-Caveat Lector-

>From http://www.counterpunch.org/schorcarlucci.html

}}}>Begin
February 1, 2002

The Strange Career
of Frank Carlucci

By Francis Schor

In the past few months there has been a rash of media reports on the
Carlyle Group, a private equity investment group with billions of
dollars of assets in the defense industry and a roster of directors
and consultants which includes not only well-known Reagan and Bush
appointees but also international figures like John Major, the former
Prime Minister of Great Britain, and Fidel Ramos, the former
President of the Philippines.

The Chairman of the Carlyle Group, Frank Carlucci, was not only a
former Secretary of Defense in the Reagan Administration, but a
Deputy Director of the CIA during the Carter Administration. In fact,
Carlucci's career in Washington provides some insight into the
intersection between foreign and domestic policy in the Cold War
years. Moreover, Carlucci's particular trajectory through the
government and into private industry reveals much about the meaning
and influence of the military- industrial complex in the past and
continuing policies of the United States at home and abroad.

A critical part of Carlucci's career was spent as a foreign service officer during the 
1950's and 1960's in such hot spots as the Congo and Brazil. He capped that foreign 
service career with a stint as Ambassador to Portu
gal from 1974-77, a key time in the history and development of the Portuguese 
revolution. Carlucci's navigation through these conflictual moments helps to situate 
the nuances of US cold war policies not only in these spec
ific countries, but throughout the world.

As the Second Secretary in the US Embassy in the Congo during the time of the reign 
and consequent assassination of Patrice Lumumba, Carlucci was intimately involved in 
the US efforts to overthrow Lumumba's government. In
 the recent cinematic reconstruction of the life and times of the Congo's first 
elected prime minister, Lumumba by Haitian director, Raoul Peck, Carlucci is depicted 
as being part of a meeting of US, Belgian, and Congo of
ficials plotting the murder of Lumumba. Claiming that this particular meeting was 
fabricated by the filmmaker, Carlucci did admit at a Washington premier of the film 
that US policy towards the Lumumba government was a bit
 "too strident."

The fact that CIA station chief Lawrence Devlin was under direct instructions from 
Secretary of State Dulles to seek the immediate removal of Lumumba is part of the 
historical record. There is even evidence to suggest tha
t the actual hit on Lumumba came from the White House at Eisenhower's suggestion. In 
fact, there was an assassin hired by the US government, equipped with chemical weapons 
from Ft. Detrick, to use against Lumumba.

When Lumumba was captured in December 1960 after fleeing from house arrest by a former 
supporter and later vicious dictator of the Congo, Colonel Joseph Mobutu, the CIA 
probably helped to arrange for Lumumba's transfer to
 Katanga province where Katangan and Belgian henchman murdered Lumumba and disposed of 
his body.

Meanwhile, Carlucci was attempting to placate Lumumba supporters and draw them into a 
new coalition government. In the confusions that ensued, Carlucci found himself under 
house arrest and at odds with Clare Timberlake, t
he US Ambassador to the Congo who did not favor any involvement with Lumumba 
supporters. Fortunately for Carlucci, Timberlake was relieved of his ambassadorial 
post and replaced by Kennedy appointees whose liberal politic
s allowed for certain compromises with indigenous forces in Africa who might still 
serve the anti- communist alliance while facilitating US economic interests in the 
region.

Although Carlucci wasn't around for the mess that followed in the wake of UN 
intervention and the continuing zigs and zags of US policy in the Congo, he did wind 
up in Brazil in time for the overthrow of the Goulart gover
nment. The CIA and State Department were actively engaged in funneling money to 
opponents of Goulart and setting the stage for the eventual military coup in March and 
April of 1964.

Beyond his populist policies that threatened nationalization of US subsidies, Goulart 
was seen by Washington as "soft on communism" and "pro- Castro," indictments enough to 
spell his doom and put in place right-wing milit
ary dictators who would outlaw any political or union dissent for years. As a 
consequence of the military coup and its entrenchment, Carlucci gained a reputation as 
a "tough-guy" with the American Defense Attach� in Brazi
l, Colonel Vernon Walters.

By the end of the 1960s Carlucci had returned to Washington to become part of Nixon 
Administration, going from the Office of Economic Opportunity in 1969-71 to the Office 
of Management and Budget in 1971-72. He then was a
ppointed Under Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare from 1972-74. Among the 
other key members of these departments of domestic pacification were Caspar 
Weinberger, who was a Carlucci mentor, and Donald Rumsfeld, a
former college buddy and wrestling mate from Princeton. Both Weinberger and Rumsfeld 
would later become, as would Carlucci, Secretaries of Defense. The bureaucratic 
imperatives honed in these cabinet positions would furth
er underscore the primacy of military Keynesianism in governmental policy.

After so many positions as an underling and gray bureaucrat, Carlucci burst onto the 
explosive stage of post-revolutionary Portugal as Ambassador. With the approval of CIA 
Deputy Director Vernon Walters and Henry Kissinge
r, Carlucci began immediately to ferret out potential communist sympathizers among the 
left- leaning young military officers who helped foment the revolutionary coup in 
Portugal in 1974.

However, unlike Kissinger, Carlucci was willing to work with Socialist Mario Soares 
not out of any sympathy for Soares' politics, but because from Carlucci's perspective 
Soares was the "only game in town" to prevent the m
ost militant leftists from assuming power in Portugal. Carlucci managed to convince 
President Ford of his approach by working directly through Rumsfeld who was, at the 
time, the White House chief of staff. Carlucci's pay-
off came when Soares won the Presidency in 1976, cementing ties with NATO and 
instituting IMF approved austerity measures.

Such successful machinations in Portugal earned Carlucci a position as Deputy Director 
of the CIA in the Carter Administration from 1978-1981. When insurgent forces in Iran 
and Nicaragua in 1979 toppled the Shah and Somoz
a dictatorships, Carlucci and the CIA had little ability to control the upheavals even 
though there were various clandestine efforts to thwart the revolutionary forces in 
these countries. On the other hand, the CIA certai
nly played a significant role in sponsoring anti-Soviet Mujaheddin, perhaps even 
suckering the Soviets into their disastrous campaign in Afghanistan.

Carlucci then made the transition to a procurer of new weapons as Deputy Secretary of 
Defense in the Reagan Administration under Caspar Weinberger from 1981-83. During this 
time, in response to wide-spread criticism of Pe
ntagon waste and mismanagement, Carlucci developed proposals (known as the "Carlucci 
Reforms") to rationalize the process of weapons procurement. However, Carlucci's 
policies did not lower costs. They did, apparently, off
er new start-up companies the opportunity to get involved in DoD pork, something that 
the Carlyle Group would take advantage of later on.

After a brief departure into the world of private business at Sears World Trade from 
1983-86, Carlucci returned to become first an Assistant to the President for National 
Security Affairs in 1987. He then went on to becom
e Secretary of Defense later than year until his resignation in 1989 when he went to 
work for the Carlyle Group.

As Secretary of Defense he worked closely with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and 
particularly the Chairman, Admiral William Crowe, Jr. (Crowe is now a chief 
stock-holder of the parent company of BioPort, the recently FDA appr
oved monopoly holder of an anthrax vaccine. The Carlyle Group also apparently has 
stock holdings in Crowe's company.) While overseeing some cutbacks in the DoD, 
particularly military bases in the US, Carlucci was committe
d to expanding certain military appropriations in the area of new technology as a way 
of strengthening the US national security state and expanding NATO. Although willing 
to compromise with Congress on the Strategic Defen
se Initiative (encountering in the process a rebuke from Reagan), Carlucci maintained 
a determined stance of US supremacy in nuclear arms and nuclear-war- fighting 
capability.

While outside of government in the 1990's, Carlucci managed to circulate on the boards 
of various think- tanks, e.g. the RAND Corporation, and help promulgate reports on 
national security and defense that urged increases
in defense spending and the use of US military might. Nonetheless, he, along with 
other former Secretaries of Defense, opposed sending ground troops to Bosnia, perhaps 
because there were no long-term prospects for securit
y or economic advancements.

Certainly, Carlucci's tenure at the Carlyle Group has resulted in an expanded 
portfolio of defense industries. Among the defense industries that Carlyle holds is 
United Defense, a maker of missile launch systems for the U
S Navy. However, Carlyle's reach under Carlucci has expanded into a variety of new 
technologies in defense and non-defense industries, such as global communications.

For example, Carlyle is keen on cleaning up hazardous materials at military bases and 
nuclear waste. Buying firms not yet publicly traded that deal with such services, such 
as Duratek and EG&G, allows Carlyle to position
these firms for government contracts and then cash in when they are publicly traded. 
Such influence-peddling is certainly not new to former government officials who use 
their ties to past and present administrations for p
rivate benefit.

Carlucci, of course, insists that he does not importune or lobby his old buddy Don 
Rumsfeld. Nonetheless, the money trail from Carlyle's portfolio to Rumsfeld's office 
at the Pentagon is pretty evident. In one major decis
ion by Rumsfeld, revealed by New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, United Defense's 
70-ton Crusader artillery system was saved from a potential budget cut. Surely, the 
proposed massive increase in spending for the Pentag
on by the Bush Administration will benefit the Carlyle Group.

What has seemed most egregious to inquiring journalists and public interest groups has 
been Carlyle's consultants, like former President Bush, whose ties to ruling elites in 
Saudi Arabia (including the Bin Laden family) a
nd South Korea have resulted in lucrative holdings and investments in these countries 
for Carlyle. As noted by the executive director of the Center for Public Integrity: 
"(Former President) George Bush is getting money fr
om private interests that have business before the government...And, in a really 
peculiar way, George W. Bush could, some day, benefit financially from his own 
administration's decisions, through his father's investments.
" In fact, George W. benefited in the past from Carlyle by being put on the board of a 
Carlyle investment, Caterair, an airline-catering company during his Texas business 
career days.

Similar to the Enron situation, the Bush family and others have enriched their careers 
and political fortunes with their ties to the Carlyle Group. However, this is a 
scandal that still hasn't gained the attention and mea
sures necessary to prevent its scandalous continuance.

Carlyle's cozy relationship with DoD insiders and other power-brokers is part of 
Carlucci's effective management of Carlyle. The global reach of Carlyle, while often 
hidden behind the veil of private investments, moreover
 is indicative of Carlucci's own experience with US imperial and military policies.

Like the subject of C. Vann Woodward's seminal study of racial oppression and 
exploitation in the South, The Strange Career of Jim Crow, Carlucci's "strange" career 
is representative of significant other pathological impe
ratives in US political culture. The residual effects and on-going
commitments to imperialism and militarism in US society feed such
opportunistic careerists as Frank Carlucci.

Until there is a massive movement to dismantle all of the
institutions and ideas that sustain US imperialism and militarism,
Frank Carlucci and his ilk will continue to profit and prosper at the
expense of the well-being and very lives of people here and abroad.

Francis Schor teaches at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan.
He can be reached at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to