-Caveat Lector-
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020118-67848731.htm
WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!
Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough
China intercepts P-3
A Chinese jet flew within 500 feet of a U.S. P-3 patrol aircraft in the
closest aerial encounter since the EP-3 incident April 1 near Hainan island.
U.S. intelligence officials said the Chinese F-8 interceptor jet conducted
the aerial maneuver with the P-3 maritime patrol craft over the East China
Sea on Jan. 7.
The encounter is raising new concerns in the Pentagon that Chinese air
force intercepts are becoming dangerous again. U.S. officials tell us the
Chinese interceptors have been coming closer to U.S. reconnaissance aircraft
over the past several months. The recent aggressive maneuvers are in stark
contrast to the previous Chinese practice of keeping a distance of many miles
when intercepting regular flights along the coast of China.
China's government had demanded an end to all U.S. reconnaissance
flights as a price for the return of 23 U.S. military crew members who were
taken hostage by the Chinese military following the incident on Hainan
island. A Chinese pilot flew his F-8 into the EP-3 and nearly killed the
crew. The aircraft was forced to make an emergency landing on Hainan island.
The Chinese pilot ejected and, according to Chinese press accounts, was eaten
by sharks in the South China Sea.
Gun camera
The Pentagon is reticent about discussing how many pro-Taliban fighters
it has killed since Oct. 7. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld refuses to
give a figure for the number of enemy dead.
But military officers tell us that U.S. air strikes, and
special-operations teams on the ground, have killed thousands in Afghanistan.
A lot of it happened at night. If there is videotape of the killing, it's not
likely to be shown at formal Pentagon press briefings.
We obtained one such documentary — gun-camera film from an Air Force
AC-130U Spectre gunship as it patrolled exit routes the night of Dec. 7 as
Kandahar fell to anti-Taliban forces.
As "Spooky" hovers, gunners spot a loose convoy of pro-Taliban soldiers
(perhaps a mix of Taliban militia and al Qaeda fighters) trying to get away.
At first, the gunship unloads volleys from a 40mm cannon. We counted 20
explosions all around the vehicle. But the gunner can't score a bull's-eye.
The fighters inside realize it's just a matter of time before the
aircraft scores a direct hit. Suddenly, the vehicle stops, and from the back,
nine of the enemy come running out.
"The initial shooting with the 40mm was not all that good.At least, they
got the vehicle to stop," said a military source who viewed the video. "One
of the guys looks like he is a definite candidate for the Taliban 2004
Olympic track team."
As the fighters run toward another vehicle a few hundred yards back up
the trail, the Spectre switches to its 25mm Gatling gun (1,800 rounds per
minute). This time the gunner doesn't miss. The moving bodies disappear in a
cloud of dust.
Politically correct Army
The political correctness of the Clinton administration may be coming
back to haunt the Pentagon. An official tells us the Army in 1998 produced a
"force-protection" video guide that lectured soldiers that terrorism was a
relative term.
"It is one of the most politically correct, apologetic, anti-American
diatribes I've ever seen," the official told us. "You'd think it was produced
by al Qaeda. It begins by stating that the 'Christian Crusaders' were
terrorists in their time."
The Army video also puts forth the notion that one man's terrorist is
another man's freedom fighter, pointing out that French resistance fighters
in World War II were terrorists because they blew up bridges during Nazi
occupation. The analogy is upsetting because the U.S. Army provided
assistance to the French fighters, and bridges are legitimate military
targets in military operations.
"The video describes terrorists in the most complimentary terms, calling
them 'highly motivated, very disciplined individuals who regard us as
legitimate combatants,'" said our informant. "This suggests good faith
beliefs by Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda legitimizes their actions."
The Army video is not just politically damaging. It is expected to
cause legal problems for the Pentagon and Justice Department in their efforts
to prosecute terrorists involved in the Pentagon and World Trade Center
attacks.
CIA China failure
The CIA released an embarrassing report this week in its in-house
journal showing, once again, how CIA analyses of China are not only flawed
today but were wrong in several aspects during the Korean War.
We reported recently that a panel of outside experts had found an
"institutional predisposition" by CIA hands in China to underestimate Chinese
military developments. The CIA rejected the criticism.
Now CIA operations officer P.K. Rose, writing in the current issue of
the CIA journal "Studies in Intelligence," has exposed a major CIA failure
during the Korean War to predict Chinese intervention in the conflict, which
he described as a "blunder" that proved to be deadly for U.S. troops.
Throughout China's military buildup on the North Korean border, the CIA
refused to believe intervention would take place. On Oct. 12, 1950, CIA
Office of Records and Estimates Paper 58-50 stated: "While full-scale Chinese
Communist intervention in Korea must be regarded as a continuing possibility,
a consideration of all known factors leads to the conclusion that barring a
Soviet decision for global war, such action is not probable in 1950."
In the weeks leading up to the Chinese invasion, "numerous intelligence
reports indicated Chinese preparations for military intervention," the author
stated.
When Chinese military forces began moving into North Korea on Oct. 13
and 14, 1950, the CIA still refused to believe an invasion was imminent. On
Oct. 15, the CIA's Daily Summary stated that "China had no intention of
entering the war in any large-scale fashion," and agency analysts also
adopted the conclusion that the troops were there "to protect the
hydroelectric plants along the Yalu River that provide power to the
Manchurian industrial area."
Astonishingly, even after the massive Chinese assault was launched, the
CIA refused to believe the 498,000 Chinese regular army troops and an
additional 370,000 security troops were part of an invasion.
As U.S. military intelligence from the region reported 12 Chinese
divisions in Korea, "On 24 November, however, National Intelligence Estimate
2/1 stated that China had the capability for large-scale offensive operations
but that there were no indications such an offensive was in the offing," the
article said.
"That same day, the second Chinese offensive started, leaving the 8th
Army fighting for its life and most of the 1st Marine Division surrounded and
threatened with annihilation," the article said.
Vieques
Four House members have asked Navy Secretary Gordon England in a letter
to explain why the Navy decided not to send the carrier USS John F. Kennedy,
and its battle group, to Vieques for live-fire training.
The Kennedy is scheduled to leave its Mayport, Fla., port soon for the
Arabian Sea near Afghanistan. The uniform chiefs of the Navy and Marine Corps
had asked Mr. England in writing to let the battle group go through live-fire
training on the Puerto Rican island, where protesters oppose any further Navy
training.
In the end, the Navy decided to have the Kennedy group practice at East
Coast ranges, avoiding a political confrontation that the White House does
not want.
The congressional letter states, "You denied them the ability to gain
this invaluable training on Vieques despite the specific request of the chief
of naval operations and the commandant of the Marine Corps without
identifying an equal or superior location. We have been informed that your
non-support has forced the battle group to use less suitable ranges on the
East Coast, where they will not be able to acquire the level of realistic
training that may potentially save the lives of our men and women in combat.
Why?"
The letter was signed by four Republicans: Reps. Dan Burton of Indiana,
chairman of the House Government Reform Committee; Bob Barr of Georgia;
Christopher Shays of Connecticut; and Adam H. Putnam of Florida.
A Navy spokesman said the decision not to conduct a final training
tune-up on Vieques was made by the Atlantic Fleet, not Mr. England.
A former Clinton administration official who fought to keep Vieques open
to the Navy told us the decision sends the signal that the Navy doesn't
really need Vieques as much as it contended during the past two years of
rancorous debate.
Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough are Pentagon reporters.
*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]
Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
Write to same address to be off lists!
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
