-Caveat Lector-

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A337

2-2001Dec6

If you read this right away, the movie the Boston Strangler is on AMC at
10:15 PM EST.

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

DNA Tests Cast Doubt In Boston Strangler Case
Evidence Could Exonerate Longtime Suspect


By Guy Gugliotta
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 7, 2001; Page A02


A team of specialists using modern DNA analysis said yesterday it has found
new evidence that could exonerate Albert H. DeSalvo, long believed to have
been the notorious "Boston Strangler," in the murder of the strangler's 11th
and last victim.

The team said two DNA samples taken from the exhumed remains of Mary Sullivan
were not DeSalvo's, and it called on Massachusetts authorities to check the
samples against semen taken from the crime scene years ago.

"This evidence quite clearly indicates that Albert DeSalvo was not the
murderer," said team leader James E. Starrs, a lawyer and forensic scientist
from George Washington University. "The ball is in the bailiwick of
Massachusetts and Boston authorities."

The findings of the Starrs team raise new doubts in the long-running
controversy over 11 grisly, Jack the Ripper-like murders committed by a
serial killer who terrorized Boston between June 1962 and Jan. 4, 1964, the
date of Sullivan's death.

DeSalvo, a Boston handyman under indictment for rape, confessed to the crimes
in horrible detail, but physical evidence never connected him to the crimes.
He was sent to prison on unrelated charges and was killed by a fellow inmate
in 1973. The murder cases have remained open.

Sullivan's nephew Casey Sherman said at a news conference to announce the
team's findings that the family believes Sullivan's murderer "is still out
there." The findings "make me feel vindicated," he added.

Sherman said mismatched evidence in other cases suggests "if Albert DeSalvo
didn't kill Mary Sullivan, then Albert DeSalvo didn't kill any of these
women."

The Massachusetts attorney general's office said investigators working on the
Sullivan case have been stymied because the DeSalvo family will not provide a
blood sample for DNA analysis.

"There was semen recovered at the crime scene and we possess a quantity of
it," said Kurt Schwartz, chief of the criminal bureau at the the attorney
general's office. "If we could compare the semen to DeSalvo, it might tell us
a lot."

Sullivan, 19, was assaulted in her Boston apartment and strangled with a
stocking and two scarves. She was the youngest and last victim ascribed to
the killer branded by Boston newspapers as "the phantom fiend" and "the
strangler."

Police arrested DeSalvo in November 1964 and indicted him on 10 counts of
sexual assault unrelated to the murders.

Before trial, however, he told his attorney, F. Lee Bailey, that he had
killed the 11 strangler victims and two others. He was sentenced to life
imprisonment on the rape charges.

Sherman, a producer for the CBS-TV affiliate in Boston, said he became
interested in the case because of his family's doubts about DeSalvo's guilt.
He contacted Starrs, who assembled a team of specialists to conduct a DNA
investigation with the cooperation of the Sullivan and DeSalvo families.

The team exhumed Sullivan's body from the St. Francis Xavier Cemetery in
Hyannis, Mass., in October 2000, and DeSalvo's body in October of this year.

Starrs said that the team requested a copy of the original 1964 autopsy but
that Massachusetts authorities, "who have stonewalled us from the start,"
would not give it to them. Starrs said the team eventually obtained a copy
from a journalist.

Schwartz said his office refused the request because the Sullivan case is an
open investigation: "We have a single interest -- in solving a crime,"
Schwartz said. "They have been more interested in doing their own
investigation."

Team member Michael M. Baden, a New York-based pathologist, explained that
information from the 1964 autopsy clashed with DeSalvo's confession in
several important details.

DeSalvo said he killed Sullivan in the late afternoon, but the corpse was in
full rigor mortis when the medical examiner got to it, indicating death
before noon.

DeSalvo said he strangled Sullivan with his bare hands, but the 1964 autopsy
showed the strangler used clothing.

Baden said the Starrs team found intact a small horseshoe-shaped bone from
above Sullivan's Adam's apple. Strangling by hand usually damages or crushes
the bone.

Remains were sent to George Washington for DNA analysis by geneticist David
Foran, who examined samples taken from Sullivan's hair, fingernails, pubic
hair and a pair of black panties she wore when she was buried.

Foran said he compared DNA from the four sites to specimens taken from
Sullivan and DeSalvo, and found two suspicious samples -- from the panties
and from a semen-like film in the pubic hair.

Neither matched DeSalvo, he said, but the team concluded that one of two
suspicious samples may have belonged to the real murderer: "Intuitively it
seems consistent that the [evidence] was coming from her killer."

Starrs said "where the samples come from we cannot tell," but he called on
the attorney general's office to turn over its semen samples for comparison.
The Sullivan and DeSalvo families have a lawsuit pending against
Massachusetts investigators to gain access to the evidence.



*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
Write to same address to be off lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to