-Caveat Lector- ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob1776 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 7:27 PM Subject: Electronic Spy in their car will charge drivers for traffic jams
We have got to turn this world around and back towards liberty and limited government. This article below is INSANE. We are heading for a police state/world. Below are 3 articles you MUST READ. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Steve To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: Spy in the car will charge drivers for jams Spy in the car will charge drivers for jams By Edward Simpkins (Filed: 24/02/2002) EVERY motorist in Britain will be monitored by satellite and charged for using busy routes under plans being presented by the Government's transport commissioner this week. Under the proposals cars would be fitted with a global positioning device and drivers billed for sitting in traffic jams. In a report to be published tomorrow, the Commission for Integrated Transport, chaired by David Begg, claims that the charges could reduce road congestion by up to 44 per cent, saving 219 million man-hours, without increasing the overall tax burden. The scheme would work by fitting all cars and lorries with a unit linked to a satellite covering the nation's road network. Drivers would be charged according to how busy the roads are and the time they are used. The scheme would be expected to raise �5.7 billion a year. Prof Begg, who was appointed to the commission three years after successfully introducing measures to curb car use in Edinburgh, where he was the city council's transport convenor, suggested that vehicle excise duty and fuel duty be reduced to compensate motorists for the charges on busier roads, making the scheme tax-neutral. He would prefer to see car tax scrapped altogether and fuel duty reduced by 2p per litre. He said the proposals would be introduced once the public transport improvements promised in the Government's 10-year Transport Plan had been delivered so that drivers priced off the road would have an alternative. Under the plan, an 80-mile journey from London to Rugby would cost �3.40. A journey of the same mileage on the M25 from Maidstone to Luton would cost �9.50. Someone who commuted from Brighton to Croydon would pay �14 per day, but Prof Begg says that the journey time would be cut by one-third to one hour, saving almost five weeks of working time per year. "Our starting point was that roads are the only public utility that is free at the point of use. As a result, everyone wants to use the most popular roads at the same time, causing gridlock," he said. Although decisions on implementing the plan will be taken by ministers, the Government has already mooted the possibility of using GPS technology to clamp down on speeding. Edmund King, the director of the RAC Foundation, the motorists' organisation, said that charging would work only as part of a package that included spending to remove bottlenecks from the road network and introducing better traffic management. "The other concern is that there would be obvious unfairness: drivers in rural areas would be much better off, whereas if you are a public-sector worker or on a lower income in the South-East you would be worse off," he said. The proposals could find favour with business, however. The Confederation of British Industry calculates that traffic congestion costs employers �18 billion per year in lost time and lost business caused by delays. Digby Jones, the director-general of the CBI said: "Reducing the multi-billion-pound cost of road congestion is a top business priority and making the way we all pay for road use fairer has to be part of the solution but the policy and practical implications are complex, as recent experience in London shows." Ken Livingstone, the mayor of London, is expected to say this week that he will impose a �5 charge on motorists entering the city centre from next year. Westminster city council is threatening legal action to block the move. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ BELOW ARE 2 MORE MUST READ ARTICLES The New Complaint of Portnoy By Israel Shamir | March 16, 2001 Israel Shamir is an Israeli writer and journalist. His articles The Rape of Dulcinea, The Test Failed, Galilee Flowers could be found on many Internet sites, www.thestruggle.org, www.antiwar.com, www.NileMedia.com etc. He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or write P.O.B. 23714 Tel Aviv 61236 The Viennese Jewish shrinks decided to disinvite the American Palestinian Professor Edward Said, who had been called to lecture them in memory of Sigmund Freud. The Professor had been seen throwing a stone towards an Israeli border. The psychiatrists said it speaks a lot about his subconscious. They would never throw a rock, as the wild Arab from Columbia University; they prefer Sharon's missiles. I think it is a right approach, and it should be applied not only to professor Said. In the far-away 1969, Phillip Roth decided to probe the subconscious of his contemporary American Jew. In the novel, Portnoy's Complaint, Roth's hero, Alexander Portnoy, lies on the psychiatrist's couch and tells of his inner feelings, domineering mother and adolescent sex. What would a modern Portnoy blubber on the newest reclining couch model 2001? We can find this out by turning towards the press. Philip Weiss [i] in the New York Observer noted that the Jews are to politics and media what the blacks are to basketball. The leading media powerhouses like the New York Times Corporation and the Washington Post are fully kosher, owned by Jews and a substantial majority of the editorials and the op-eds are written by Jews. They are representative of the Jewish American opinion. With a very few exceptions, they are supportive of Israel, its policies towards the Palestinians and its brave ruler, general Sharon. The situation in our land (Israel) is well known. The Jews rule supreme. The local non-Jewish inhabitants have few rights. The majority of them are disenfranchised. Their property is seized at will and their sources of independent livelihood are destroyed. Their cities are besieged, activists assassinated, women and children starved. They have no access to public media, to welfare; they are not allowed to even go to the beach. None of this is secret. It is freely discussed in the Israeli media. It would be a gross exaggeration to say that the Jews of Israel hate goys and wish them all gone. To borrow the expression of Conrad Black, the owner of British and Canadian newspapers, it would be 'a lie worthy of Goebbels'. Israel imports hundreds of thousands of goys and shiksas: Chinese, Thai, Romanians, Ukrainians, Russians and Africans. In just the last few months, the Israeli Ministry of Labour issued thousands of new permits for guest workers. The Jews of Israel welcome goys, as long as they have no rights, make no demands and agree to work for minimal wage. At the first objection, they are taken by force to the first plane back home. That is the country adored by William Safire, Tom Friedman and other Jews in the mainstream media. 'Tell me what you like, and I'll tell you what you are', goes the Latin adage. The pro-Israel position of the American Jews in the media is a good indication of their subconscious feelings towards the world at large. Their favourite neo-liberal globalist trend is but a tendency to turn the whole world, including the United States, into a Palestine with a small ruling class, big security machine and voiceless impoverished natives. But let us give their due to the gentlemen of the press. They could be worse. The more vocal part of American Jewry considers them rather soft. The US correspondent of Haaretz in Washington, Nitzan Horovitz, writes in today's edition (March 16, 2001), "The Israeli lobby in the US (AIPAC) is more intransigent [ii] than any government of Israel, including that of Sharon." It is a Jewish supremacist organisation, according to Yossi Beilin, an Israeli ex-minister who is not much of a liberal himself. What do they hate in Palestinians? The Palestinians have roots, they are living in harmony with their environment, they love their villages, they stick to their land, they can live without Jewish guidance. The Jewish supremacists wish to destroy their society, to confiscate their land and turn them into slaves sweating in the Jewish factories. If that is what Portnoy-2001 feels about Palestinians, why would he feel any different about other goys? A good Viennese shrink would pronounce him sick and possibly dangerous to his neighbours. He is as sick as any bigot of Ku Klux Klan, but much more influential due to his control over the media. What is the source of Portnoy's influence? Why did he change so much since 1969? Phillip Weiss explains it by the success of the Jews to break through the barriers, to enrich themselves and to occupy the commanding positions in the establishment. He writes, "I don't claim to know how Jewish the membership of the establishment is. Twenty percent, 50 percent? I'm guessing 30". Even 30% would be sufficient to promote any idea, if the other 70% have no interest in the subject. In many financial companies, a 10% controlling share is as good as total ownership, as the rest is divided among small shareholders. In the absence of solid statistics for the US, it is instructive to consider the economy of Apartheid-era South Africa. The Economist, hardly a 'hate publication', estimated that the Jews who constituted 0.03% of the population owned sixty percent of that rich country's market capitalization. All other players, Anglos, Boers, Indians and native Africans competed for the remaining 40%. The power of money is translated into the rule over the minds by the feudal structure of the media. At the peak, there are media lords, the proprietors. They delegate authority to their faithful retainers, the chief editors, who in turn, choose loyal soldiers. The structure does not stand alone, but links to the financial and trading structures, the main ad-suppliers. The ad-suppliers are more important than the readers. In England, the Daily Herald, a newspaper targeted at a working class constituency, went bankrupt. Although it had five times as many readers as The Times, it only attracted half the advertising revenues. Advertisements account for approximately 75% of the revenue of an average newspaper. In the case of Radio and TV broadcasters, that figure leaps to almost 100%. It is no wonder that the media is accountable to its 'paying' patrons, the privileged few who are members of an elite club. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, the media is not the message. The media is not a line of business, either. Lev Chernoi, a Russian-Israeli billionaire who sold his vast media empire to another Jewish tycoon, Mr. Berezovsky, put it concisely in a recent interview: "Media is politics". The media is a means of shaping public consensus; of swaying the consciousness of a nation. Once, the readership provided a feedback, not anymore. Ordinary people still own most of the body parts of America and they are the muscle, but the nerve system and the brain have been taken over by the club of media lords and the managers of finance and trade, a new dominant power in the world. They decide what Americans think. Americans enforce their decision how we should manage our planet, from the rain forests of the Amazon to the last besieged Palestinian village. The Club disposed with the pretense of the pluralism in press. Russian politicians and journalists visiting the US often express amazement at how in this huge and heterogeneous country the scope of expressed opinions is so narrow. "You succeeded where the communists failed", is a frequent refrain. Indeed, the differences between American newspaper coverage and TV News have all but disappeared. Noam Chomsky recently wrote, "the editors of the NY Times, and their brethren, have refused - not "missed," but refused to publish a single word about the sending of unprecedented numbers of military helicopters to Israel. Last week, the latest $.5 billion deal was struck between the Pentagon and the IDF for more advanced Apaches. They recognize how the (US) population is likely to react. To date, the total coverage of this massive transfer of public funds has been one opinion piece in a newspaper in Raleigh, North Carolina. I've actually attempted to personally contact editors I've known for years. No use. The discipline, and uniformity, are really impressive. People who thought that Stalin had reached the limits of totalitarianism are quite wrong". Well, Joseph Stalin had no such compliant media machine or the modern technology at his disposal. Its potential is not fully realized yet, as the three major networks plan to launch one united and unified news programme every night, to spread its message to every house in America. A painter Diane Harvey wrote in despair: "its main technique is through feeding the public an entire world-view made out of toxic substitutes for information and truth." The 360-degree, surround-sound World Lie most people believe is built and sustained by the non-stop flow of highly purposeful, integrated and carefully directed fabrications. The spirit of truth has departed, an upgraded version of global totalitarianism has been coalescing into a new death-grip on human freedom" [iii]. Paradoxically, this machine is vulnerable as it is too formidable. Subjugation and destruction of Palestine is but one of its applications. Do not ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for you, as no man is an island, said the Elizabethan poet, John Donne, proclaiming the common humanity of Man. These words sent Ernest Hemingway to fight for freedom in Spain in 1936, as freedom is indivisible. We repeated these words in 1968, we should repeat it now. The struggle for freedom in the US and the battle for Palestine are but one war. Whenever the Almighty sends a malaise, says a Jewish wisdom, He sends the cure for it. The cure lies in democracy [No, the cure lies in ridding the world of Jews; but one could hardly expect Mr. Shamir to reach the same conclusion]. The media should be returned to people, taken out of the rich men's hands. Israel/Palestine should be democratised, equal rights provided to Jew and Gentile alike. It would cure the New Complaint of Portnoy. [i] New York Observer, 22.01.01 [ii] In Israeli parlance, the Jewish supremacists are called 'right-wing', while national moderates are called 'left-wing', though this division has no connection to their social positions. [iii] http://www.rense.com/general8/harv.htm Israel Shamir is an Israeli writer and journalist. His articles The Rape of Dulcinea, The Test Failed, Galilee Flowers could be found on many Internet sites, www.thestruggle.org, www.antiwar, www.NileMedia etc. He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or write P.O.B. 23714 Tel Aviv 61236 ++++++++++++++++ THIS IS A VERY GOOD READ - Our Biggest Mistake Last week we talked about a number of especially egregious Jewish swindlers of the past decade. In every case they stole from Gentiles with the help of other Gentiles. I pointed out that the cases I discussed were illustrations of the general rule that the really big swindlers are nearly always Jews, and that they nearly always depend for their success upon the corruption of America's Gentile political and business elites. Corrupt Gentile businessmen help them steal, and corrupt Gentile politicians help them get away with it. There's a brand new case of a hugely successful Jewish swindler that I didn't have time to talk about last week: that's the case of Gary Winnick and the bankruptcy of his fiber-optics telecommunications company, Global Crossing. Winnick started Global Crossing just five years ago with a $35 million loan from some Jewish friends in the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. The next year, in 1998, after issuing himself 100 million shares of stock in his new company, he sold $735 million in shares to the public. In June 1999, shares in Global Crossing were selling at 62 � --$62.75 a share. That gave Winnick a personal fortune of more than 6 billion dollars --in just two years. That's amazing, isn't it? He went from nothing to the richest man in Los Angeles in just two years. He did it by spinning a tale about linking the whole world with a 100,000-mile network of fiber-optic cable and selling that myth to the media and to the public. But of course, linking the world with fiber-optic cable was not what was really on Winnick's mind. Raking in as much money as possible as quickly as possible with a lot of fast patter and sleight of hand was what was on his mind. He had learned his trade not as a fiber-optic network builder but as a fast talker working with his buddy Michael Milken selling junk bonds. Really, Winnick had worked in the same office with Milken in New York selling junk bonds. Even after Milken had been convicted and sent to prison, Winnick was able to scam the public and sell shares in his new company, Global Crossing. Of course, he didn't advertise his former association with Milken, and the media collaborated by not mentioning it either, even as Global Crossing became a high-profile, celebrity company in 1999. Winnick began unloading his shares when the price peaked in 1999 above $60. And of course, as always with these Jewish scams built on fast talk instead of on creative work, the bubble eventually burst. Last month Winnick's company filed for bankruptcy, declaring more than $12 billion in debt that it cannot pay. That's like stealing $12 billion from the public, from all the people to whom Global Crossing owes money, and then asking the government for protection. That's the fifth largest bankruptcy ever declared in America. Shares in Global Crossing are now selling on the stock exchange for about a nickel each. Global Crossing's employees who had their shares in 401k retirement plans were prohibited from selling their shares for five years, and have lost everything. While Winnick was unloading his stock in the company at $60 a share, his 17,000 mostly Gentile employees were locked in and had to go down with the ship. Does that sound familiar? Another characteristic Winnick has in common with Michael Milken and Andy Fastow is that he is a big contributor to Jewish charities --and especially to Israel. Two years ago, when Global Crossing still was flying high, Winnick gave $40 million to the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles so that it can open a branch in Jerusalem. A recent issue of the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles reports that despite the bankruptcy of Global Crossing, Winnick continues to give generously to Jewish institutions. From his sumptuous $90 million estate in Beverly Hills, a steady stream of multimillion-dollar gifts continues to flow to Hillel houses at various universities, to the Jewish Museum in New York, to the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, to the American Jewish Committee, to the U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington, and to a number of other Jewish groups and causes. But not to those 17,000 mostly Gentile former employees of Global Crossing who went down with the ship. As I said, it's amazing. It just shows what can be done with a little greed, a complete lack of scruples, and the help of the media and the politicians --and when one has a Gentile population that has been so thoroughly brainwashed by the media that it simply lets itself be fleeced repeatedly by these avaricious Jews without even a peep of protest lest it be accused of "anti-Semitism." Do you believe that there's a court in this land that will hold Winnick accountable for what he has done? If you do, then you're even more gullible than the folks he fleeced to get his $6 billion. No, Winnick will get clean away with it and will continue enjoying life on his $90 million estate and giving to his fellow Jews the money he took from us. Do we deserve any better? I think not. And I want to emphasize again, the super-swindlers we have discussed here --Winnick and Fastow and Rich and Milken and Boesky and Frankel and Weiss and the rest --are not crooks who just incidentally happened to be Jews and might just as well have been Gentiles: no, their criminal activity is an essential expression of their Jewishness. They did what they did because they are Jews. That's why nearly all of the really big swindlers, the most outrageously brazen swindlers, the super-swindlers, the ones who steal $6 billion in just two years --are Jews. This is something for the egalitarians to think about. It's something to be pondered by those who believe that all featherless bipeds are essentially the same, except for superficial cultural differences, and that, in particular, the only difference between Jews and Gentiles is that Jews have a somewhat different religious tradition from the rest of us. They believe that if a Jew is raised from early childhood in a Gentile family he will grow up indistinguishable from a Gentile in his behavior and his thinking, and that a Gentile raised in a Jewish family will grow up to be indistinguishable from the Jews around him. Jews themselves don't believe that. That's contrary to what their religion teaches them and to what they themselves feel. I don't believe it either. Of course, egalitarians also believe that men and women are essentially the same --or that they would be the same, except for the fact that our old-fashioned, male chauvinist society artificially forces men and women into different stereotypical roles. I think that fewer people believe that than believe that Jews and Gentiles are the same --except for the lemmings, of course, who will believe whatever they're told to believe. Which is to say, more independent thinkers accept the fundamental and all-pervasive differences between men and women than accept the fact that there are very important inborn differences between Jews and Gentiles. Actually, I believe that even many lemmings, despite their dutiful affirmation of whatever TV tells them, deep down inside don't believe that men and women are the same. Back to the differences between Jews and Gentiles: I mentioned inborn differences, but we shouldn't ignore the cultural differences, especially as expressed in religious differences. The Jews' religion is an expression of their racial character. It grew out of their character over a very long period of time. The Jews look back on nearly 6,000 years of history. To them this is the year 5762, and in fact, Jewish religious books actually are being printed now with this date in them. Of course, it's really their tribal history they trace back that far. It would be more accurate to say that their religion, in its present form, is about 3,000 years old. But the fact is that it is their tribal religion. They developed it themselves. It was never imposed on them from outside. And it is an intensely ethnocentric religion, a religion for Jews only. Compare that with the two other Semitic religions, Islam and Christianity, both of which are universalist. Muslims and Christians believe that their religion is for everyone. Anyone, regardless of race, who professes belief, can be a Christian or a Muslim. Christians send out missionaries to convert the lost. When Jews send out missionaries, it is only to bring strayed Jews back into the fold, never to convert those who are not already members of the "chosen" race. The Jewish religion reinforces character traits which already are embedded in the Jewish genotype. Neither Islam nor Christianity can do that to the same degree, because they didn't develop indigenously. My point is that Judaism strengthens and reinforces the traits that led Michael Milken, Andy Fastow, and Gary Winnick to be so enormously successful at getting other people's money into their pockets, but the traits were already there. They were born with them. And I can think of no Gentile who has been as successful at that sort of thing: that is at fast patter and sleight of hand, at selling myths for hard cash. And the reason is not just because of a religious difference. As I said, Jews and Gentiles are different, just as men and women are different, just as Whites and Blacks and Asians are different. In some cases, these differences are a good thing, and they work well together: as in the case of men and women, for example. As long as we have a properly structured society that takes account of these differences, a society that permits men and women to complement one another in a natural way rather than forcing them into unnatural competition, then the differences make us strong and healthy. When we pretend that the differences don't exist, however, as between Gentiles and Jews or between Whites and Blacks, we leave ourselves open to very bad and unhealthy things. In the case of Jews we leave ourselves open to exploitation of the sort we have just discussed. We pretend that there is no difference between them and us, and so we aren't expecting to be exploited. Our guard is down. And then we are exploited. It has cost us many, many more billions of dollars in welfare programs and law enforcement than even Michael Milken and his fellow tribesmen have swindled from us. As I mentioned last week, Michael Milken's myth cost us $500 billion when the savings-and-loan industry went bankrupt 15 years ago. Sumner Redstone's myth of equality already has cost us vastly more than that and eventually will cost us our very existence if we continue to be deceived by it. And of course, it's not just Redstone's myth. It's a myth spun by and propagated by Redstone's whole tribe. The myth of diversity, equality, unity, and all of the other labels in which it's packaged is being peddled to the American public through every medium the Jews control: through television and radio, through newspapers, through magazine advertising, through Hollywood films, and all the rest. "Multiculturalism is a wonderful thing," they all proclaim. "Diversity is our strength." "Keep our borders open, because the Browns and Yellows that are pouring into America really are the same as Whites, and we are a nation of immigrants." And of course, anyone who doesn't swallow the myth is a "hater." Any White person who stands up and says, "Hey! Multiculturalism is a bad idea. It's a nightmare. It's wrecking America," is attacked. Pushing the idea that we ought to keep our borders open is a large-scale effort involving a very substantial portion of the Jewish community in America. Ramming multiculturalism down our throats is a joint effort involving virtually all of the mass media, and that means virtually all of the Jews in positions of control or ownership in the media, from Hollywood to Madison Avenue. Spinning and selling the poisonous myth of equality is an effort supported by nearly every Jew, not just a few evil master mythmakers. To be sure, just as in the financial swindling of America, this ideological swindling of America has had plenty of Gentile collaborators and co-conspirators. And I'm not referring only to the lemmings who parrot back whatever nonsense about equality and the wonders of diversity they have absorbed from television; I'm talking about the Gentile politicians and businessmen and teachers and preachers and publicists who know better, but who for one reason or another went along and still are going along with the Jewish campaign to multiculturalize America. Despite these collaborators and co-conspirators, however, it is clear that it has been Jewish Hollywood and Jewish Madison Avenue that have pushed the poison from the beginning and without which the campaign never would have been able to do the damage that it has done. Although VH1 owner Redstone and his Hollywood pals like to label me a "Holocaust denier," I'm really not. I don't deny that there was a campaign by the Germans before and during the Second World War to get the Jews out of their country and off their backs, and that during the war many Jews perished in the concentration camps and labor camps into which they were herded. What I deny is many of the details, such as Jewish lampshades and soap. The Jews, as they do with everything where they see the possibility for a good swindle, spun a myth about what had happened to them, and they sold that myth to the Gentiles. They took the basic fact that the Germans wanted the Jews out of their society and to that end put many Jews in concentration camps, and they embellished that fact with a great many lies about lampshades and soap and gas chambers and medical experiments, and that myth became the "Holocaust." They used their grip on our news and entertainment media, which was very strong even before the Second World War, to sell to the American people their myth about the terrible mistreatment of innocent and inoffensive Jews by beastly Germans. And as is nearly always the case they had plenty of corrupt Gentile politicians willing to collaborate with them. The result was that they got us to go to war to save them from Hitler. We made an alliance with the communists, with the Soviet Union, for that purpose, and we killed millions of our own people, millions of our fellow Europeans, but we saved the Jews. And look at what the Jews have done to us since the war to express their gratitude for being saved from Hitler! They have deliberately and with malice aforethought multiculturalized us. They have opened our borders to the Third World. They have given us feminism and Affirmative Action and gangsta' rap. They have promoted homosexuality as a "normal" lifestyle. And Sumner Redstone, with his VH1 and his CBS network and his MTV, has been at the forefront of that particular campaign of genocide against us. And they have descended on us like a swarm of locusts with every sort of scam and swindle imaginable, fleecing us of hundreds of billions of dollars, a la Milken and Weiss and Fastow and Winnick. The damage the Jews have done to America since 1945 far, far outweighs the damage done to the Jews by the Germans between 1933 and 1945. And the eventual death toll among our own people before we have cleaned up the mess the Jews have made of America will far exceed their losses during the so-called "Holocaust." We Americans have made some big mistakes, but really, going to war against our own kinsmen in Europe in order to save the Jews from Hitler was our biggest mistake. <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
