-Caveat Lector- http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/pent.html ----- Independent Flight 77 - Pentagon Event Investigation
Critical Thinking: Emerging Theories ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brief Statement I hope it is understood that I mean no disrespect to the grieving loved ones of those lost on Flight 77 and at the Pentagon on S-11. I respect your hardships fully. I feel that I should make a small statement here since this is getting some rather heavy traffic. I began this project in response to the Hunt the Boeing site, a French research effort into curiosities regarding the Pentagon crash site and the 'official line'. I was intrigued, but offended by the hostile tone of the presentation. I felt I had some more benign theories to answer complicated questions of my own. I began discussing them on the American Patriot Friends Network since that's where I learned of the French site. It's been non-stop since that moment. The suspicious timing of the Pentagon data release, within just hours of the developing discussions on APFN is rather curious. I expect input and contributions from visitors. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] There is indication that there exists actual home-video shot and aired on the news the day of the event showing a Boeing 757, presumably Flight 77, flying and impacting the Pentagon. I accept my theory being defeated - Please help me see this video; I can't find it. -Thanks in advance This is a work in progress enjoy... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Critical Thinking Emerging Theories: Flight 77 So, if Flight 77's transponder was off, then what evidence do we have that it was, in fact Flight 77 that caused the Pentagon event? Questions like this kept me out of the good schools. What is implied is that opportunities for deception will be seized if it serves a purpose. The purpose, to hide a captured airliner with terrorists on board. Unless shown otherwise, we will continue to operate under the assumption that the original theory is accurate, mainly Flight 77 was clandestinely recovered, the terrorists captured and the civilians under a 'witness-protection' program. FOX News aired a special on S-11, as it happened I don't have the reporters' names, but here are the quoted notes I took regarding the situation in DC as S-11 was unlodling "Sharpshooters with anti-aircraft missiles are on the White House (roof). ...plane perhaps going down... another large airliner apparently... not sure whether an aircraft..." Something hit the Pentagon, the stories and theories are plenty, but we think that there was a legitimate accident there, which gave a CONVENIENT cover to the fact that Flight 77 was 'missing/recovered'. A new element I discovered indicates there were 'escorts' reported in the area. If it turns out to actually be Flight 77 that was responsible for the Pentagon event then I will revise my postings as just an anatomy of an investigation with the truth and the path to it for all to check out... Elements of the official story are well known. Tough questions - raw data for raw nerves... Here are a set of dramatic Pentagon shots. The first is from Life Magazine's The Year in Pictures September 11, 2001 Before and After, p.80-81, credit to Daryl Donley/Sipa. What do we see? To the left - blast debris and effects. To the right - enclosed area with truck and major smoking. The middle - main fire region with what look like 4 curiously undisturbed cable spools. What we don't see - a Boeing 757. Next, an Image found online, with AP credit to Will Morris. What do we see? Plenty of blast and debris effects, a burning car in the foreground with looks like an 'astro-van' or some sort of SUV engulfed in smoke behind. What we don't see - a Boeing 757. Next, an image from the same .mil server as the wide shot of the Pentagon above http://jccc.afis.osd.mil/images/images.pl?Lbox=defenselink.Pentagon_Attack check it out - you can download some very high resolution and quality images. Anyway, I just wanted to illustrate a different angle of view for the blast effect. If you look near the bottom, left of the vertical water stream and first responders, there are some heavily damaged support structure beams twisted like branches, maybe wing structure? (easier to see on the high res version, see zoom below). Not quite sure what that's part of, but I still don't see any Boeing 757 wreckage. This is the debris field to the left of impact/collapse zone, claimed to be the final remains of Flight-77, I see file cabinets, desks and stuff and assume this is internal matter from the building - yes there were people working in there, so I expect careful recovery crews. (I think the impact happened to the 'RIGHT' of the collapse zone. The angle'd nature of the impact, having momentum to the left, with respect to the normal of the Pentagon face, would throw debris to the left with general compromise of the structure to the left. The dynamics seem consistent, but someone will correct me if I'm wrong.) This is the truck enclosure that was burning above The full-size image can be accessed at: http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/Sep2001/010914-F-8006R-002.jpg Imaged on September 14 by the USAF s Tech. Sgt. Cedric Rudisill View some more very high res close-ups of the damage * damage1: zoom in on Pentagon wide shot, note truck enclosure which was burning above * Quit Hell!!: don't know what it means - note: the men working underground (right end) - I figure with the empty cable spools and all, that underground construction was uderway in the area. * These images and more can be accessed at http://jccc.afis.osd.mil/images/images.pl?Lbox=defenselink.Pentagon_Attack * DefenseLINK News Photos Pentagon S-11 Below we see an image from one of the Frenchi research sites with an overlay * people who understand structures and collisions speak out FOX NEWS AIRS SECURITY CAM FOOTAGE OF PENTAGON EVENT. MSNBC web coverage Below we see the before and after zoom of the object in motion. We can see the white smoke/dust trailing behind the object in both pictures. Damage? or kicking up dust from the ground, being so low? Looks like it did hit the Pentagon at an angle, but the path looks level, and almost in flat lateral motion with respect to the image plane of the camera, maybe 30 degs or under. Right, is a .gif animation of the frame sequence submitted by Dave Bosankoe http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/). Time code on the frames: http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/aa77/photo.shtml Frame 1 - 17:37:19 - object Frame 2 - 17:37:19 - impact Frame 3 - 17:37:21 - blast Frame 4 - 17:37:22 - blast Frame 5 - 17:37:23 - blast Because the object frame (1) and impact frame (2) have identical timecodes, no accurate estimates can be made. We can tell it's under a second? I'd like to see frames 17:37:18 and 17:37:20. Actually, I'd like to see a whole sequence with SMPTE timecode. Let me run it through the editor. * Nice profile shot of an F-16 * Wreckage of downed F-16 Serbia 3 pt. view of Boeing 757-200 Just for fun, I ran a websearch on DRAGONFIRE since the .gov mentioned it as a code-word The above picture is a bit misleading... It was hastily constructed to illustrate relative sizes only. The black of the illustrated F-16 canopy overlays on a black structure on the image as I postioned it, this was not intentional. THIS IS NOT TO IMPLY THAT THE BLACK IS THE CANOPY. Careful examination of the frames shows the black area on both the object and impact frames. I conclude this is a landmark, probably a tree in the distance. What might be a canopy is the lighter/white area just to the right of the black area; my thinking is that it is reflecting sunlight. Looking at the "smoke" trailing behind the oject, its source seems to be not necessarily from the rear of the object, but quite possibly from where I would estimate an engine under the left wing. I'll post another enhanced version with pointers to estimated structures soon. The Pentagon: Official Picture WHERE DO I THINK THE HELIPORT TOWER IS? WHERE DO I THINK THE IMPACT POINT IS? HOW DO I THINK THE ANGLES MATCH UP? I read with interest your [APFN] article titled: Military Video Of Flt 77 Hitting Pentagon - Critics See No Plane (an rense.com) You'll be interested to know that I was watching the events of 911 on tv, live and Dan Rather (could have been Peter Jennings) had an eyewitness to the plane that allegedly hit the pentagon. He clearly stated that it was a small commuter plane like a cessna 172 or a small private jet. Soon after all the news media reported flight 77 had hit the pentagon and this EYEWITNESS' testimony was never even brought up again. If I was a reporter even worth a dime I would call this eyewitness back and at least verify what he in fact saw. But they never did. To my knowledge, he's never been talked to since. I'm not saying it WAS this low flying small plane that hit the Pentagon, or even that it's not flight 77. I'm just saying it's curious that they didn't even ask the question that morning of WHY there was apparent confusion between the eyewitnesses and the government position (that flight 77 hit the Pentagon). Of course if flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon, then where is it? Was it shot down elsewhere? Anyways, thanks for the article... Dave "Dave Nesbitt" - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cessna 172 - FAA Aging Aircraft Below we see a piece of wreckage claimed to be from Flight 77, credit to Mike Faram from Navy Times There is some discussion going on regarding more video footage from other cameras in the area, confiscated by the FBI. This is coming from Gertz File My response is we will never get to see 'clearer' footage of the event UNLESS it was actually Flight 77 that is responsible for the event. Conjecture is, they won't produce anything because there was no Flight 77 imaged near the Pentagon. Again; if Flight 77's transponder was off, then what evidence do we have that it was, in fact Flight 77 that caused the Pentagon event? URGENT REQUEST: PENTAGON EVENT INVESTIGATION We are making an urgent request to 3D modelers and animators to help assist this effort. I'm not good enough with LightWave yet to whip out what I want, I just started with it. Basically, we're looking for a 3D visualization of the event showing relative objects and scales. * REQ: Model of Cessna 172 * REQ: Model of F-16 * REQ: Model of Boeing 757 * REQ: Model of Pentagon (terrain and structure maps can be found at spaceimaging.com) * Camera coverage must include security cam POV - lens and FOV must be taken into account * Camera coverage must include overhead POV to illustrate trajectories * Comparative scales of F-16/Cessna/Boeing need to be maintained and emphasized * Impact and explosion effects need not be emphasized Flight 77, the only flight to turn its transponder off and follow a curious and structured flight path Remote Recovery of Aircraft Technology Boeing 757-200 Background A fully integrated flight management computer system (FMCS) provides for automatic guidance and control of the 757-200 from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing. Linking together digital processors controlling navigation, guidance and engine thrust, the flight management system ensures that the aircraft flies the most efficient route and flight profile for reduced fuel consumption, flight time and crew workload. The precision of global positioning satellite system (GPS) navigation, automated air traffic control functions, and advanced guidance and communications features are now available as part of the new Future Air Navigation System (FANS) flight management computer. NASA Boeing 757 GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) USE FOR ALL-WEATHER LANDINGS The aviation industry is investigating the use of differential GPS concepts for precision landings in bad weather to improve the safety and reliability of air travel. The GPS is a constellation of 24 satellites used to determine aircraft position anywhere on or near the Earth. When a ground-based GPS receiver is used to provide a 'differential' correction signal, an aircraft��s position can be determined within a foot or two. Boeing partnered with NASA to examine GPS Landing System concepts and evaluate their accuracy, integrity, and continuity of function in automatic landings of airplanes. The team tested several prototype GPS Landing System concepts using NASA 557 during 226 automatic approaches and landings. The data obtained is being used to validate GPS Landing System simulations and to define system certification requirements. * Boeing Evaluates GPS Landing * Raytheon to Develop Joint Precision Approach and Landing System * Air Force Fact Sheet on Global Hawk unmanned aircraft technology * FAS information on Global Hawk unmanned aircraft technology * Northrup Grumman: Global Hawk * Home Run Technology - electronic, remote control of commercial aircraft * This site explores more inconsistencies with Flight 77 9:36 National Airport instructs a military C130 (Golfer06) that had just departed Andrews Air Force base to intercept and identify it. Golfer06 reports it is a B767, moving low and very fast. - DO WE HAVE CONTOLLER AUDIO ON THIS??? I WON'T BE CONVINCED WITHOUT VISUAL EVIDENCE OR A CONTINUAL RADAR TRACK WITH CONTOLLER AUDIO. STILL LOOKING FOR CORROBORATING, RELIABLE WITNESS TESTIMONY HERE'S A QUESTION FOR ANYONE: WHO WAS THE FIRST TO REPORT FLIGHT 77 IMPACTED THE PENTAGON??? mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * TYPICAL WITNESS REPORT But Velasquez slammed down the receiver and raced outside when he felt the gas station he supervises suddenly begin to tremble from a too-close airplane. "It was like an earthquake," the Costa Rican native said last week. What Velasquez felt above him almost within touching distance was American Airlines Flight 77 just seconds before impact. ...Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film." - REPORTER ASSUMING FLIGHT 77??? * Pentagon Investigation Progress, Relief Work Goes On: "The data boxes, recovered at about 4 a.m., were immediately turned over to the FBI." (more on data boxes) - AND WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM THESE DATA BOXES??? * WND asks 'So where is the plane? * Scoop Challenges Frech Site: Flight 77 Mystery A Disinformation Campaign * What Really Happened * Hunt the Boeing: The French site that started it all * Another French site with more (different) pictures... Shifting gears to the List Were These Men Captured? American Airlines Flight 77 Hijackers http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/WTC_suspects.html The following have been named as the men who hijacked AA Flight 77, which left Washington's Dulles International Airport bound for Los Angeles before being flown into the Pentagon. * (1) Khalid Almihdhar * Possible residences: San Diego and New York. * Listed as a passenger in seat 12B. A Yemeni national who is known to have met in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia with a senior aide to terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden who was a principal suspect in the bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen. According to a law enforcement source, the CIA transmitted the information about Almidhar to the FBI and the Immigration and Naturalization Service and his name was placed on the INS watch list. However, he had already entered the United States by the time his name was placed on the list Aug. 24. The FBI has obtained the phone records from his mobile phone. * Newsweek reports the FBI had begun searching for Almihdhar before the attacks. The INS reportedly checked its databases and realized that he and associate Salem Alhazmi had entered the United States earlier in the year on business visas, giving a Marriott Hotel in New York as their address. The INS also learned the two men had entered the country in 2000 and had listed a Los Angeles hotel chain as their address. * One of five hijackers who worked out at a Gold's Gym in Greenbelt, Md., for a few days in September. The Associated Press quotes an instructor at Sorbi's Flying Club in San Diego as saying Almihdhar was interested in flying large planes, particularly Boeings. * Almihdhar was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the indictment against Zacarias Moussaoui. * THIS MAN IS SAID TO BE ALIVE - WHO WAS ON FLIGHT 77? (bbc) * (2) Nawaf Alhazmi * Possible residences: Fort Lee, N.J., Wayne, N.J., and San Diego, Calif. * Spent time in Chechnya with Salem Al-Hamzi. The Associated Press reports a flight instructor at Sorbi's Flying Club in San Diego said Al-Hamzi trained in a twin-engine Cessna in May 2000 with Khalid Almihdhar. They were interested in flying large planes, particularly Boeings, the flight instructor said. A car dealer in Wayne, N.J., confirms the FBI has confiscated his records on cars Alhazmi had rented. * Nawaf Alhazmi was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the indictment against Zacarias Moussaoui. * (3) Salem Alhazmi * Possible residences: Fort Lee and Wayne, N.J. * Listed as a passenger in seat 5F. Spent time in Chechnya with Nawaf Alhazmi. Was on a U.S. government watch list, along with his associate Khalid Almihdhar, before the attacks. Newsweek reports the Immigration and Naturalization Service checked its databases and realized he and Al-Midhar entered the United States earlier this year on business visas, giving a Marriott Hotel in New York as their address. The INS also learned the two men had entered the country last year and had listed a Los Angeles hotel chain as their address. * Salem Alhazmi was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the indictment against Zacarias Moussaoui. * THIS MAN IS SAID TO BE ALIVE - WHO WAS ON FLIGHT 77? (telegraph) * (4) Hani Hanjour * Possible residences: Phoenix, Ariz., San Diego, Calif., New York * A Saudi Arabian national who went to live in the United Arab Emirates in 1999. Federal Aviation Administration records show someone named Hani Hanjour received a commercial pilot's license in 1999, listing a P.O. box in Saudi Arabia as his address. * An instructor at CRM Flight School in Scottsdale, Ariz., said Hanjour received training there from September through November of 1996. Hanjour returned again in December of 1997. He was trying for his private pilot's license but, the instructor says, was a very poor student who skipped homework and missed flights. * According to The Associated Press, Hanjour flew three times from a flight school at Freeway Airport in Bowie, Md., in August. He ultimately received an FAA pilot's license. One of five hijackers who worked out at a Gold's Gym in Greenbelt, Md., for a few days in September. * He was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the indictment against Zacarias Moussaoui. * (5) Majed Moqed * Listed as a passenger in seat 12A. * One of five hijackers who worked out at a Gold's Gym in Greenbelt, Md., for a few days earlier this month. The FBI has obtained the phone records from his mobile phone. * He was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the indictment against Zacarias Moussaoui. Informal Brainstorming On Firday, 21 December 2001, it was made public that a tape had been recovered with bin Laden naming hijackers, including the Alhazmi brothers of Flight 77 (but one of them is reported alive?). I Don't know when the tape was discovered or produced, but I do know the US was pissed off enough about something to start dropping 'daisy-cutters' on the 10th of December. This tape might have been further evidence linking the 'captured' terrorists to the operations of bin Laden further justifying an escalation. Then on Christmas, 2 weeks after the 'daisy-cutter' bombardments of the Tora-Bora region, reports of Osama's death start filtering over the net. A couple days later, on the 27th, Al-jazeera network broadcasts the last known legitimate bin Laden video. Exploring Witness Protection KEEPING SECRETS IS AN OPTION OF LIFE AND DEATH Initial websurvey for info * US Code Title 10 Part II Chapter 224 Sec. 3521 - Witness relocation and protection (Cornell Law) * US Marshals Service - Witness Security * HUD witness relocation -WITSEC: Inside the Federal Witness Protection Program by Pete Early, Gerald Shur ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Critical Thinking Bush witnesses first plane impact? HELLO?!?!?!? Whitehouse News Release 020105 Anyway, I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff -- well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane, or -- anyway, I'm sitting there, listening to the briefing, and Andy Card came and said, "America is under attack." * Flight 93 Crash info * Princeton University's Global Consciousness Project looks at data for S-11 * Enterprise Mission's "The End Days Begun?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONSPIRACY CON 2002 TO BE HELD IN SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA: Eight of the world's most controversial speakers will convene in the Bay Area on May 25 and 26, 2002 (Memorial Day weekend) for CONSPIRACY CON 2002. The conference, open to the public, will be held at Santa Clara Marriott Hotel in Santa Clara, California. The speakers are: Col. Bo Gritz, Nick Begich, Norio Hayakawa, Ted L. Gunderson, Anthony J. Hilder, Walter Bowart, Eustace Mullins and Eric Phelps. The topics discussed will be: * WTC- World Trade Center Conspiracy. * The War on Terrorism? * Patriots, Policeman and Paranoia. * The Federal Reserve and IR * Vatican Assassins * H.A.A.R.P. * Mind Kontrol (MK) * The New World Order * and Emerging Technologies for Global Governance. There will also be panel discussions, slides, vides and exhibits. For more formation: http://www.conspiracycon.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kind Words... YOU GUYS ROCK!!! THANK YOU FOR THE ENERGY YOU PUT IN FOR THE TRUTH! In the hope we can kick the chess board over once and for all.. Thanks for the kind words. They are very much appreciated. This Site Recommended By Backwash.com Discussion at Backwash ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Back to Main ------------------------------------------------------------------------ W3 page maintained by The Eschatus <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
