-Caveat Lector-
From
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4376958,00.html
}}}>Begin
America's bioterror
Bush has pledged to eliminate weapons of mass destruction. He should start at
home
George Monbiot
Tuesday March 19, 2002
The Guardian
Dear President Bush,
In commemorating the victims of the attacks on New York and Washington last
week, you called for disputes to be "settled within the bounds of reason". You
insisted that "every nation in our coalition must take seriously the growing threat" of
biological and chemical weapons. You assured us that on this issue "there is no
margin for error, and no chance to learn from mistakes... inaction is not an option".
These are sentiments with which most of the world's people would agree. While
many of us believe that attacking Iraq would enhance rather than reduce the
possibility that weapons of mass destruction will be used, few would dispute that
chemical and biological agents present a grave danger to the world.
So those of us in other nations who have followed this issue are puzzled. Why should
you, who claim to want to build "a peaceful world beyond the war on terror" have
done all you can to undermine efforts to control these deadly weapons? Why should
the congressmen in your party have repeatedly sabotaged attempts to ensure that
biological and chemical agents are eliminated?
In December, your negotiators tore the biological weapons convention to shreds. The
1972 convention, as you know, was impossible to implement. While the treaty
banned the development and production of bioweapons, it contained no mechanism
for ensuring that its rules were enforced. So for six years, the 144 signatories had
been developing a "verification protocol", which would permit the United Nations to
examine suspected bioweapons facilities. In July, your government refused to sign
the protocol. In December, you deliberately scuttled the negotiations by insisting, at
the last minute, that the resolution be rewritten. One European delegate, referring to
the commitments your delegation had made before the meeting, observed, "they are
liars. In decades of multilateral negotiations, we've never experienced this kind of
insulting behaviour." Your actions have rendered the convention useless, leaving the
world unprotected from the very weapons you say you want to eliminate.
Four years ago, Republican members of Congress, working alongside the Clinton
government, voted to inflict similar damage to the chemical weapons convention.
This treaty already possessed the means to force nations to open their laboratories
to inspection, which is the key determinant of effective weapons control. But in 1998,
your party decided that the United States should not be subject to these provisions.
By passing legislation banning the removal of chemical samples from the US by
international weapons inspectors; limiting the number of laboratories which the US
needs to declare and permitting the United States president to refuse "challenge
inspections" of its chemical plants, Republican congressmen effectively hobbled the
convention worldwide. Under your presidency, even routine verification has been
vitiated, as government officials have told the inspectors which parts of a site they
can and cannot visit, just as Saddam Hussein has done in Iraq. Other countries have
used your intransigence as an excuse for undermining the convention themselves.
The United States has also withheld both the money required by the chemicals
weapons inspectorate, and the funds needed to remove and disable the vast arsenal
of warheads loaded with nerve agents in western Siberia, some of which are lying in
warehouses secured only by bicycle padlocks on the doors. It was your own senator,
Pat Roberts, who argued that the promised funding should not be issued, on the
grounds that these weapons "pose more of an environmental threat to Russia than a
security threat to the United States". Yet security at the dumps is so lax that no one
even knows how many warheads they contain.
You should not be surprised to learn that many of us have been wondering why your
professed intentions and your policies diverge so widely. Nor should you be surprised
to discover that some of us suspect that the US might have some deadly secrets of
its own, which your government hopes to shield from public view.
In September last year, the New York Times reported that "the Pentagon has built a
germ factory that could make enough lethal microbes to wipe out entire cities". The
factory's purpose was defensive: your employees wanted to see how easy it would
be for terrorists to do the same thing. But it was constructed without either
congressional oversight or a declaration to the biological weapons convention, in
direct contravention of international law. We could, perhaps, agree that if the US had
discovered a similar undisclosed plant in a poor nation, then that country's
government, if it survived your initial response, would have a good deal of explaining
to do.
But of still more concern is the recent discovery that your government has been
planning to test warheads containing live microbes in large aerosol chambers at the
US Army's Edgewood Chemical Biological Centre in Maryland. Experts in this field
say that the scale of the experiments suggests that they are not defensive, but
designed to help develop new biological weapons.
It is also clear that some elements of your existing defence programme contravene
both of the treaties your government and your party have sabotaged. The genetically
engineered fungus you have developed for aerial spraying in Colombia plainly
qualifies as a non-lethal biological weapon. And, because your strategic aims in that
country extend beyond the simple eradication of drugs to the elimination of the
leftwing rebel forces, the chemical sprays you have been using in the regions they
control have also clearly been deployed as weapons, much as Agent Orange was in
Vietnam. Your military laboratories have been developing a new range of genetically
engineered "materials-eating bacteria", designed to destroy runways, engines and
the radar-blocking coatings of warplanes. Though they do not directly affect humans,
you would be hard-put to deny that these are biological weapons.
Your government has also refused to destroy its stocks of smallpox, and has insisted
on developing new and more lethal varieties of anthrax. You say that this is purely for
defensive purposes: to study how they might be used by enemy forces, or to develop
new kinds of vaccine. But the Federation of American Scientists warns that some of
the new research you are funding could be categorised as "dual use": it could lead
just as easily to attack as to defence. Even if we were to accept your government's
assurances that these programmes are solely defensive in nature, it is surely plain
that they are generating the very hazards they claim to be confronting. The anthrax
attacks in October appear to have been launched by a scientist from within your own
biological warfare laboratories, making use of a strain developed by the US Army's
medical research institute.
Mr President, you say you want to save the world from biological and chemical
weapons. With or without the help of our own leaders, you seem prepared to go to
war in pursuit of that aim. But surely the first step towards dealing with weapons of
mass destruction is the mass destruction of weapons? And surely your campaign for
world peace would be more convincing if you respected the conventions designed to
destroy them?
Yours sincerely, George Monbiot
www.monbiot.com
Guardian Unlimited � Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
End<{{{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
