-Caveat Lector-
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : The Balkans
The Hague Tribunal: Milosevic charges NATO with war crimes
Part One
By Chris Marsden
28 February 2002
Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author
This is the first of a three part series dealing with the trial of former Yugoslav
President Slobodan Milosevic at The Hague.
On Tuesday, February 12, proceedings opened in the trial of Slobodan Milosevic at
the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague.
For the next two days, the prosecution team led by Carla Del Ponte offered its
introductory remarks in the indictment of the former Yugoslav president for war
crimes in Croatia, Bosnia, and Kosovo.
Afterwards, in what was obviously highly politically embarrassing for the ICTY and
the Western powers, Milosevic�s defence statement presented a legally impeccable
rebuttal of the charges against him. Milosevic then turned the tables on his accusers
by arguing cogently that the main responsibility for the eruption of ethic conflict in
the
Balkans rests with the United States, Germany and the other NATO powers and that
it is they who should in fact be charged with war crimes.
Milosevic was naturally keen to present himself in the best possible light at all times
and no objective observer of Balkan events over the past two decades would fail to
acknowledge that he shares political responsibility for the tragic events of the 1990s.
But the fact remains that his version of what took place contains far more truth than
the equally self-serving account presented by the Western governments that
provides the political underpinnings of the present trial.
In opening the prosecution argument, del Ponte said that the ICTY was based on the
application of �international humanitarian law�. Milosevic was being prosecuted �on
the basis of his individual criminal responsibility�, and �No state or organisation is
on
trial�. �This is a criminal trial,� she went on and the prosecution would not respond
to
Milosevic�s attempt to �make interventions of a political nature�.
These gyrations are extraordinary. How can Milosevic be on trial simply as an
individual, given that he is being charged precisely because he was a former head of
state? Moreover, who but the wilfully na�ve could possibly accept the non-existence
of a political dimension to the most high-profile trial in the world today?
Del Ponte attributed the entire tragedy of the breakup of Yugoslavia to the personal
ambition of Milosevic. Her attempt to do so reached bizarre dimensions. Milosevic
was neither nationalist nor racist, she said. Rather, �Beyond the nationalist pretext
and the horror of ethnic cleansing, behind the grandiloquent rhetoric and the
hackneyed phrases he used, the search for power is what motivated Slobodan
Milosevic.�
Senior Trial Attorneys Geoffrey Nice and Dirk Ryneveld followed up with an outline of
the charges against Milosevic, listing various examples of killings and atrocities in
Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo.
In order to make Milosevic directly responsible for crimes that were mostly attributed
to various Serbian irregular forces, and less often to soldiers serving in the regular
army, Nice simply insisted that Milosevic must have known what was happening and
was therefore culpable.
Beginning with the indictment on Kosovo, Nice accused Milosevic of poisoning the
political atmosphere through repressive acts and inflammatory nationalist speeches.
Nice did acknowledge the emergence of a separatist movement within the ethnic
Albanian population in the late 1980s. But as regards terrorist violence by the Kosovo
Liberation Army (KLA), he gave this an apologia by stating his surprise that �the
reaction of Kosovo, or of the Kosovo Albanians, was as muted and peaceful for a
time as it was.�
Nice played a clip from a speech by Milosevic on June 28 1989, celebrating the
600th anniversary of the Battle of Kosovo, highlighting just one statement: �Six
centuries later� today�we are once again fighting battles and faced with battles.
They are not armed battles, although such battles are not excluded either.� The fact
that Milosevic did not exclude �armed battles� was meant to associate him with what
followed in the next years.
Nice then gave a highly truncated chronology of the subsequent breakup of
Yugoslavia and the conflict that ensued. He insisted that the unifying thread between
the conflict in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo was Milosevic utilising ethnic cleansing to
carry out his �aim or objective of control and domination by Serbs over territory with
different co-perpetrators who were all part of a common plan.� In Croatia, everything
carried out by the army, the Territorial Defence units of the Krajina and of Slavonia,
the Territorial Defence of Serbia and of Montenegro and �a broad array of
paramilitaries� was supposedly done as part of Milosevic�s �plan�. �The evidence
shows that the forces I�ve cited operated together towards a single goal at the
direction of this accused�, alleged Nice.
When dealing with Bosnia and the charge of �genocide�, Nice made sure all possible
bases were covered. In order to avoid any reference to the disputed figures
regarding Serbian atrocities, Nice simply alleges, �the accused intended to destroy
the Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat communities in part, which is in accordance
with the definition of genocide�. He continued, �Alternatively, that genocide was the
natural and foreseeable consequence of the joint criminal enterprise forcibly and
permanently to remove non-Serbs from the territory under control. Alternatively, the
accused was an accomplice and he knew that some of the perpetrators were
committing genocide and he undertook acts which assisted in their commission.
Further or alternatively, as a superior within the meaning of Article 7(3) of our
Statute, he knew or had reason to know that genocide was about to be committed or
had been committed and did not prevent or punish the perpetrators thereof.�
[Emphasis added throughout]
With such a list of widely different alternatives, it is not necessary to prove that
Milosevic was directly responsible for any atrocities. He should have known that this
was an inevitable consequence of his policies even if the acts were committed by
others whom he formally did not command. By defining the crime of genocide as
destroying a people �in part�, the awkward fact of the actual numbers killed�the size
of the part, or how they were in fact killed; whether there was anything comparable to
the Nazi concentration camps or the type of wholesale ethnic slaughter in
Rwanda�is avoided.
Finally, as an additional insurance against having to prove any actual connection
between Milosevic and any one of the alleged war crimes, Nice stated; �The
Prosecution will assert and does assert that this accused took pains to conceal his
participation in the enterprise. However, the Bosnian Serb leadership and military
could not have done what they did without his massive ongoing informed
assistance.� For, as Nice later admits; �We accept that our proof against this
accused, certainly at this stage, for complicity in these awful events is via his
support
for the Republika Srpska [the Serbian enclave in Bosnia Herzegovina�CM] and via
his support for its army. We do not, of course, exclude the possibility of being able
to
go further in due course.� In other words, the prosecution has no proof, other than
the say so of its paymasters in Washington and other Western governments.
As further proof that Milosevic should be found guilty of war crimes, the supposedly
non- political prosecution cited then US Secretary of State Eagleburger in a
December 16, 1992 press release. �Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic and the
leader of Bosnian Serbs must answer �in a court of law, I would hope,� for atrocities
committed by military and detention camp commanders in shattered Yugoslavia...
The fact of the matter is that we know that crimes against humanity have occurred,
we know when and where they occurred. We know, moreover, which forces
committed those crimes, and under whose command they operated.�
And the guilty parties, Eagleburger made clear in the same release, were Milosevic
and Radovan Karadzic, leader of the Bosnian Serbs. Having quoted this, Nice added,
�Well, this Tribunal is only concerned, perhaps tangentially, with the workings of
politics. Let there be no doubt, first, this accused was already being identified,
well-
identified for complicity; but second, and the point of irresistible importance in this
case, he was on notice from the highest authority of his duty to comply with
international law.� This is astonishing, in that Milosevic is charged with not doing
what
Eagleburger (�the highest authority�) tells him to do and he is to be deemed guilty
because Eagleburger says he is! And this statement is made by a man in the course
of denying any political bias.
Milosevic became one of the prime guarantors of the 1995 Dayton Accord ending the
Bosnian civil war and worked closely with the US in its implementation. This was why
the initial indictment against him focused exclusively on Kosovo, otherwise the US
and European powers would have great difficulty in explaining why they had decided
to deal so directly with an alleged war criminal.
Unfortunately for the West, the case against Milosevic in Kosovo was considered so
poor that charges relating to Croatia and Bosnia were hastily added. But this meant
that the obvious political anomaly has once again been placed at centre stage. And
how does Nice deal with this? With unabashed sophistry: �It may be that he was the
person who impressed international negotiators with charm or even seeming
reasonableness and moderation, even if appearances were different from what was
revealed on the ground... But of course, whatever decisions the accused made in
1995 have no effect on his involvement in what was done...�
So the US and European politicians and their top military brass were simply na�ve
dupes of the wily Milosevic, who hoodwinked them with his inexhaustible reservoirs
of charm like a modern- day Cary Grant.
Finally, the prosecution turned to Kosovo, where the war is portrayed as the sole
result of aggressive Serbian nationalism and excessive repression carried out at
Milosevic�s behest against the KLA. As an example, Nice singled out the so-called
Racek massacre, which was the pretext for Western intervention, but then
acknowledged that the incident, �doesn�t feature in the allegations reflected in the
indictment�. This omission is for the simple reason that there is no concrete proof
that a massacre ever took place!
The prosecutions other allegation was that Milosevic had organised the so-called
�internal displacement� of 200,000 Kosovo Albanians as a specific form of ethnic
cleansing. That is, Milosevic did not initially evict ethnic Albanians from the
country,
but the fact that there was a movement of the population during a time of civil war is
supposed to be proof of ethnic cleansing.
Nice concluded with an assertion so bizarre that Chris Carter would have balked at
using it as a plotline for the X-Files. Milosevic had �brought upon himself� a war with
NATO because it �provided him with the opportunity� to expel the Albanians from
Kosovo, �while purporting to defend his country�. In any case, according to Nice�s
twisted logic, �Even if there was no devious plan of the kind I summarise, as many
think, to lure external violence on Kosovo to justify pushing the Albanians out, the
doing of it when it happened is without excuse or justification of any kind and would
remain offences as described in this indictment.�
Ryneveld then took the floor to assert, �the trial before you today is primarily a
deportation case�. By this he meant �over 800,000 Kosovo Albanian civilians had
been forced from their homes by Serb forces and had to flee to neighbouring states�.
Serb forces being a catch-all covering �the forces of the FRY [Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia]; Yugoslavia, the republic; and of course the MUP [Ministry of the
Interior]; the police; and certain paramilitary groups.�
He spoke of thousands of deaths, but qualified this with the rather strange
admission, �it must be said that there was an armed conflict ongoing in Kosovo
between the FRY and Serb forces, on the one hand, and the Kosovo Liberation
Army, or KLA, on the other hand. Further, it must be said that in terms of armed
conflict, it is an unfortunate, disturbing, but inescapable fact that people are
killed.
Undoubtedly, during this particular armed conflict, certain armed combatants from
both sides of the conflict were killed as legitimate casualties of war. The fact that
people die during times of war does not necessarily signify that a war crime has been
committed.�
This is the most defensive formulation imaginable. Instead of genocide, we have a
�deportation case� and an admission that many of the casualties on all sides in
Kosovo were soldiers killed in combat or casualties of war, rather than victims of
Serbian war crimes (naturally no reference is made to possible war crimes by any
other ethnic group).
With regard to the role played by the NATO bombing campaign in forcing the
subsequent mass exodus of ethnic Albanians, the prosecution simply insisted that
Albanian witnesses, i.e. Milosevic�s political enemies, will tell you that the vast
majority of refugees fled their homes because of the attacks by Serb forces and not
because of NATO bombing.� To back up allegations that Serb forces pursued a
deliberate policy of rape, witness testimony would be �in closed session or by way of
pseudonym and facial distortion,� thus leaving no means of checking the voracity of
such evidence.
Copyright 1998-2002
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
