-Caveat Lector-
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : North America
The New York Times and the case of John Walker
By David Walsh
22 December 2001
Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author
The New York Times� editors have brought the full breadth of their
cynicism and inhumanity to bear on the case of John Walker Lindh, the
20-year-old American citizen captured fighting with the Taliban
forces in Afghanistan.
In a December 21 editorial (�The American Prisoner�), the Times
solidarizes itself with the reported decision by the Justice
Department to charge Walker with �aiding a terrorist organization,� a
crime punishable by life imprisonment, rather than treason. That
�sounds about right,� declares the voice of American liberalism. (It
should be noted, however, that George Bush, at a Friday press
conference referred to Walker as an �Al Qaeda fighter� and refused to
rule out treason charges.)
One ought to consider, in the first place, the matter of the timing of the Times�
editorial. Walker was arrested in Mazar-i-Sharif in early December. He was thereupon
interrogated by CIA agents, an episode captured on vid
eotape, during which he was taunted and threatened with death. Walker survived the
subsequent massacre carried out by Northern Alliance and US forces at Jala-i-Qanghi
prison, at one point standing in freezing water in a c
ellar for perhaps 20 hours. The video of his interview with CNN shows a young man
filthy, wounded and seemingly half-dead.
Walker was then spirited away by US military forces to a troop ship, the USS Pelilieu,
in the Arabian Sea off the coast of Pakistan, where he has been held incommunicado for
more than two weeks. US officials have refused
a lawyer hired by Walker�s parents, James Brosnahan of San Francisco, access to the
young man. Brosnahan issued a brief statement this week protesting the American
government decision not to allow Walker�s parents permiss
ion to meet with their son and suggesting that Walker had an immediate right to
counsel. �He has now been held in custody and reportedly subject to ongoing
interrogations by various government agents for 16 days without a
ny access to an attorney and without the ability to communicate with his family,�
Brosnahan said.
Far from raising the question of Walker�s democratic rights, the Times essentially
intervenes to further poison public opinion against Walker under conditions in which
virtually nothing is known about his case, nothing ha
s been proven against him and the full force of the state, armed to the teeth and in
unrestrained military mode, is bearing down upon him�a 20-year- old who has seen
things that no 20-year-old should have to see. In this
the �liberals� at the Times demonstrate a horrifying callousness.
The Bush administration is in a genuine crisis as to what charges to pursue against
Walker. This is extremely murky territory. What legal grounds are there for indicting
him for treason? Walker wasn�t involved in the Sept
ember 11 attack, nor was he any kind of decision-maker in the Taliban regime. He
traveled to Afghanistan last May, when the US was not at war with the Taliban. Indeed
no declaration of war has ever been voted upon by Cong
ress. Walker didn�t �take up arms� against the US, the US took up arms, bombed and
invaded Afghanistan.
As far as �aiding a terrorist organization� goes, the Times would do better to look
closer to home. Let us recall once again, the Taliban regime and Islamic
fundamentalism more generally are the products, in the final ana
lysis, of America�s tragic two-decade-long encounter with Afghanistan. Under the
Carter, Reagan and Bush regimes, the US, as a matter of policy, cultivated and incited
Islamic fundamentalism as an instrument of the Cold W
ar against the former USSR. This has had the most dire consequences for the Afghan and
Pakistani peoples, in particular, as well as for the several thousand innocents who
died at the World Trade Center September 11. The e
ntire cast of characters currently vilified in the American media, Osama bin Laden,
Mullah Mohammed Omar and the rest, rose to prominence as the result of US government
policy.
In March 1985 President Ronald Reagan declared, referring to the Soviet Union:
�Throughout the world ... its agents, client states and satellites are on the
defensive�on the moral defensive, the intellectual defensive, an
d the political and economic defensive. Freedom movements arise and assert themselves.
They�re doing so on almost every continent populated by man�in the hills of
Afghanistan, in Angola, in Kampuchea, in Central America .
.. [They are] freedom fighters.� Yesterday�s �freedom fighter� is today�s �evildoer,�
such is the cynicism of Washington�s realpolitik.
In addition, there are the long-standing relations between the US government and
corporate elite, particularly in big oil, and the Saudi establishment. This
semi-feudal theocratic despotism, which produced bin Laden among
others, has been propped up by the US for more than half a century at the expense of
its own population and that of the region. The specific relations between the Bush
family (as well as other members of the Bush senior
inner circle, such as James Baker and Frank Carlucci)�through the Carlyle Group�and
the Saudis and bin Laden family, are equally well documented. It is also a matter of
public record that the FBI helped a number of the bi
n Ladens leave the US following the September 11 attack on a chartered 727.
Furthermore, the American role in helping consolidate the Taliban�s grip on power
would be the worthy subject of a full-scale public inquiry, although not one which
would receive the warm support of the Times or any other
segment of the US media and political establishment. It is a fact of history that an
official of the US oil company, Unocal, informed news agencies in September 1996 that
an oil pipeline project would be easier to implem
ent now that the Taliban had captured Kabul. It is also a fact that within hours of
the Taliban�s conquest of Kabul, the US State Department announced it would establish
diplomatic relations with the new regime (an announ
cement it later retracted).
The Times, in its December 21 editorial, pontificates about the �serious mistakes�
Walker has committed, for which he �will have to face the legal consequences.� Who
else will have to face such consequences? When it comes
to �aiding a terrorist organization,� the Times might look to official Washington and
find a host of possible suspects: Carter, Brzezinski, Kissinger, Bush Sr., etc. There
are people in and around the present Bush admini
stration who have far more experience with the Taliban, who are more familiar with its
inner workings and crimes and who, one might also hazard a guess, know a good deal
more about September 11 than John Walker.
The Times� contribution to an understanding of Walker�s personal evolution is to heap
insults on the imprisoned youth. It refers to �the appalling weight of what this
20-year-old doesn�t know� and asserts that his quest f
or enlightenment �has been coupled with unspeakable ignorance from the beginning.�
Such language might be more appropriately applied to the current resident of the White
House.
Based on the little one knows, the Walker case resounds with tragedy that has a
sociological and historical significance. Walker�s fate speaks to the more generalized
American experience, and specifically to the experienc
e of his generation.
Everything we know about him suggests that Walker was an exceptional young person and
an idealist. �He wanted something pure, and he was definitely questing at an early
age,� his father, Frank Lindh, told the San Francisc
o Chronicle. �We encouraged him to look.�
>From the start, however, his search seems to have been disoriented and confused,
>veering off into religious obscurantism. His quest apparently began with a reading of
>The Autobiography of Malcolm X and led him to investig
ate Islam. During visits as a teenager to Internet chat rooms and mosques in the San
Francisco Bay area he encountered followers of the ��tablikhi jamaat,� a movement
roughly translated as �preaching society� that encoura
ges Muslims to contact those whose faith is drifting and steer them back into the
orbit of a mosque� (Associated Press).
�After graduating from an independent studies high school at 16, Lindh departed for
Yemen in 1998 to study Arabic with his parents� blessing. He returned home in 1999,
after 10 months in Yemen. He stayed in Marin County f
or about eight months, but apparently felt lonely and unsettled. In February 2000, he
returned to Yemen and eventually moved to Pakistan, where he studied at an Islamic
school near the Afghan border. It was there he fell
in with the Taliban, Lindh told the CNN crew as he was being treated for wounds
suffered during the deadly prisoner revolt in Mazar-e-Sharif.�
Revulsion at the materialism of the West and a yearning for the apparently more
spiritualistic East are not so odd or rare as they may first appear. Such sentiments
reoccur throughout Western cultural and political histor
y, from Sir Richard Burton to Lawrence of Arabia. In Walker�s case this took a
reactionary and tragic form.
The Walker case raises many troubling questions that the Times editors, in the
sanctimonious tones known only to the wealthy elite, do not dare address. Why should
an idealistic youth take such a path? What were the alter
natives to which he was exposed?
The editorial asserts that to be in Walker�s position �is to have fallen down a rabbit
hole of one�s own making.� Earlier this year, in regard to another case with tragic
dimensions, that of the right-wing terrorist, Okla
homa City bomber Timothy McVeigh, the Times referred to �a mind warped by self-induced
militancy.� The refrain is similar. The fates of Walker and McVeigh are entirely
self-produced, they have nothing to do with the gener
al condition of American society or of its younger generation.
The anger and confusion of the Times� editorial reflect concerns that are not simply
of an overtly political character. Somehow the Walker case strikes too close to home.
The editors react furiously to any sign of youth r
ejecting their values, rejecting the society that has made them rich and complacent.
It is incomprehensible to such people why anyone would be dissatisfied with the
results of the stock market and profit boom of the 1990s
, with the inequality blighting the US, with the corruption and arrogance of its
ruling elite.
Walker and McVeigh listened to false prophets and took terribly false paths, but,
again, who is primarily to blame for that? What were the options offered them? Such
youth saw no possibility within the existing institutio
ns for the creation of a just and equal society. There was nothing in the official
culture and media, with its deadening worship of wealth and the market, to inspire
their idealism and instinct for self-sacrifice. They ar
e not alone. That a large number of American youth see no possibility of a meaningful
life helps explain the atrocity at Columbine and other school shootings.
The Walker case is fascinating, and one that for all its extraordinary characteristics
is hardly as alien to the American experience as Bush and the media would have us
believe. The Bush administration has already apparen
tly backed down from its intention to try Walker on treason charges. It would no doubt
like to settle this business behind the scenes. If ever there were a need for a lawyer
who would not cringe, who would challenge publi
c opinion and force it to look at the circumstances, social and personal, underlying a
case, this is it. There is something profound about the Walker case.
There is already a segment of the American population that senses that there is more
involved in Walker�s situation than the media will acknowledge, a segment of the
population that has not made up its mind. There is no r
eason to believe that an American jury, presented with all the facts, would rush to
convict John Walker.
A society reveals a great deal about itself by the way it treats its youth, even those
who make mistakes. John Walker found himself, more or less accidentally, in a tragic
position. The official response is out-and-out br
utality. George Bush, the former president, told ABC TV, �Make him leave his hair the
way it is and his face as dirty as it is and let him go wandering around this country
and see what kind of sympathy he would get. I mea
n, he�s just despicable.� This from a man who never knew a day of poverty or
deprivation in his life, whose own son, incidentally, had a checkered life well into
his forties. The principal difference between Walker and Bu
sh junior is that the latter was never motivated for an instant by altruistic,
generous or humane interests.
The Los Angeles Times specifically editorialized against any consideration of Walker�s
age: �Does it really matter whether John Walker Lindh, the 20-year-old American who
came to world attention after a bloody prison upri
sing among Taliban soldiers last month, is a purposeful and coldhearted Taliban
warrior or just took a noir detour in his youthful odyssey of spiritual
self-discovery? American courts increasingly have lost patience with
such nuance in dealing with young criminals.�
Is there no one to be found who will speak up for this youth?
The question�what brought Walker to Afghanistan?�is bound up with the still more
complex one: what brought the US to Afghanistan? Walker is one element of the
catastrophe that America has produced in that country. The pre
sent war originates, not in Central Asia, but in the US. The horrifying violence that
the Bush administration and the US military have unleashed on Afghanistan cannot be
understood without reference to the deep social con
tradictions within America itself, contradictions of which the Times� �liberal�
inhumanity and John Walker�s peculiar evolution are further expressions.
Copyright 1998-2001
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
