-Caveat Lector-

Published on Wednesday, December 19, 2001 by the
Associated Press

Bush Administration Wants To Build New Nuclear Bomb
Critics Charge 'Dirty' Bomb Would Send Wrong Signals
by H. Josef Hebert

WASHINGTON �� Defense officials are considering the
possibility of developing a low-yield nuclear device
that would be able to destroy deeply buried stockpiles
of chemical or biological weapons.
Such a move would require Congress to lift a 1994 ban
on designing new nuclear warheads.

In a report to Congress, the Defense Department argues
that conventional weapons, while effective for many
underground enemy targets, would be unable to destroy
the most deeply protected facilities containing
biological or chemical agents.

In recent years there has been a growing unease that
terror groups or unfriendly, newly nuclear-capable
states may be hiding weapons of mass destruction,
including chemical and biological weapons, in deep
underground facilities.

In the report sent to Congress in October, the Defense
Department said a low-yield, less than five-kiloton,
nuclear warhead coupled with new technology that
allows bombs to penetrate deep underground before
exploding could prove effective in destroying
biological and chemical agents.

Although not formally engaged in developing a new
warhead design, nuclear scientists "have completed
initial studies on how existing nuclear weapons can be
modified" for use to destroy deeply buried targets
containing chemical or biological weapons, the report
said. Studies include "synergies of nuclear weapons
yield, penetration, accuracy and tactics," it said.

Conventional weapons cannot destroy the most deeply
buried chemical and biological holding facilities, the
report concludes, but a low-yield nuclear device could
do the job. It notes that the current nuclear arsenal
was "not designed with this mission in mind."

The report was submitted in response to a
congressional directive that the Pentagon report what
it was doing to develop ways to attack stores of
chemical and biological weapons and also contains
updates on a number of programs involving conventional
weapons.

The report shows the Bush administration views a
nuclear strike as "an intrinsic part" of dealing with
deeply entombed enemy targets and "is essentially
doing all the preparation" for a future full-scale
research and development program for a new
mini-nuclear warhead, said Martin Butcher, director of
security programs at the Physicians for Social
Responsibility.

This kind of warhead is "the dirtiest kind of all.
It's highly radioactive," said Butcher, whose group
has been a leading voice in the nuclear
nonproliferation debate. Development of such a bomb
would send the wrong signals and would add to the risk
of nuclear proliferation, he said.

A low-yield nuclear weapon generally is considered to
be no more than five kilotons. By comparison, the two
atomic bombs dropped on Japan at the end of World War
II were about 15 kilotons each.

The report sent to key committees in Congress by
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld in October
provides a general outline of U.S. capabilities for
dealing with what defense officials believe is a
growing gap in U.S. military response.

The House International Relations Committee is
pressing for renewed U.N. inspections in Iraq on the
belief that it has rebuilt its nuclear, biological and
chemical weapons programs since President Saddam
Hussein's government stopped allowing inspections in
1998.

Notes and diagrams found in houses vacated by al-Qaida
fighters in Afghanistan also point to an effort to
create weapons of mass destruction.

The report said enhancements expected to be completed
by 2005 to an array of conventional weapons, including
laser-guided bombs and cruise missiles, should be able
to destroy most underground facilities. But it
maintains such weapons cannot penetrate the deepest
facilities.

The report acknowledges that any decision to proceed
with a nuclear device for attacking underground
targets would be considered within the
administration's broader plans for the nuclear
stockpile and overall nuclear weapons policy.

It said a joint nuclear-planning board already has
been established to examine the use of nuclear weapons
as bunker-busters.

The idea of using low-yield nuclear warheads to attack
deeply buried enemy targets has been discussed for
years. It was the subject of a classified study
concluded in 1997 and has been frequently discussed by
nuclear weapons scientists at the Los Alamos and
Sandia national laboratories.

The essence of the report sent to Congress was
reported Tuesday by The Albuquerque Journal. A copy
was distributed by Nuclear Watch of New Mexico, based
in Santa Fe, on its Web site.

The report had been requested by Sens. John Warner,
R-Va., and Wayne Allard, R-Colo., and was part of this
year's defense authorization legislation.

On the Net: Nuclear Watch of New Mexico:
www.nukewatch.org

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/1219-04.htm

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to