-Caveat Lector-

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>     There is only one way to deal with a power like Russia, and that
> is the
> fearless way. -
> Karl Marx [1853]
>
> <snip>
>
> BF>The John Birch Society has used Karl Marx's own anti-Russian
> tendencies in its
> one-sided drive to call neo-conservatives America's "greatest enemies"
> (you know,
> "false conservatives", "Marxists in disguise", etc.).  America's
> greatest
> enemies?  Greater than the Anglo-American Insiders?  Greater than the
> Stalinists?  Greater than even Luciferianism itself?  I am a former
> Trotskyist.
> I was one at a very young age, about seventeen we'll say.  I freely
> admit this.
> Now I talk about the influence of the Devil in rock music and old
> friends would
> probably roll their eyes (need I neglect classical music?).  People do
> change.  I
> am definitely not a neo-conservative, most neo-conservatives would be
> horrified
> by the thought that I would be.  However, I can acknowledge that
> change can occur
> in the thinking of those of us who do think.  I have become more
> conservative in
> some ways, if not in other ways, but I do remain an independent
> thinker.
>     Neo-conservatism advocates Pax Americana, which is a form of
> globalism at
> odds with Trilateralism and UN domination, both, and which exalts
> capitalism and
> democracy as deities.  It can be said to be a species of Trotskyism.
> Then again
> LaRouchianism can be said to be a species of Marxism and yet I would
> not confuse
> LaRouche with Gus Hall, or claim that LaRouche is America's greatest
> enemy.
> Enough about that...
>     It was confirmed to me in prayer that much of what this article
> says remains
> the truth.  Russia and China remain in a kind of conspiracy, appearing
> to
> disagree when it suits them.  Sino-Soviet split?  Sure.  At some level
> yes there
> was.  However, it was not as deep as we have been led to believe.
> Just keep the
> military aid to China going, you stupid yanks!  Kissinger was either
> deceived, or
> part of the agenda.  He might have been part of the agenda from a
> higher
> perspective of Insiders manipulating the Communists, but he was
> involved
> somehow.  It may be that Marxism was created by the Insiders in the
> United
> States, but the control only extended so far and the truth behind this
> allegation
> is a very complex one, involving a nineteenth century geo-politics
> that most of
> us would not understand in the context of the modern world.  America
> probably
> felt that its greatest threats came from the reactionary empires.
> Marx seemed
> democratic enough for Greeley and Lincoln.  Come to think of it. old
> Weishaupt
> seemed democratic enough for Jefferson and Paine.  Deception works
> that way
> folks.  It is not direct, and they do not have the benefit of
> hind-sight.  Today,
> ironically, those same reactionary states we feared strike a Left-wing
> pose and
> complain about American hegemony.  These same philistines take a
> one-sidedly
> position against Israel on behalf of a people they care little about.
> How
> strange.
>      Gorbachev is deeply in to all of this.  Ironically---this is
> beyond my
> understanding at this time-----he is also deep in to the western
> capitalist New
> World Order.  Theosophy is said to unite these forces in to one at
> some level.
> The Theosophical world government scenerio calls for nukes in the
> hands of the
> world government, to be used against any state threatening it.  This
> is happening
> as we speak.  Gorbachev may be a great hero for freedom on the
> outside, but there
> is a whole other agenda and it is disconcerting the influence he has.
> China may
> well be somewhat misled in all of this as they attempt to persue a
> nationalist
> path.  However, that nationalist path has as a milestone nukes aimed
> straight at
> where I live.  I find it hard to be sympathetic.
>     Remember Daniel Chapter 7.  We have a Lion with Eagle's Wings.
> OK, Cecil
> Rhodes and the Anglo-American power.  England and the United States.
> We then
> have the Russian bear, the Chinese leopard, and finally a
> super-structure that
> rules the world perhaps unknown at this time.  The Eagle's Wings are
> plucked.
> This is fact.  I hope I am wrong about the time frame.  I hope that
> these really
> only mean Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome.  I believe that I am
> right.  The
> Eagle, the United States, is plucked up, leaving England to rule the
> world alone
> having to share power with China and Russia.  England does not want
> this,
> contrary to LaRouchian propaganda.  England needs America to reign
> supreme, and
> remains attached to the eventual idea of ultimate re-unification.
> King George
> III was not a tyrant, nor is England without feeling.  King George III
> was
> authoritarian and not totalitarian.  He was out of date, and yes, the
> Revolution
> was certainly necessary as part of God's Plan.  In any case, England
> rules the
> world having to share power with two other nations.  Over them lies
> the control
> of the fourth beast, the three super-powers remaining as vassals to
> it.
>     What does this mean?  It is simple.  We are seeing the fufillment
> of Biblical
> prophecy before our eyes.  We cannot understand world events without
> that
> understanding.  If we look at this as Communism regrouping, we are
> only arriving
> at part of the truth.  It does not explain the role of radical
> right-wing Islam,
> or what calls itself that anyhow.  If we do not understand
> geo-politics as the
> fulfillment of Biblical prophecy, and also the fulfillment of the
> dreams of that
> which calls itself "Theosophy" (I understand that there are
> disagreements within
> the Theosophical camp, as well as the Bahai camp), we do not
> understand
> anything.  We certainly do not understand how Gorbachev has gotten the
> influence
> he has gotten, including, I believe, the inclusion of Russian troops
> as part of
> K-FOR.  I do not have all the answers here, and I hope I am wrong
> about the
> "Eagle's Wings" notion, but I need to warn the people of the
> possibilities or
> blood is on my hands.  A sign in San Francisco?  I probably would not
> dress as
> well as half the people with "End of the World" and "Feed the Masses"
> signs and
> probably not be as effective.  The only real hope is that our nation
> repent and accept the Seven Noachide principles, but that does not
> seem to be on the horizen.

    Bates

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to