-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.rense.com/general21/bil.htm

}}}>Begin
Rense.com

US Companies Sold Iraq
Billions Of NBC Weapons Materials
By William Blum
The Progressive Magazine
http://www.progressive.org
April 1998 Issue
3-26-2

(Note - This four year old article contains extremely relevant information for 
today...)

The United States almost went to war against Iraq in February because of Saddam
Hussein's weapons program. In his State of the Union address, President Clinton
castigated Hussein for "developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and
the missiles to deliver them."

"You cannot defy the will of the world," the President proclaimed. "You have used
weapons of mass destruction before. We are determined to deny you the capacity to
use them again."

Most Americans listening to the President did not know that the United States
supplied Iraq with much of the raw material for creating a chemical and biological
warfare program. Nor did the media report that U.S. companies sold Iraq more than
$1 billion worth of the components needed to build nuclear weapons and diverse
types of missiles, including the infamous Scud.

When Iraq engaged in chemical and biological warfare in the 1980s, barely a peep of
moral outrage could be heard from Washington, as it kept supplying Saddam with
the materials he needed to build weapons.

>From 1980 to 1988, Iraq and Iran waged a terrible war against each other, a war that
might not have begun if President Jimmy Carter had not given the Iraqis a green light
to attack Iran, in response to repeated provocations. Throughout much of the war,
the United States provided military aid and intelligence information to both sides,
hoping that each would inflict severe damage on the other. Noam Chomsky suggests
that this strategy is a way for America to keep control of its oil supply:

"It's been a leading, driving doctrine of U.S. foreign policy since the 1940s that the
vast and unparalleled energy resources of the Gulf region will be effectively
dominated by the United States and its clients, and, crucially, that no independent
indigenous force will be permitted to have a substantial influence on the
administration of oil production and price."

During the Iran-Iraq war, Iraq received the lion's share of American support because
at the time Iran was regarded as the greater threat to U.S. interests. According to a
1994 Senate report, private American suppliers, licensed by the U.S. Department of
Commerce, exported a witch's brew of biological and chemical materials to Iraq from
1985 through 1989. Among the biological materials, which often produce slow,
agonizing death, were:

* Bacillus Anthracis, cause of anthrax.

* Clostridium Botulinum, a source of botulinum toxin.

* Histoplasma Capsulatam, cause of a disease attacking lungs, brain, spinal cord,
and heart.

* Brucella Melitensis, a bacteria that can damage major organs.

* Clostridium Perfringens, a highly toxic bacteria causing systemic illness.

* Clostridium tetani, a highly toxigenic substance.


Also on the list: Escherichia coli (E. coli), genetic materials, human and bacterial
DNA, and dozens of other pathogenic biological agents. "These biological materials
were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction," the Senate
report stated. "It was later learned that these microorganisms exported by the United
States were identical to those the United Nations inspectors found and removed from
the Iraqi biological warfare program."

The report noted further that U.S. exports to Iraq included the precursors to
chemical-warfare agents, plans for chemical and biological warfare production
facilities, and chemical-warhead filling equipment.

The exports continued to at least November 28, 1989, despite evidence that Iraq was
engaging in chemical and biological warfare against Iranians and Kurds since as
early as 1984.

The American company that provided the most biological materials to Iraq in the
1980s was American Type Culture Collection of Maryland and Virginia, which made
seventy shipments of the anthrax-causing germ and other pathogenic agents,
according to a 1996 Newsday story.

Other American companies also provided Iraq with the chemical or biological
compounds, or the facilities and equipment used to create the compounds for
chemical and biological warfare. Among these suppliers were the following:

* Alcolac International, a Baltimore chemical manufacturer already linked to the
illegal shipment of chemicals to Iran, shipped large quantities of thiodiglycol (used 
to
make mustard gas) as well as other chemical and biological ingredients, according to
a 1989 story in The New York Times.

* Nu Kraft Mercantile Corp. of Brooklyn (affiliated with the United Steel and Strip
Corporation) also supplied Iraq with huge amounts of thiodiglycol, the Times
reported.

* Celery Corp., Charlotte, NC

* Matrix-Churchill Corp., Cleveland, OH (regarded as a front for the Iraqi government,
according to Representative Henry Gonzalez, Democrat of Texas, who quoted U.S.
intelligence documents to this effect in a 1992 speech on the House floor).


The following companies were also named as chemical and biological materials
suppliers in the 1992 Senate hearings on "United States export policy toward Iraq
prior to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait":

* Mouse Master, Lilburn, GA

* Sullaire Corp., Charlotte, NC

* Pure Aire, Charlotte, NC

* Posi Seal, Inc., N. Stonington, CT

* Union Carbide, Danbury, CT

* Evapco, Taneytown, MD

* Gorman-Rupp, Mansfield, OH


Additionally, several other companies were sued in connection with their activities
providing Iraq with chemical or biological supplies: subsidiaries or branches of Fisher
Controls International, Inc., St. Louis; Rhone- Poulenc, Inc., Princeton, NJ; Bechtel
Group, Inc., San Francisco; and Lummus Crest, Inc., Bloomfield, NJ, which built one
chemical plant in Iraq and, before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, was
building an ethylene facility. Ethylene is a necessary ingredient for thiodiglycol

In 1994, a group of twenty-six veterans, suffering from what has come to be known
as Gulf War Syndrome, filed a billion-dollar lawsuit in Houston against Fisher,
Rhone-Poulenc, Bechtel Group, and Lummus Crest, as well as American Type
Culture Collection (ATCC) and six other firms, for helping Iraq to obtain or produce
the compounds which the veterans blamed for their illnesses. By 1998, the number
of plaintiffs has risen to more than 4,000 and the suit is still pending in Texas.

A Pentagon study in 1994 dismissed links between chemical and biological weapons
and Gulf War Syndrome. Newsday later disclosed, however, that the man who
headed the study, Nobel laureate Joshua Lederberg, was a director of ATCC.
Moreover, at the time of ATCC's shipments to Iraq, which the Commerce
Department approved, the firm's CEO was a member of the Commerce
Department's Technical Advisory Committee, the paper found.

A larger number of American firms supplied Iraq with the specialized computers,
lasers, testing and analyzing equipment, and other instruments and hardware vital to
the manufacture of nuclear weapons, missiles, and delivery systems. Computers, in
particular, play a key role in nuclear weapons development. Advanced computers
make it feasible to avoid carrying out nuclear test explosions, thus preserving the
program's secrecy. The 1992 Senate hearings implicated the following firms:

* Kennametal, Latrobe, PA

* Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA

* International Computer Systems, CA, SC, and TX

* Perkins-Elmer, Norwalk, CT

* BDM Corp., McLean, VA

* Leybold Vacuum Systems, Export, PA

* Spectra Physics, Mountain View, CA

* Unisys Corp., Blue Bell, PA

* Finnigan MAT, San Jose, CA

* Scientific Atlanta, Atlanta, GA

* Spectral Data Corp., Champaign, IL

* Tektronix, Wilsonville, OR

* Veeco Instruments, Inc., Plainview, NY

* Wiltron Company, Morgan Hill, CA

The House report also singled out: TI Coating, Inc., Axel Electronics, Data General
Corp., Gerber Systems, Honeywell, Inc., Digital Equipment Corp., Sackman
Associates, Rockwell Collins International, Wild Magnavox Satellite Survey, Zeta
Laboratories, Carl Schenck, EZ Logic Data, International Imaging Systems, Semetex
Corp., and Thermo Jarrell Ash Corporation.

Some of the companies said later that they had no idea Iraq might ever put their
products to military use. A spokesperson for Hewlett Packard said the company
believed that the Iraqi recipient of its shipments, Saad 16, was an institution of 
higher
learning. In fact, in 1990 The Wall Street Journal described Saad 16 as "a heavily
fortified, state-of-the-art complex for aircraft construction, missile design, and, 
almost
certainly, nuclear- weapons research."

Other corporations recognized the military potential of their goods but considered it
the government's job to worry about it. "Every once in a while you kind of wonder
when you sell something to a certain country," said Robert Finney, president of
Electronic Associates, Inc., which supplied Saad 16 with a powerful computer that
could be used for missile testing and development. "But it's not up to us to make
foreign policy," Finney told The Wall Street Journal.

In 1982, the Reagan Administration took Iraq off its list of countries alleged to
sponsor terrorism, making it eligible to receive high-tech items generally denied to
those on the list. Conventional military sales began in December of that year.
Representative Samuel Gejdenson, Democrat of Connecticut, chairman of a House
subcommittee investigating "United States Exports of Sensitive Technology to Iraq,"
stated in 1991:

"From 1985 to 1990, the United States Government approved 771 licenses for the
export to Iraq of $1.5 billion worth of biological agents and high- tech equipment with
military application. [Only thirty-nine applications were rejected.] The United States
spent virtually an entire decade making sure that Saddam Hussein had almost
whatever he wanted. . . . The Administration has never acknowledged that it took this
course of action, nor has it explained why it did so. In reviewing documents and
press accounts, and interviewing knowledgeable sources, it becomes clear that
United States export-control policy was directed by U.S. foreign policy as formulated
by the State Department, and it was U.S. foreign policy to assist the regime of
Saddam Hussein."

Subsequently, Representative John Dingell, Democrat of Michigan, investigated the
Department of Energy concerning an unheeded 1989 warning about Iraq's nuclear
weapons program. In 1992, he accused the DOE of punishing employees who raised
the alarm and rewarding those who didn't take it seriously. One DOE scientist,
interviewed by Dingell's Energy and Commerce Committee, was especially
conscientious about the mission of the nuclear non-proliferation program. For his
efforts, he received very little cooperation, inadequate staff, and was finally forced 
to
quit in frustration. "It was impossible to do a good job," said William Emel. His
immediate manager, who tried to get the proliferation program fully staffed, was
chastened by management and removed from his position. Emel was hounded by
the DOE at his new job as well.

Another Senate committee, investigating "United States export policy toward Iraq
prior to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait," heard testimony in 1992 that Commerce
Department personnel "changed information on sixty-eight licenses; that references
to military end uses were deleted and the designation 'military truck' was changed.
This was done on licenses having a total value of over $1 billion." Testimony made
clear that the White House was "involved" in "a deliberate effort . . . to alter these
documents and mislead the Congress."

American foreign-policy makers maintained a cooperative relationship with U.S.
corporate interests in the region. In 1985, Marshall Wiley, former U.S. ambassador to
Oman, set up the Washington-based U.S.-Iraq Business Forum, which lobbied in
Washington on behalf of Iraq to promote U.S. trade with that country. Speaking of
the Forum's creation, Wiley later explained, "I went to the State Department and told
them what I was planning to do, and they said, 'Fine. It sounds like a good idea.' It
was our policy to increase exports to Iraq."

Though the government readily approved most sales to Iraq, officials at Defense and
Commerce clashed over some of them (with the State Department and the White
House backing Commerce). "If an item was in dispute, my attitude was if they were
readily available from other markets, I didn't see why we should deprive American
markets," explained Richard Murphy in 1990. Murphy was Assistant Secretary of
State for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs from 1983 to 1989.

As it turned out, Iraq did not use any chemical or biological weapons against U.S.
forces in the Gulf War. But American planes bombed chemical and biological
weapons storage facilities with abandon, potentially dooming tens of thousands of
American soldiers to lives of prolonged and permanent agony, and an unknown
number of Iraqis to a similar fate. Among the symptoms reported by the affected
soldiers are memory loss, scarred lungs, chronic fatigue, severe headache, raspy
voice, and passing out. The Pentagon estimates that nearly 100,000 American
soldiers were exposed to sarin gas alone.

After the war, White House and Defense Department officials tried their best to deny
that Gulf War Syndrome had anything to do with the bombings. The suffering of
soldiers was not their overriding concern. The top concerns of the Bush and Clinton
Administrations were to protect perceived U.S. interests in the Middle East, and to
ensure that American corporations still had healthy balance sheets. - William Blum is
the author of "Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II"
(Common Courage Press, 1995).
Email This Article





MainPage
http://www.rense.com
End<{{{ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to