-Caveat Lector-

> FYI
>
> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/2/17/125835.shtml
>
> WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!
>
> B-1B Bombers Slated For Retirement Hang On
> Dave Eberhart, NewsMax
> Monday, Feb. 18, 2002
> When Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld submitted his 2002 budget proposing to
> retire 33 B-1B bombers and consolidate the remaining 60 on two bases -- Dyess
> Air Force Base, Texas, and Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D, the home states of
> President Bush and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D. --
> congressional delegations from Kansas, Idaho and Georgia, states losing the
> aircraft, got busy.
> Led by Rep. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., congressional conferees on the Fiscal
> Year 2002 Defense Authorization Bill last week authorized the Secretary of
> the Air Force to proceed with reducing the B-1 fleet -- but only after
> providing Congress with reports on the service’s strategy for implementing
> the proposed reduction and consolidation.
>
> The conferees also provided $100 million for continued operations of the Air
> Guard B-1 fleet, as well as $95.5 million for B-1 modifications and $194.5
> million for B-1B research and development activities.
>
> Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has been strongly against any delay in the
> proposed B-1B retirements. From the Congressional Record:
>
> "Just as discouraging, given its pork barrel nature, is a provision that
> would delay the B-1B Lancer bomber force restructuring or downsizing at a
> cost of $165 million to U.S. taxpayers.
>
> "This provision has literally made it illegal for the Secretary of Defense to
> reduce, retire, dismantle, transfer, or reassign the Air National Guard B-1B
> bomber force by 33 aircraft until the following reports have been prepared:
> The National Security Review, the Quadrennial Defense Review, the Revised
> Nuclear Posture Review, the Secretary of Defense Report on the B-1B Bomber,
> the Bomber Force Structure Report, and a Comptroller General Report on the
> B-1B Bomber.”
>
> Old Issue
>
> Moves to trim the swept-wing bomber, originally designed to deliver nuclear
> bombs deep into Soviet territory, are not new. In 1996, the General
> Accounting Office suggested cutting 27 planes from the fleet and staging them
> on fewer bases.
>
> But the bomber has until now always managed to avoid the chopping block,
> despite a history of controversy and the grim statistic that of the original
> 100 B-1Bs, six have crashed.
>
> B-1s, operating from Missouri, dropped more bombs on Afghanistan than any
> other aircraft and have garnered recognition as a critical workhorse of the
> conflict.
>
> The B-1s flying over Afghanistan, however, have been upgraded from the
> versions that failed to perform in the Persian Gulf War. Over the last couple
> of years upgrades to the aircraft have increased the bomber’s weapons,
> navigation and communication capabilities.
>
> Furthermore, the bomber’s iron bombs were converted into "smart” weapons
> that use a global navigation system to target precisely. Eventually, the B-1
> was equipped with a towed decoy system that lures enemy missiles away from
> the aircraft.
>
> After President Ronald Reagan resurrected the bomber, the military purchased
> 100 B-1s at $200 million apiece. Originally delivered to the Air Force at
> Dyess in June 1985, the aircraft reportedly suffered from cracked landing
> gears, leaking fuel tanks and faulty engines. False images in the
> terrain-following radar and incompatibility with more advanced systems also
> troubled the B-1.
>
> But the Air Force reportedly corrected the problems over the years.
>
> War Record
>
> During Operation Desert Fox, the B-1 struck Iraqi military bases, and later
> the B-1 flew 100 combat missions against prime targets in Kosovo during
> Operation Allied Force.
>
> The aircraft’s nuclear weapons carrying role was terminated in 1997. However,
> a so-called nuclear "re-role plan” for the B-1B exists if they are ever
> required for nuclear war. In the meantime, B-1s cannot participate in nuclear
> exercises.
>
> Under the Rumsfeld plan, the $130 million saved from the cuts would be routed
> back into the B-1 program for upgrades and operational costs attendant to the
> remaining fleet.
>
> The additional dollars are needed to assuage what many critics in uniform and
> out have described as chronic under-funding of what is still the nation’s
> premier heavy bomber. At one point, an Air Force secretary reported that the
> B-1 program was $2 billion short of what it needed over a six-year period.
>
> "The Air Force has never supported the B-1 with the necessary parts and funds
> it needs,” said retired Col. Johnny Griffin, a former Dyess commander.
> Currently at Dyess, only 30 of the base’s 40 B-1s are fully funded.
>
> Once the reports required under the Chambliss compromise are filed, digested
> and approved, the 33 B-1’s slated for retirement will be stripped of parts
> and the carcasses sent to an aircraft bone yard in Arizona.
>
> *COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
> any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
> without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
> in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
> purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]
>
> Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
> Write to same address to be off lists!
>
> <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
> screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
> sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
> directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
> major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
> That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
> always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
> credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
>  <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>  <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to