-Caveat Lector- > "You must give the person who is giving consent all the relevant > information so they can make a wise decision whether to take the > experimental drug," she said.
>>>Now, I know nothing except what I read in the news or in commentaries. However, I was one who MIGHT have been induced to take this vaccine under former Sec'y of Offense Cohen's program, the same program -- I might add -- that has caused some to be considered for courts martial for declining the shots and others to resign from otherwise promising careers the military to avoid further conflicts of any kind. But now we have the Congress and the Postal workers being "offered" this vaccine as an option, the same vaccine from the same heretofore FDA UNapproved BioPort company. For some reason, the Postals don't like being used as Guinea pigs. So goes my introduction. Here's my rationale for the anthrattax, solely based on events as they have unfolded in the media: ** The military was originally chosen to test the vaccine, with Willie Cohen leading the charge, his one contribution to and participation in the requirements of military service. ** Some of those who were needle and vaccine pokers or pokees became somewhat enraged by their complicity as Guinea pigs. ** Coincidental to the 9-11 extreme vandalism events, someone in the system decided that it was time to heighten the nation's sensitivity and awareness to the issue of misuse of vaccine and military personnel for medical (aux Nazis) experimentation. ** Ergo, the lettres were sent to members of Congress, realising that the "cure" (Cipro-cating) would be short term, with the only supposed long-term "cure" would be the vaccination. ** Knowing that the vaccine was still an unapproved, experimental substance, the onus was now on Congress to either accept or decline it as a course of treatment or prophylaxis. ** Now, Congress has issued a delay on inoculations due to the risks of the vaccine. Note the next statement provides only part of the story. > On Capitol Hill yesterday, inoculation of congressional workers was > postponed a day because federal officials had not completed the > necessary consent forms laying out the risks associated with taking a > vaccine that has not been approved as a post-exposure treatment. I could be wrong but in any event, Have A Nice Day (HAND). A<>E<>R >From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3541- 2001Dec19.html }}}>Begin Anthrax Vaccine Plan Sows Confusion D.C. Advises Workers Against Treatment By Ceci Connolly and Avram Goldstein Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, December 20, 2001; Page A01 Postal workers expressed frustration and confusion yesterday over the federal government's plan to offer them anthrax vaccine on an experimental basis, complaining they do not have the medical information to make such a difficult decision. Even as the Bush administration scrambled to meet the legal requirements of such an unprecedented proposal, lawmakers and local officials reacted bitterly to the lack of guidance they were receiving eight weeks after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began formulating the plan. "First it was Cipro; then it was the other pill. Now it's this," said Willard Tucker, an employee at the Brentwood postal facility. "Why do we have to be guinea pigs for them? They don't even know what's going on." Adding to the confusion, Mayor Anthony A. Williams said in a statement released last night that District officials were advising against vaccination and recommending that workers contact the CDC. "After discussing this issue at several scientific meetings, and the careful review of the scientific data, and absent a recommendation from the CDC, the District . . . affirms its previous public health advisory which recommends strict compliance with the 60-day course of antibiotics," the statement said. "As such the District Department of Health does not recommend investigational post-exposure prophylactics with anthrax vaccine at this time." "No one has recommended the vaccination yet. We're not ready to do so," said District Health Director Ivan C.A. Walks. He met with postal workers for about two hours last night and told them of the mayor's recommendation. Antoine Barry, 40, a letter carrier at the Friendship Station post office, said he felt more confident about not taking the vaccine after hearing Walks speak. "My concerns were basically just 'Am I safe?' " he said. "We're just handling this one day at a time. I feel a little better now. I feel like I know a little more about what's going on." Postal workers in New Jersey, still waiting to be contacted by federal officials, said they are relying on news reports for guidance. "We don't know how to protect ourselves," said Dianne Fazekas, who worked beside two co-workers at a Hamilton, N.J., postal facility who contracted inhalational anthrax. "We read in the paper that the spores can reactivate themselves after we stop the medicine. We also read that the vaccine has problems and we'd have to sign a release if we take it. Nobody knows what to think." On Capitol Hill yesterday, inoculation of congressional workers was postponed a day because federal officials had not completed the necessary consent forms laying out the risks associated with taking a vaccine that has not been approved as a post-exposure treatment. At the same time, inspectors from the Food and Drug Administration gave a partial endorsement to the vaccine maker, BioPort Corp., after conducting an evaluation at the plant in Lansing, Mich., as part of the company's efforts to win final approval for the vaccine. The FDA made seven "observations," issues that BioPort must address, said Kathyrn Zoon, the agency's top vaccine evaluator. Many of those issues were addressed while inspectors were at the facility, she said, such as the company's procedures and rules. But it was the fresh wave of uncertainty that dominated discussions in post offices, a conversation that was often tinged with an element of race and resentment over how postal workers were treated during the anthrax attacks. "We've been pushed to the side and that frustrates me," said George Bryant, who said he has felt from the start that postal workers have been treated differently from congressional aides. "I think they know more than they 're telling us. I'm really scared. I just want to know what's going on." Bailus Walker, a professor of public health and health policy at Howard University, said the government's handling of the anthrax attacks has only reinforced long-held suspicions. "There is a long-standing, deeply ingrained concern in the black community about being used as guinea pigs," he said. "As much as we try, we have not been able to remove from the minds of the black community the Tuskegee episode. . . . We confront it almost monthly as we try to get blacks to participate in clinical trials. This just feeds it." Tuskegee refers to a notorious federal study in which treatment was withheld for 40 years from h undreds of poor black sharecroppers with syphilis. On Tuesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson announced that the anthrax vaccine would be made available to about 3,000 people on the East Coast who may have been exposed to spores. The decision was pr ompted by concerns that the spores may survive longer in the lungs than had been thought and could still make people sick once their 60-day courses of antibiotics end. In the announcement, Thompson did not make a recommendation on who should receive the vaccine but said individuals could opt instead to take antibiotics for an additional 40 days or simply monitor their health and watch f or symptoms of anthrax disease. "It appears that once again federal officials do not have a comprehensive plan of action," said Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.), recalling the confusion that arose when 1,000 postal workers were told one Friday afterno on in October to get antibiotics to protect against anthrax. "In the first go-round we tried to exercise some patience as the experts found their way. This time there is no excuse." Last night CDC Director Jeffrey P. Koplan offered some insight on who should consider receiving the three-shot vaccine regimen. They include individuals who were in proximity to tainted mail, such as the 70 people in and near Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle's Hart Building offices, anyone who had contact with one of the five people who died of inhalational anthrax and anyone who was in an area that was "heavily contaminated" with anthrax bacteria, such as the Brentwood and Hamilton postal facilities, he said. "Those are the individuals at higher risk who may want to consider these more aggressive options," he said in an interview. Yet one day after Thompson announced his decision, it was clear many critical aspects of the plan remained unresolved or strayed from standard practice. Although anthrax vaccine has been licensed in the past for inoculating high-risk groups such as soldiers, it has never been used as a treatment for people who may have been exposed to the bacteria. Because of that, the CD C must submit a detailed request outlining why and how it will conduct the treatment. This is known as an investigational new drug (IND) program. "INDs are used when you are experimenting on people," said Mary Pendergast, former deputy commissioner of the FDA. Two key documents, she said, are the scientific protocol and the consent form that all participants must sign. Both must be approved by independent panels concerned with the safety of patients. "You must give the person who is giving consent all the relevant information so they can make a wise decision whether to take the experimental drug," she said. Koplan said the agency's institutional review board was still revising the consent form and the scientific protocol last night. Prominent physicians, meanwhile, disagreed publicly over what patients should do. Capitol physician John Eisold, in an e-mail to congressional workers, said that while federal officials remained neutral, he was recommending the vaccine for about 70 people exposed to an anthrax- laden letter sent to Daschle (D-S.D.). "If the federal government leaned toward Eisold and said we really should be giving it and recommending it, the other people would say, 'Why are you doing that? Why are you exposing us to risk?' " said Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. "If you lean the other way, the Eisold people would say, 'Wait a minute -- we want it.' " Staff writers Andrew Demillo and Dale Russakoff in New Jersey contributed to this report. � 2001 The Washington Post Company End<{{{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller, German Writer (1759-1805) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut." --- Ernest Hemingway <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
