-Caveat Lector-
From
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/17/business/17TAX.html?ex=1011848400&en
=f72772829490a18c&ei=5038&partner=ASAHI
>>>Image charts and graphs @ site showing the number of Enron's
subsidiaries in tax havens, incorporated by location. Cayman=692;
Turks&Caicos=119; Mauritius=43; others in thesingle digits.
The Cayman Is are right below Cuba; Turks are right above the
Dominican Republic; and Mauritius is some 500 miles off the east
coast of Madagascar. A<>E<>R<<<
}}}>Begin
January 17, 2002
Enron Avoided Income Taxes in 4 of 5 Years
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
nron (news/quote) paid no income taxes in four of the last five
years, using almost 900 subsidiaries in tax-haven countries and other
techniques, an analysis of its financial reports to shareholders
shows. It was also eligible for $382 million in tax refunds.
The company used strategies common among businesses to avoid taxes.
It also used some unusual methods, among them the creation of 881
subsidiaries abroad, including 692 in the Cayman Islands, 119 in the
Turks and Caicos, 43 in Mauritius and 8 in Bermuda.
Two Enron subsidiaries have been accused by a group of insurers of
engaging in sham transactions in a tax haven, according to papers in
federal bankruptcy court in New York.
Enron is by no means alone in not paying income taxes. A small but growing percentage
of large companies pay no income taxes, a study by Citizens for Tax Justice showed in
October 2000. The study of half the Fortune 500 c
ompanies found that 24 owed no tax in 1998, up from 13 in 1997 and 16 in 1996.
While it is common for American companies to create subsidiaries in tax havens abroad,
Enron had far more than most other companies, tax experts said.
Dynegy (news/quote), a Houston competitor of Enron in the energy trading business,
said yesterday that it had no subsidiaries in tax havens. In disclosure reports,
Chevron (news/quote) lists three subsidiaries in tax have
ns and Exxon Mobil (news/quote) lists six.
The tax-haven subsidiaries enabled Enron to create partnerships to eliminate taxes
using techniques that came under attack from the Treasury Department and the Internal
Revenue Service during the Clinton administration.
The basic technique involves having profits go to a partner not subject to American
taxes, like a bank in a tax-haven country. The partner, after taking its fee, then
returns the profits in a form that is recognized as no
t taxable by American law.
Enron avoided taxes for another big reason: deductions for stock options. When
executives exercise stock options the company takes a deduction on its corporate
income tax return equal to the profit realized by the executi
ve, even though it is not required to show an expense on its profit-and-loss statement
to shareholders. The benefits to the company can be great, particularly if a soaring
stock price leads to the exercise of large number
s of options. That was true at Enron when its shares were soaring in 1998 through 2000.
It is not clear from Enron's financial reports how much the tax-haven operations
reduced the company's taxes. But Enron did disclose that deductions for stock options
alone turned what would have been a tax bill of $112 m
illion in 2000 into a refund of $278 million.
Indeed, the company paid taxes in only one of the years from 1996 to 2000, while the
government paid the company hundreds of millions of dollars in refunds.
The analysis of Enron's tax payments was performed by Citizens for Tax Justice, an
organization that is backed by labor unions. But its calculations are widely accepted
by groups with different views, like the conservativ
e Heritage Foundation.
Mark Palmer, an Enron spokesman, said yesterday that he was unable to comment on the
tax issues.
If shareholders had read just the large print in Enron's financial reports, they might
have come away thinking the company did pay income taxes. The reports say the company
paid hundreds of millions of dollars in corporat
e income taxes over the last five years. But company financial reports often disclose
numbers different from what the companies actually pay because of such matters as when
income is recognized and when expenses are deduc
ted. So only in the fine print � the footnotes � of Enron's reports does it become
clear that no tax was due.
Tax experts said corporations create offshore subsidiaries in tax havens for many
legitimate reasons, including keeping profits earned overseas from being taxed in the
United States, avoiding American regulation and insul
ating foreign business partners from American tax law.
These havens are also attractive because they do not require companies to disclose
anything about their financial dealings.
"Their efforts to escape regulation and the tax issues are chicken- and- egg," said a
former senior Treasury official who fought what he viewed as abusive corporate tax
shelters, including one used by Enron, in the Clinto
n administration. He insisted on not being identified.
The official said Enron wanted to engage in trading far beyond what its financial
resources would allow under the rules of regulators, from the Oregon Public Utilities
Commission to the federal Commodity Futures Trading C
ommission.
Another way Enron reduced taxes was through a technique that allowed it to deduct
interest payments to partners of subsidiaries. The Clinton administration
unsuccessfully sought legislation to block that.
Enron used these and other techniques to eliminate taxes in other countries, several
tax experts said.
"The object was to not pay taxes in any country where it operated," said one
international tax lawyer who insisted he not be identified because he has worked on
Enron matters.
"You certainly do not want to pay U.S. taxes on income earned in another country," he
said. The lawyer was critical of Chevron and Exxon Mobil for not following Enron's
example to avoid taxes, saying, "It is neither illeg
al nor unethical."
Donald C. Alexander, a former Internal Revenue Service commissioner, said that
"partnerships are frequently used for the purpose of eliminating tax."
"You need a tax-exempt partner and so long as you can pass a fairly low threshold of
substance it will work."
Enron has been a major lobbyist for exemptions from taxes and from oversight by
regulatory authorities, spending $3.5 million in 1999 and 2000 alone on lobbying.
The chairman of the American Bar Association tax section, Richard Lipton, said the
creation of hundreds of subsidiaries showed that Enron sought to "spread legal
liability and reduce the possibility that if one partnershi
p goes bad it will not infect any others." He said this would give comfort to other
partners, like banks, dealing with Enron.
Mr. Lipton, a partnership specialist with the McDermott Will & Emery law firm in
Chicago, said the existence of so many subsidiaries "raises only an eyebrow, not an
alarm, but any allegation of shams raised by an insuranc
e company is a red flag."
Just such an accusation is raised in filings by the Continental Casualty Company and
other insurers in Enron's bankruptcy proceedings in New York. The insurers do not want
to pay on bonds guaranteeing a deal involving Enr
on and two tax-haven companies. The insurers have refused to pay because they think
the deal may be a sham, they say in their court papers.
In a court filing the insurers argued that the companies and Enron "may never have
entered into any contracts with any end users" that were part of the deal and instead
may have improperly diverted the money. The insurers
had no comment.
Ronald A. Pearlman, a Georgetown University tax law professor, said it was likely that
Enron wanted a new subsidiary for each of its many partnerships, but added that "the
I.R.S. should be looking at these transactions."
Lee Sheppard, a New York lawyer who writes critiques for Tax Notes
magazine, said that "tax havens are also bank secrecy havens." She
said that given earlier disclosures about Enron executives' engaging
in partnership deals with their employer, "it may be that they were
down there for the bank secrecy and were just hiding things from
shareholders, insurance companies and partners, not just the I.R.S."
Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
