(UN meeting to decide what to do with all you useless eaters and
malcontents. And FAKE-FRAUD-PHONEY so-called Conservative, GW. Bush
will be there, just like his Daddy. Can you say, "Yes,
Massa", boys and girls?)
------------------
Slaves Of The United Nations:
Their Most Dangerous Meeting Ever!
By: Alan Caruba
Published in the March 20, 2002 issue of Ether Zone.
Next week, March 18 through March 21, is going to determine whether
liberty continues to exist in the world or whether everyone will fall
pray to the schemes of the United Nations to become a one-world
government imposing a New World Order.
My friend, Henry Lamb, the chairman of Sovereignty International,
recently wrote about the similarities between Hitler�s mad dreams of
global dominance and the United Nations� careful, slow creep and crawl
toward the same goal. In the end, just as the United States and its
allies put an end to Herr Hitler�s villainy, the US remains the only
power on Earth capable of ending the nightmare of enslavement by the
global government plotters and schemers in the United Nations.
To make the bad news worse, President Bush will be among the more than
fifty world leaders who will attend the event. Will he sign off on this
most dangerous threat to our national sovereignty?
Consider the list of world conferences the United Nations has sponsored
in just the passed decade. Conferences on children (1990); on the
environment (1992); on human rights (1993); on global governance (1993
& 1995); on world trade (1994); on world population (1994); on social
development (1995); on sustainable development (1995); on women (1995);
on human habitats (1996); on global warming (1996); on the International
Criminal court (1998); and its Millennium Assembly and Summit in 2000.
There was an aborted conference on racial prejudice in 2001 that was so
filled with hatred it swiftly sank into the mire of its own
hypocrisy.
Let me borrow a sentence from the Declaration of Independence, by action
of the Second Continental Congress, July 4, 1776: "But when a long
train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object,
evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their
right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new
guards for their future security."
The United States fought the War of Independence over the issue of
"taxation without representation." Who represents you at the
United Nations? A single appointed ambassador! With one vote in the
General Assembly!
Next week, in Monterey, Mexico, the UN High Level Panel of Financing
Development will meet. The United Nations was set up to be financed by
dues from its member states, but the UN has been cautiously working
toward becoming financially independent of its own members by imposing a
series of taxes that would increase its income by trillions.
These taxes would include those on international and other air
transportation, the use of all coal, oil and natural gas, taxes on all
currency transactions, and a dozen others they have lined up such as
taxes on weapons exports, the Internet, and who knows what else?
The UN Conference in Mexico will propose consolidating all international
financial and development institutions under its control. If the UN were
to control which nations receive development funding and which do not, it
will have a total chokehold on the future over every nation. It will even
propose that immigrants will have to pay taxes not only to their new
nation of residence, but the one from which they may well have
fled!
With trillions, the cabal that runs the United Nations would no longer
have to take notice of the United States or any other nation. It would
soon be putting together its own vast military force capable of invading
any nation to impose its will. The UN already has an International Court
that already claims jurisdiction over every nation and its citizens, even
if that nation is not a signatory to the conference that created
it.
What is at stake here is the prospect of raw, unlimited power in the
hands of people who are not elected by anyone other than themselves, if
they can get their hands on the money to achieve this goal!
Who would support such an obscenity? How about former President Clinton�s
Deputy Secretary of State, Strobe Talbot, who said, "Nationhood as
we know it will be obsolete, all states will recognize a single, global
authority, and national sovereignty wasn�t such a great idea after
all."
Multiply Talbot by the unknown, countless people in Congress and
elsewhere throughout our government, along with others ranging from
openly communist or socialist organizations to so-called environmental
organizations, the people who run multinational corporations who see
profit signs if there are no borders or restraints, the mysterious clique
who run some of nation�s wealthiest foundations, and all the others who
see themselves acquiring power and wealth under the aegis of the United
Nations.
No single event occurring in the world during the second week of March
2002 has the importance of this United Nations conference. Unless its
goals are utterly defeated, the rights of the citizens of the United
States of America, as defined and protected by our Constitution, will
disappear and, along with those of every other citizen of the world, we
shall become the slaves of the UN.
-end article-
------------------
-InfoWarz
"We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and
for future generations a new world order, a
world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the
conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a
real chance at this new world order, an
order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to
fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders."
-President George Bush 1991
"Until my dying day, I will regret signing the United Nations
Charter."
- U.S. Senator Patrick McCarran
