-Caveat Lector- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Richer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 9:26 PM Subject: [CTRL] Dan Rather Tops Dishonor Awards
> -Caveat Lector- > > http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/1/18/140030.shtml > > WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War! > > Dan Rather Tops Dishonor Awards > Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com > Saturday, Jan. 19, 2002 > WASHINGTON – To approving hoots, hollers and thunderous applause, hundreds of > activists Thursday night rated CBS anchorman Dan Rather the Most Outrageously > Biased Liberal Reporter for 2001. > Of the six Dishonors Awards bestowed at Media Research Center's annual > banquet, Rather won hands down in two categories: The Flakiest Comment of the > Year and the Sore Losers Award (for Refusing to Concede Bush’s Victory in > Florida). > > The Sore Losers Award, presented by syndicated columnist David Limbaugh, > spotlighted Rather’s coverage of Florida Secretary of State Katherine > Harris’ formal declaration that George W. Bush had indeed carried Florida. > > Dan Can't Handle the Truth > > The news clips showed the anchorman repeatedly telling his viewers that > "Republican" Harris was making a finding "as she sees it” or "as the > secretary of state sees it,” the clear implication being that this was a > partisan decision that bore no reality to facts. Unofficial recounts over the > following year, by liberal media outlets and others, have certified that yes, > Bush was the legitimate winner of Florida’s electoral votes. > > Harris herself appeared at the banquet Thursday and "congratulated” Rather > for winning the award. The Florida secretary of state, who is running for a > seat in Congress this year, said she merely followed the law and based her > declaration on the fact that the law "said what it said not what others > wanted it to say.” > > And as to the future, added Harris, well, as Dan would say, "Courage!” That > was a takeoff on Rather’s condescending, widely mocked signoff of his > newscast at a time of well-publicized turmoil at CBS. > > In announcing the award, Limbaugh said the judges’ nomination of Rather was > based on merit "as we see it.” > > Toobin in a Tizzy > > Among the "sore losers” who lost out to Rather was lawyer Jeffrey Toobin who, > after writing a book claiming "the wrong man was inaugurated” last year, > still refused to concede that Bush was a legitimate president because > thousands "meant to” vote for Gore and that "democracy" (though the U.S. is, > of course, a constitutional republic, not a democracy) is all about voters ’ > "intent." > > Earlier in the program, attendees at the banquet clapped and hollered "Dan! > Dan! Dan!” as presenter Kate O’Beirne, National Review Washington editor, > was opening the envelope after showing news clips of the competitors for > Flakiest Comment of the Year Award. > > And to wild applause, the CBS multimillionaire walked off with that Dishonor, > as well. The term "walked off” is used advisedly. Of course, none of the > award recipients was "able to make it” to the banquet. > > The clip that impressed the judges featured Rather answering Fox News > Channel’s Bill O’Reilly’s question, "Do you think Bill Clinton is an honest > man?” > > An Honest Liar > > Rather’s answer was, "I do.” But the flaky comment that really caught the > judges’ attention was his follow-up sentence that it is possible for a man to > "be honest and lie about any number of things.” > > The other winners included the following: > > > We’re All going to Die And It’s Bush’s Fault Award (for Doomsday > Environmental Reporting): CNN’s Margaret Carlson for saying that Bush was > "allowing harmful ingredients in nearly everything we eat and drink.” > > Bring Back Bubba Award (for Best Journalistic Lewinsky): Former UPI reporter > Helen Thomas for saying she missed President Clinton because "he gave us > hope.” Honorable mention, or "dishonorable mention” where Thomas was > concerned, was her out-of-the-blue question as to whether President Bush was > planning to invade Spain. This particular quote was mentioned by award > presenter John Fund of the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board. > > Peter Arnett Award (for Hopelessly Foolish Wartime Reporting): ABC News > President David Westin who said that, as a journalist, he had no opinion one > way or another whether the Pentagon was a legitimate target for terrorists. > > Damn Every Conservative We Can Think of to Hell Award: CBS’s Bryant Gumbel > for asking an obviously loaded question of an opponent of Attorney General > John Ashcroft’s nomination. The question was so biased as to leave one > wondering if there was anything left for the interviewee to say. It would > have been interesting to see him stumble for an answer beyond "Yes, you’re > right, Bryant. Now, back to you.” > Watch Out, Dan: Rush Is Back > > Limbaugh drew cheers when he announced that earlier in the day he had talked > by phone to his famous radio talk show host brother, Rush, "and he could hear > me.” Rush Limbaugh, in recent months, has been coping with going deaf. > Doctors reportedly are pleased that an implantation appears to be a success. > > Ending the evening’s proceedings, Media Research Center Founder and President > Brent Bozell III thanked Rather for supplying so much ammunition for the > award judges. > > Notwithstanding the fact that the mainstream liberal media have hurled vile > name-calling at MRC for its awards, said Bozell, "We’re pretty damned proud > of what we’re doing tonight.” > > Bozell also said that even though the liberal media establishment deserves "a > slap up one side of the head and down the other,” the networks are to be > commended for sacrificing hundreds of millions in advertising to provide > wall-to-wall coverage of Sept. 11. > > > > > *COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, > any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use > without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational > purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ] > > Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists! > Write to same address to be off lists! > > <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER > ========== > CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic > screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are > sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- > directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with > major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. > That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and > always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no > credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. > > Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. > ======================================================================== > Archives Available at: > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html > <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of > [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> > > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> > ======================================================================== > To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: > SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: > SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Om > <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
