-Caveat Lector-
From
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/pf/p-j122801.html
}}}>Begin
Behind the Headlines
by Justin Raimondo
Antiwar.com
December 28, 2001
STRANGE SYMBIOSIS � ISRAEL & ANTI-SEMITISM
That 'sh*tty little country' is dangerous � to its allies, and to
Jews everywhere
As Israel prepares to expel its Arab helots from Palestine, its "amen
corner" worldwide is also on the march, excoriating anyone who looks
cross-eyed at Ariel Sharon as an "anti-Semite." The latest front in
this campaign is England, where Barbara Amiel, wife of media magnate
Conrad Black, went on a rampage in the Telegraph, claiming that, at a
recent dinner party, the French ambassador referred to Israel as
"that sh*tty little country," and wondered why the world had to be
dragged to the edge of World War III on account of it. On the basis
of evidence gleaned at ritzy cocktail parties, says Ms. Amiel, the
world is experiencing a revival of anti-Semitism, which is now
"respectable" again.
OSAMA ON MTV?
Oh, please! Does she really expect us to believe that Osama's infamous videos
denouncing the "Jews and Crusaders" are the "in" thing with the hip cognoscenti? Lay
off the crack pipe, lady, and get real: anti-Semitism is l
ess respectable than pedophilia. After all, hordes of people aren't buying The
Protocols of the Elder of Zion the way they're snatching up those Abercrombie & Fitch
catalogs, now are they? Amiel's essay is just one breath
taking inversion of reality after another. Getta load-a this:
"For the past 25 years, I've watched sad-faced Israeli activists trudge around Western
capitals with heavy hearts beating under ill-fitting suits. They carry folders of
transcripts and videotapes to document the misrepres
entations in the press and the moral hypocrisy of the world towards Israel. They want
to win the war of ideas on its merits. Their attention to detail in translating the
hate literature of the Middle East and the hate-fil
led speeches of its leaders is commendable."
FOLLOW THE MONEY
One can only wonder what "Western capitals" she means: surely not Washington, D.C.
Everyone acknowledges that the Israel lobby is among the most powerful in the Imperial
City. How else have they managed to get their hands
on a grand total of $90 billion-plus in American military and economic aid since
Israel's inception?
A STRANGE IRONY
Aside from US exporters, Israel is the single largest beneficiary of our "foreign aid"
program: US tax dollars paid for a booby-trap bomb planted near an Arab elementary
school, which blasted a group of Palestinian childr
en � children! � to bits. American tax dollars also pay for Israeli "settlements"
inhabited by violent, fanatical fundamentalists intent on provoking war no matter
what. This image of sad bedraggled little underdogs makin
g their rounds, desperately fighting an uphill battle against overwhelming odds, is
nothing but a bad joke � either that, or it is meant to be ironic.
I SHOULD BE SO POWERLESS
If the Israeli lobby is so powerless, then why this American largesse? We not only arm
Israel, but we also prop up their sh*tty little socialist economy with constant
infusions of cash. Whatever those Israeli "activists"
are carrying around in their folders, whatever is on those videotapes, it must be some
pretty powerful stuff. Given the Fox News revelations about the extent of Israeli
spying in the US, I don't even want to hazard a gues
s as to what's in them.
THE ONEIDA PURGE
They want to "win the war of ideas on its merits"? Tell that to Jean Ryan, former
managing editor of the Oneida (NY) Daily Dispatch, and city editor Dale Seth (a
15-year veteran of the paper), who were both fired when a d
elegation of Israel Firsters approached the editor and then the owner demanding the
paper retract an allegedly "anti-Semitic" post-9/11 editorial written by Seth. Seth's
crime was to recall the terrorist origins of the Je
wish state � as if no one had ever heard of the Irgun and the Stern Gang, both of
which waged war on the Arab civilian population � and without which the state of
Israel would never have come into existence. He also made
the true but politically incorrect observation that the whole region is rife with
religious fanaticism, and Israel is no exception to the rule:
"The United States, through its close association with Israel since its inception, has
now been dragged kicking and screaming right into the middle of that centuries-old
Middle Eastern conflict. From that position, it wou
ld behoove that party in the middle to consider the hearts of the warring parties.
Neither can be simply beat into submission."
UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER
A local attorney, Randy Schaal, demanded a meeting with Ryan to protest the editorial:
Ryan refused to meet with him, pointing out that that if the staff met with everyone
who disagreed with an editorial, they would never
get a paper out. She told him to write a letter to the editor, which he did. But
Schaal also contacted local politicians, as well as the Anti-Defamation League, and it
wasn't long before pressure was brought to bear on t
he paper's management, which then ordered its editors to come up with a
"clarification." This was published alongside Schaal's letter, a letter from Rep.
Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY), and a missive from the mayor of Oneida. S
till, Schaal and his fellow Ameners weren't satisfied. They went to the President of
the Journal Register Co., and demanded a retraction and an apology: it was
unconditional surrender, or nothing.
GROVELING TOWARD BETHLEHEM
After a series of meetings with various self-appointed representatives of the Jewish
community, the owners of the Daily Dispatch caved and published a groveling mea culpa:
"We understand many felt [the editorial] expresse
d anti-Semitic sentiments," it said. "We will not further offend our readers by
attempting in any way to justify what was written; we can only assure readers that The
Dispatch is not anti-Semitic and that we acknowledge t
he editorial should not have been published."
So much for the Israeli lobby winning the war of ideas on the "merits" of their case.
Clearly, another strategy is at work here: not debating their opponents but silencing
them.
ODE TO BRUTE FORCE
The rest of Amiel's essay is really a kind of paean to the efficacy of brute force.
While those poor bedraggled Israeli "activists" may have been fighting an uphill
battle, according to Amiel, in the post-9/ 11 era the ti
de seems to be turning, and she can hardly keep herself from gloating that now the
Arabs are really going to get it:
"Powerful as the truth may be, it needs a nudge from 16,000lb daisy cutter bombs once
in a while. The Arab/Muslim world's intransigence comes into sharper focus when we see
the Americans liberate Afghanistan from the Tali
ban in six weeks and a cornered Arafat unable to go to the bathroom without the risk
of being blown into the next world."
PSYCHOPATHIA SEXUALIS
Here is the kind of Zionist who clearly enjoys the brutality and indignity of the
Israeli occupation. Such people now feel free to publicly exhibit and even flaunt
their perversity, which seems like something straight out
of Kraft-Ebbing. What else can one call Amiel's odd interest in controlling Arafat's
bowel movements other than a sh*tty little perversion?
THE TERRORISTIC IMPERATIVE
"Nothing succeeds like powerful bombs," exults this war goddess, "as bin Laden
explained in his latest video release. 'When people see a strong horse and a weak
horse, by nature they will like the strong horse,' he said."
How natural for her to approvingly cite bin Laden on the terroristic imperative: but
then that is what tribal warfare is all about, no matter which side one fights on.
CHOO-CHOO
Yes, it is force, not reason or negotiation, that is decisive, avers Ms. Amiel, who
gleefully predicts that "All those people badmouthing the Jews and Israel will quieten
down." Or else be quieted down, involuntarily, lik
e Jean Ryan, Dale Seth, and now perhaps Carl Cameron, of Fox News. "You are looking,"
Amiel continues, "at the tail end of the train but the engine has already turned a
corner and is going in the opposite direction" � and
anyone who shows up at one of those ritzy parties she's always attending had better
get on board, or else.
AMIEL'S JIHAD
No one would think to label denunciations of, say, Robert Mugabe, as the equivalent of
anti-black racism: but we are expected to just accept that virtually all criticism of
Israel and Ariel Sharon is due to "anti-Semitism
." Amiel's blatantly dishonest and self-serving jihad is naturally bound to cause
resentment among all thinking people � an emotion that could, easily, turn into
genuine anti-Semitism. But that, I believe, is the point: a
nti-Semitism serves the interests of the most extreme wing of the Zionist movement,
and always has.
100 YEARS AFTER DREYFUSS
Founded as it is on the permanence of Jewish victimology, and the idea that
anti-Semitism is inevitable, Zionism thrives when Jewish persecution grows. It is a
natural tendency of Zionist propaganda to exaggerate hostilit
y to Jews. The founder of Zionism, Theodore Herzl, was confirmed in his opinion that
it was "futile" to combat anti-Semitism when the infamous Dreyfuss case was at the
center of a storm of controversy. Today, however, wit
h the rapid decline and marginalization of anti- Semitism everywhere but in the Middle
East, the pressing need for a Jewish state requires more justification.
WHY A JEWISH STATE?
Anti-Semitism in the West, as "hate crime" statistics and other research has shown in
recent years, is practically nonexistent. This good news was hailed by Jewish
organizations in the US when it was first announced, but
the extreme Zionists were no doubt made uneasy. For if anti-Jewish prejudice is
distinctly beyond the pale, at least in the civilized world, i.e., the West, then what
do we need a Jewish state for? This is a question many
Jews, when faced with an appeal to emigrate to Israel, must ask themselves, and, at
least up until Ms. Amiel's outburst, the Zionists have had no good answer. Now they
appear to have solved the problem by simply redefini
ng "anti-Semitism" to mean any criticism of Israel's expansionist policies and its
current radical right-wing government.
THE OLD ANTI-SEMITISM
Anti-Semitism used to mean legal and cultural proscriptions directed against Jews. In
medieval Europe, Jews were forced into ghettos, in Nazi Germany they were branded with
the yellow star and exterminated, and, in Americ
a and Europe, it used to be that some establishments, both high and low, would not do
business with Jews. Certain hotels and men's clubs would not admit them, and anti-
Semitism was especially rife in the universities whe
re an unofficial Jewish quota kept their numbers and influence limited. This is real
anti-Semitism, and, today, it is not only illegal but socially and politically
unacceptable: anyone deemed an anti-Semite in this, the o
riginal sense, is in effect a pariah, and rightly so.
THE NEW ANTI-SEMITISM
This, however, has nothing to do with the French ambassador's purported "hate crime."
To begin with, in describing Israel as "a sh*tty little country," Ambassador Bernard
is at least half right in that it is little. That,
after all, has been the chief complaint of the more extreme Zionists, who dream of a
Greater Israel and claim such a small sliver of a country is militarily indefensible.
As for being "sh*tty," perhaps the ambassador was
referring to the attitude of Israel's leaders, and, again, who can contest this?
Wasn't it Ariel Sharon who compared the President of the United States to Neville
Chamberlain, and declared that he would not let the US sell out Israel like
Chamberlain sold out Czechoslovakia? Isn't it the Israelis who
are openly wielding a nuclear stick, threatening the whole region with annihilation if
anyone dares stand in Sharon's way? Wasn't it the Israelis Carl Cameron was talking
about on Fox News last week when he said that a ce
rtain foreign intelligence agency had been watching the hijackers or their associates
closely � and may have failed to tip off the US to their plans?
THE RIGHT WORD
I think Ambassador Bernard has chosen just the right word: sh*tty. This is not an
ethnic slur, but an entirely accurate description of Israeli government policy. The
New Anti-Semitism, however, as unveiled by Ms. Amiel, w
ould forbid the public expression of such obvious truths, because it has nothing,
really, to do with dislike of Jews or Jewishness per se. The way Ms. Amiel means it,
the charge of anti-Semitism is a smokescreen that conc
eals a campaign to delegitimize all critics of Israel, and rule them out of order.
NO MORE SCOOPS?
Speaking of the Israeli spy operation uncovered by Fox News: when Carl Cameron turned
over that rock, what wriggled out wasn't pretty, and it didn't take long for the
drumbeat to start: has Fox News gone "anti-Semitic"? A
JTA story on the response of some Jewish organizations and the Israeli government
reiterates their contention that the story is "totally baseless," and notes that
"virtually no other American media organization has run a
piece on the Fox allegations � a sign that the story lacks merit, Jewish leaders
say." Oh, really? This defines the idea of a "scoop" out of existence, and reduces
journalists to a pack of conformists, ruled not by a des
ire to discover and report the truth but by a primitive herd instinct. If not for the
scoop, we would never have known about Watergate, Cointelpro, Monica-gate, or any
other news stories that erode blind faith in governme
nt and the wisdom of our glorious leaders.
FIXING FOX
The JTA piece slyly raises the subtle suggestion of anti-Semitism when the author
avers that "American Jewish and Israeli officials are baffled about what might have
led Fox or Cameron to pursue so controversial a story o
n the basis of evidence they regard as so flimsy," especially because Fox has been
seen by Jewish groups as "fair in its reportage on Israel." The clear implication
being that the problem is Cameron, not Fox. Ominously, t
he article also reports that "American Jewish leaders and Israeli officials said they
are holding conversations with Fox News representatives." Will Cameron meet the same
fate as Dale Seth and Jean Ryan?
DOWN THE MEMORY HOLE
A Fox News spokesman is quoted as saying, "We stand by the story" � but apparently not
enough to keep it on their website. As I reported the other day, all four parts of the
Cameron piece were summarily pulled from the Fo
x News website: visitors to the previous url get a smiling picture of Carl Cameron and
the Orwellian message: "This story no longer exists." Indeed.
RETURN OF THE THOUGHT POLICE
This, of course, is what Israel's amen corner in the US and Great Britain would
ultimately like to see: they want to make it a "hate crime" to criticize Israel, even
as that evil dwarf Sharon drives us to the brink of Wor
ld War III. In Tony Blair's Britain they've gone to great lengths to outlaw and
prosecute "hate speech," and are now going after the anti-Muslim neo-Nazi British
National Party with new proposals extending "anti-racist" d
efamation laws to include religion. But there is nothing to prevent this kind of
left-wing political correctness from being used against critics of Israel, and the
Israeli lobby, so that the dinner party conversation Babs
Amiel so avidly denounces could be grounds for legal prosecution. For the new
definition of "anti-Semitism," if it is to be properly enforced, requires a political
police, and this is really the role Amiel and her fellow
Israel Firsters in the US are ideally suited for: police spies.
SINCE WHEN?
If, like Congressman Darrel Issa (R-CA), Carl Cameron escapes a Jewish Defense League
bombing, such as the one that was thwarted the other day, will his career survive this
controversy? I certainly hope so, but the remova
l of the story from the Fox News website � and now this news of "conversations" taking
place between Fox News, unnamed American Jewish leaders, and the Israeli government �
does not bode well for his future in journalism.
By the way, since when does an American media outlet engage in "discussions" or
negotiations regarding the content of its news coverage with any government, let alone
a foreign one?
DEBUNKING THE DEBUNKERS
Cameron's debunkers claim that the use of anonymous sources automatically discredits
Cameron's work. So Woodward and Bernstein were wrong to have relied on "Deep Throat"?
I don't think so. Such a standard would eliminate
95 percent of the journalism done today: there would be no "leaks" of embarrassing
information by government whistleblowers, and government officials would tell us what
they think we need to know, while reporters record t
heir words verbatim. That's not journalism, however: it's taking dictation.
BEYOND BETRAYAL
Cameron's story came straight from the lips of law enforcement officials who clearly
have inside knowledge of the direction the 9/11 investigation is taking. These
investigators are convinced that Israeli intelligence had
foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, and Cameron's reports demonstrated that they
certainly had the means to acquire it. Israeli penetration of the phone system -- and
even supposedly "secure" phone lines in the White Hous
e, the Department of Defense, and the Justice Department, as well as local law
enforcement -- has long been suspected: Cameron showed how it operates through Israeli
hi-tech companies which are practically arms of the Isr
aeli government.
But even this kind of penetration would hardly come as a surprise to anyone, really:
the Mossad is well-known for its boldness, and the history of Israeli spying in the US
is notorious. But the core of Cameron's story goe
s waaay beyond that. While "there is no indication that the Israelis were involved in
the 9-11 attacks," Cameron avers,
"Investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the
attacks in advance, and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are
'tie-ins.' But when asked for details, he flatly refused
to describe them, saying, 'evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I
cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information.'"
YOU WANT THE TRUTH?
You're not allowed to know the truth about 9/11 � why, that's classified information,
sir! Now this is bound to arouse a certain amount of resentment, just like Ms. Amiel's
smear campaign. But that's the idea, you see. If
anti-Semitism is not a problem, then that is a problem for the Zionist project, and
so the idea is to provoke it, create it where it never before existed. One way to do
that is to redefine "anti-Semitism" in such broad t
erms that it could include practically anybody but Norman Podhoretz.
THE COLLABORATORS
Another method is to evoke anti-Semitic sentiments and reactions by means of a
deliberate provocation. Remember that the notorious "Stern gang," the Zionist
equivalent of Hamas, collaborated with the Nazis on the grounds
that they shared a common goal: the expulsion of the Jews from Europe. They thought
this strategy would encourage emigration to Palestine and help establish the state of
Israel. Chaim Weizmann, put in charge of selecting
which German Jews would emigrate to Palestine � and later to become Israel's first
president � made the argument that, in choosing between establishing a Jewish state
and rescuing the Jews from the Nazis, the Zionist proj
ect had to come first. His intellectual and political heirs are entirely capable of
justifying and executing the same tactics.
FUELING THE FIRE
The possible firing of Carl Cameron, and/or the spiking of his story, would certainly
give real anti- Semites plenty of ammunition to repeat the tired old canard that the
media is "controlled by the Jews." But that is pre
cisely what the nuttier Zionists want. They know that time is not on their side:
Israel is demographically doomed if more Jews don't emigrate, and here is where the
symbiotic relationship between anti-Semitism and Zionist
extremism comes into play.
A BAD STRATEGY
At its current rate, the Arab birthrate will overwhelm the Jewish state sooner rather
than later, just on the strength of sheer numbers. By objectively encouraging
anti-Semitism, and building it up into this looming mass
movement, Zionist ideologues can appeal to their own people to come "home." What other
hope do they have of holding off the rising demographic tide? Apart from whatever
moral qualms one may have with this tactic, just in
practical terms the great mistake of such a strategy is that it may succeed all too
well � and that would be a tragedy. Regardless of her intent, Ms. Amiel's complaint of
anti-Semitism could easily turn out to be a self-f
ulfilling prophecy.
A NOTE
I want to apologize for the rather intimidating length of this column, but I think the
subject is important enough to merit using up so much bandwidth. This should answer,
then, all those fervent letter-writers, including
supporters of Israel who accuse me of anti-Semitism, and also those anti-Semites who
berate me for ridiculing their psychopathology.
Please Support Antiwar.com
A contribution of $25 or more gets you a copy of Justin Raimondo's Into the Bosnian
Quagmire: The Case Against U.S. Intervention in the Balkans, a 60-page booklet packed
with the kind of intellectual ammunition you need t
o fight the lies being put out by this administration and its allies in Congress. And
now, for a limited time, donors of $50 or more receive a copy of Ronald Radosh's
classic study of the Old Right conservatives, Prophets
on the Right: Profiles of Conservative Critics of American Globalism. Send
contributions to
Antiwar.com
520 S. Murphy Avenue, #202
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
or Contribute Via our Secure Server
Credit Card Donation Form
Back to Antiwar.com Home Page | Contact Us
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
