-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020101-9981049.htm

}}}>Begin
The Washington Times
www.washtimes.com

Author under fire on accuracy of gun research

Robert Stacy McCain
THE WASHINGTON TIMES Published 1/1/02



     Michael Bellesiles' book "Arming America" won praise from gun-
control advocates for "demolishing the myth" behind the individual
right to gun ownership, with reviewers calling the book "exciting"
and "valuable and thought-provoking."
     Now Mr. Bellesiles' book, which contended that private gun
ownership was uncommon in early America, is being called something
else: a fraud.
     Several scholars, including some who favor gun-control laws, say
the research in "Arming America" is inaccurate or even deliberately
deceptive.
     They say the book misinterprets Colonial documents, misquotes early federal laws, 
distorts historical accounts and cites San Francisco records that officials agree were 
destroyed in the 1906 earthquake.
     Gun rights activists denounced the Bellesiles book when it was published in 
September 2000. In recent months, liberals, too, have turned against Mr. Bellesiles.
     Serious errors in "Arming America" have been exposed in the Boston Globe and the 
New York Times, and pundit Russell Baker has dubbed Mr. Bellesiles "the Milli Vanilli 
of the academic community."
     "There's absolutely no question in my mind of intentional deception on [Mr. 
Bellesiles�] part," says Clayton Cramer, author of two books on the history of 
American gun laws, who says he's found "hundreds and hundreds
" of errors in "Arming America."
     "Simple mistakes will not explain what's gone on here. This is more than typos. 
This is massive misrepresentation of his own sources," Mr. Cramer said, calling Mr. 
Bellesiles' 603- page book "a target-rich environmen
t for finding deception or fraud."
     On his Web site � www.claytoncramer.com � Mr. Cramer shows how Mr. Bellesiles' 
falsely contended that a 1792 federal law required Congress to supply guns to militia 
members, when in fact the law required militia memb
ers to provide their own guns.
     It is an important distinction, according to legal scholars, because private 
ownership of guns for militia service is linked to the constitutional "right to keep 
and bear arms." By saying the 1792 law made the federa
l government � not individual citizens � the source of militia guns, "Arming America" 
struck at the heart of Second Amendment protections.
     "Bellesiles made no secret of his political agenda," author Richard Poe says. "He 
stated it plainly. And he apparently bent the facts to suit his agenda, with 
extravagant disdain for the truth."
     The most serious charge against Mr. Bellesiles, a professor at Emory University 
in Atlanta, is that he based his book in part on records that do not exist.
     Mr. Bellesiles said he had researched more than 10,000 probate inventories � 
lists of estate items included in official wills � and found that, contrary to popular 
belief, guns were uncommon in early American homes.
     "America's gun culture is an invented tradition," Mr. Bellesiles wrote, disputing 
frontier legends of the pioneer cabin with a musket hanging above the hearth.
     His assertion that gun ownership was rare in America until the mid-19th century 
made Mr. Bellesiles a hero of gun-control advocates, who praised him for "debunk[ing] 
the mythology propagated by the gun lobby."
     Michael Barnes, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said Mr. 
Bellesiles "has removed one more weapon in the gun lobby's arsenal of fallacies 
against common-sense gun laws."
     In April, Mr. Bellesiles was awarded the Bancroft Prize, perhaps the most 
prestigious award for an American historian. Repeatedly, "Arming America" drew praise 
for Mr. Bellesiles' heavily footnoted use of probate rec
ords, which The Washington Post called the author's "freshest and most interesting 
source."
     But in many cases, researchers say, that evidence is nonexistent.
     In the most glaring instance, Mr. Bellesiles cites guns listed in probate records 
for San Francisco between 1849 and 1859. However, authorities say, all such records 
were destroyed in the city's 1906 earthquake.
     "All official probate records were destroyed in the San Francisco earthquake and 
fire because the city hall burned down," a reference librarian at the city's Sutro 
Library told National Review's Melissa Seckora.
     Like other critics, Miss Seckora found that Mr. Bellesiles changed his story when 
confronted with questions about his research. Mr. Cramer says Mr. Bellesiles has 
"changed his story three times" about misquoting the
1792 Militia Act.
     In recent months, "Arming America" has attracted a growing swarm of researchers 
who have found other serious errors. Northwestern University law professor James 
Lindgren says Mr. Bellesiles "counted guns in about 100
 wills [in Colonial Rhode Island] where people died without wills."
     Although researchers often disagree over the interpretation of data, scholars 
say, making up sources is an offense almost unheard of among serious historians.
     "Everyone makes some mistakes," Bentley College history professor Joyce Malcolm 
said. "It's just in this case, the mistakes were wholesale. The book is just riddled 
with errors. It was so astounding, as a historian,
I felt my jaw drop."
     Mrs. Malcolm, whose 1994 book "To Keep and Bear Arms" traced the British roots of 
the Second Amendment, said the possibility Mr. Bellesiles fabricated data "takes your 
breath away."
     "All his mistakes tend to support his thesis, every single one of them," she 
said. "It's hard to believe it's in good faith."
     Mr. Bellesiles did not return telephone calls seeking comment on "Arming 
America." In the November issue of the Organization of American Historians (OAH) 
newsletter, however, he replied to his "ideologically charged"
 critics, saying he was the victim of "personal attacks," including "hateful, 
threatening, and expletive-laced phone calls, mail, e-mail and faxes."
     In his OAH article, Mr. Bellesiles said many of his notes for "Arming America" 
were destroyed when his Emory office was flooded in April 2000 and that he "had to 
reconstruct where I read the probate files from memory
." He said an upcoming issue of the William and Mary Quarterly devoted to the "Arming 
America" controversy "will explore alternative readings of the evidence."
     The nature of the charges against Mr. Bellesiles causes some academics to insist 
on anonymity in discussing what one professor called "the worst historical scandal in 
memory."
     James Melton, chairman of the Emory University history department, has asked Mr. 
Bellesiles to answer his accusers in detail.
     Mr. Bellesiles must "defend himself and the integrity of his scholarship 
immediately," Mr. Melton told the Boston Globe in October, adding: "Depending upon his 
response, the university will respond appropriately."
     Emory's demand that Mr. Bellesiles' defend his work is ominous, author John Lott 
says.
     "The fact that Emory is asking him to respond to these critics is something I 
don't remember a university asking a professor to do," says Mr. Lott, a scholar with 
the American Enterprise Institute, whose 1998 book "M
ore Guns, Less Crime" stirred debate over firearms laws. "I imagine Emory would be 
forced to take some kind of dramatic response, if [the accusations of fraud are] true."

Copyright � 2001 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.



Return to the article
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to