) text, 'Manufacturing Consent - The Political Economy of the Mass Media'. (Pantheon, 1988) We recommend Herman and Chomsky's "propaganda model of media control" as a basis for understanding the manner in which truth is filtered from, rather than consciously obstructed by, the modern media system. We hope that this website will help to turn bystanders into compassionate actors. As historian Howard Zinn has written: "Society has varying and conflicting interests; what is called objectivity is the disguise of one of these interests - that of neutrality. But neutrality is a fiction in an unneutral world. There are victims, there are executioners, and there are bystanders... and the 'objectivity' of the bystander calls for inaction while other heads fall." ARTICLES SUBJECT INDEX * biotechnology * climate change * direct action * globalisation * imperialism * interviews * iraq * media * nuclear power * philosophy * star wars * terrorism "Establishment of Media Lens is a welcome development. Regular media monitoring by FAIR and other organizations in the US has provided an invaluable service for people who seek to understand the world, and for media professionals who value critical reaction. Expansion of such projects elsewhere should have the same salutary effects, while also providing an important comparative perspective that should facilitate inquiry into the nature and functioning of ideological institutions of the state capitalist democracies." Noam Chomsky "The advent of Media Lens is long overdue in Britain. For many years, the public were encouraged to think of journalism as they would brain surgery - unfathomable and best left to the 'experts'. Increasingly these days, people no longer accept that. They are asking those of us in the media why certain assumptions are accepted as if they are divine truth, why so much human experience all over the world is not regarded as newsworthy, why establishment bias is dressed up as 'objectivity' and 'balanced', why ideology is represented as economic necessity, why the rapacity of 'our side' in war is ignored or minimised. The public deserve more than defensiveness in reply. They have a right to thoughtful analysis of a media claiming to be free. Congratulations to the founders of Media Lens for such a worthwhile project." John Pilger "The British media is feebly regulated and poorly scrutinised. Journalists appear to be deeply uncomfortable about attacking other parts of the industry, partly because this limits (as I have found to my cost) their future employment options. As a result people rarely see how the media works, why it ignores so many crucial aspects of public life and concentrates on such trivial ones, and who it is attempting to appease. So thank goodness for this brilliant project and the courage which has inspired it." George Monbiot "There are three ways to deal with mainstream media if one seeks truth and worthy social impact. Create alternatives that operate by entirely different norms. Push the mainstream by challenging its work on many levels and with diverse tactics. Enter the mainstream, and carve out room to do something worthy even against its logic and pressures. Medialens seems hell bent and perfectly conceived to do two of these as a priority, being, in itself, an alternative media institution with worthy values and methods, and utilizing its energies and talents to reveal truths about and to put pressure on the mainstream. I suspect medialens will also provide sustenance for those in the mainstream trying to do good work there. Three for three gets my full support, and should get the same from anyone concerned with attaining more justice in England and around the world!" Michael Albert, Z Magazine "A website such as yours which aims to sustain a radical critique of the mainstream media - so exposing their propaganda bias, lies, hypocrisy, omissions and subservience to the power elite - is desperately needed." Richard Keeble, Senior Lecturer, City University, author of Ethics for Journalists and Newspaper Handbook ----- Aloha, He'Ping, Om, Shalom, Salaam. Em Hotep, Peace Be, All My Relations. Omnia Bona Bonis, Adieu, Adios, Aloha. Amen. Roads End <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
