-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent:              Sun, 31 Mar 2002 21:42:17 +0000
From:                   robalini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                Konformist: Cheney Still A Donkey Dick
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com


http://www.latimes.com/

THE NATION

Industry's a Key Player in Energy Data
Politics: Bush team, faced with a deadline, releases documents on
task force. Many passages are edited out, fanning controversy.
By RICHARD SIMON and EDMUND SANDERS and ELIZABETH SHOGREN
TIMES STAFF WRITERS

March 26 2002

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration Monday released thousands of
documents on its energy task force, showing that industry groups
provided substantial input in drafting the president's energy plan.

In putting out 11,000 pages of documents before a midnight deadline,
the Energy Department gave new ammunition to critics of the
administration's energy policy, who say it is tilted in favor of the
coal, gas, oil and nuclear industries.

The documents show that Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham met with
more than 30 industry representatives at eight sessions from Feb. 14
to April 26. The Nuclear Energy Institute, the Independent Petroleum
Assn. of America and the American Coal Co. were among the business
groups invited to those sessions. No representatives of environmental
or consumer groups were listed as meeting with Abraham.

In a statement, Abraham said the documents show that the energy plan
was "balanced" and that the Energy Department "not only sought but
included all viewpoints." Department officials said they sought input
from environmentalists but were often rebuffed. Environmental groups
have said their calls to administration officials weren't returned.

The department said that Abraham had declined a number of requests
from business executives for meetings.

The documents did little to quell a legal and political controversy
over the dealings of the energy task force, established by President
Bush only days after he took office. Bush, a former oilman, named
Vice President Dick Cheney, who had led an energy services company,
to head the task force.

The administration's refusal to provide details of the task force's
meetings led the General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of
Congress, to file its first-ever lawsuit Feb. 22 against the
executive branch. That lawsuit has not been resolved.

Separately, the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental
organization, and Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group,
successfully brought court cases forcing the Energy Department and
other federal agencies that participated in the task force to make
their records available.

Those two organizations had sought documents last spring under the
Freedom of Information Act and sued when it appeared that the
government was dragging its feet on those requests. The two judges in
these lawsuits set Monday as the deadline to begin releasing the
documents.

Energy Dept. Withholds Thousands of Pages

In addition to the Energy Department documents, about 5,000 pages of
documents were released Monday by the Department of Agriculture, the
Environmental Protection Agency and the Office of Management and
Budget.

The Energy Department withheld 15,000 pages of documents. Of the
11,000 provided, many were heavily redacted. The omissions fanned the
controversy over the task force's secret meetings and contacts with
industry groups, many of which were sources of sizable donations to
the Bush-Cheney campaign.

Abel Lopez, director of an Energy Department office that deals with
requests for records, said the deletions were permitted under the
Freedom of Information Act, which "protects advice, recommendations
and opinions" that are part of the executive branch's decision-making
process.

Such redaction is not uncommon. Under the Freedom of Information Act,
government agencies may refuse to release information for a variety
of reasons, including protecting an individual's privacy or shielding
policy debates.

But Judicial Watch officials accused the administration of holding
back key records and vowed to return to court. "They're withholding
information that the public has a right to obtain," said Larry
Klayman, chairman and general counsel of the conservative watchdog
group.

The documents were provided to a variety of environmental groups and
media organizations, including The Times, which had requested the
information under the Freedom of Information Act.

The documents show that the California energy crisis last year was a
much-discussed topic at the Energy Department, with e-mails on the
state's troubles often flagged as high priority. But in most cases,
the content of the e-mails was edited out.

"Virtually all the e-mails we have seen have been completely blanked
out," said John Walke, director of clean air programs for the Natural
Resources Defense Council. "There are huge blank passages associated
with the e-mails. Some of the sentences are cut off in the middle and
redacted out in the bizarre way."

Walke was particularly interested in learning about plans for the new
source review provision of the Clean Air Act, which requires plants
to install state-of-the-art pollution control devices when they
renovate their plants in a way that increases pollution.

But while the phrase "New Source Review" or its abbreviation may
appear in the subject or below an attachment icon, there is no text.

"It gives you nothing," Walke said. "The substance is purposefully
stricken from the document."

Give-and-Take Revealed in E-Mails

Among the documents released were e-mails between energy officials,
detailed schedules for the secretary's chief of staff and other key
officials, e-mails from citizens praising the plan or suggesting
various technologies that would help solve the country's energy woes.

Some of the e-mails from industry lobbyists and representatives to
key members of the administration's energy task force suggested that
there was significant give-and-take in the development of the plan.
For instance, the National Petrochemical and Refiners Assn. and the
Nuclear Energy Institute supplied recommended paragraphs to drop into
specific sections of the plan.

The release also included many documents already public, such as
energy proposals from think tanks, environmental groups and industry
associations; administration officials' testimony to Congress;
letters to the agency from members of Congress; and news reports on
energy troubles from newspapers, wire services and broadcast outlets.

The EPA documents included appeals by the oil industry for reducing
the number of gasoline formulas used across the country and by the
auto industry for reevaluating the government's fuel-economy
standards. The administration's plan called for studying both issues.

Democratic lawmakers contend that the energy industry, including
scandal-plagued Enron Corp., heavily influenced shaping of a
production-tilted energy policy that favors the oil, gas, coal and
nuclear industries. Indeed, the administration has acknowledged that
Enron officials met six times with task force officials, including
once with Cheney himself.

The Republican-controlled House last summer approved an energy plan
that included a number of the administration's initiatives, including
opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas
drilling. The Democratic-controlled Senate has been bogged down in a
debate on a far different energy bill that would stress conservation
over production.

The GAO is continuing to wage its legal battle to secure additional
information, including White House records. Administration officials
have said they may claim executive privilege--a doctrine that
presidents from George Washington onward have used to withhold
information from Congress or the judiciary--to maintain the
confidentiality of Cheney's records.

They also contend that releasing the information would set a bad
precedent for future administrations seeking candid advice from
outside experts.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said Monday that the release of
the documents did not alter the White House's opposition to making
public the details of Cheney's meetings.

"The constitutional principle that the president and the vice
president have enunciated remains in place," Fleischer said, "and the
president will continue to fight for that."

*

Times researcher Robert Patrick contributed to this report.
If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at
latimes.com/archives. For information about reprinting this article,
go to www.lats.com/rights.

*****

Judicial Watch Decries Missing Bush Energy Documents
By Kathy A. Gambrell
UPI White House Reporter
3-27-2

WASHINGTON (UPI) - The conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch
said Tuesday that more than 25,000 documents were missing from the
thousands released by the Bush administration under a Freedom of
Information Act request seeking information on deliberations between
Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force and industry
executives.

Larry Klayman, attorney for Judicial Watch, told reporters during an
news conference the organization would return to court on May 2 and
ask a judge to give them the ability to question Bush administration
officials about what information was missing from the 11,000 pages of
documents it did release and to seek the disclosure of additional
documents from the White House.

Papers released under the court order were from the Department of
Energy, White House Office of Budget and Management, Department of
Agriculture, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Judicial Watch said about 15,000 documents from the Energy Department
were missing and another 10,000 from the EPA were also missing. They
said they have received none of the requested documents from the
Department of Treasury or the Department of Commerce.

White House officials called the May 2 hearing a "follow-up" hearing
and said they were unaware that Judicial Watch planned to seek
additional documents.

Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said the released information would
only further confirm that the energy plan was a balanced plan and
included all viewpoints.

"It assures the American people that it was an open and appropriate
process. Most importantly, the National Energy Policy provides a much-
needed plan for energy security for America," Abraham said.

The agency said it sought advice from energy, environmental and
related organizations and leading experts to incorporate policy
recommendations, but that in some instances, some interested
stakeholders did not come forward with recommendations.

To ensure a wide diversity of views was considered, the department
solicited input and sought the advice from energy, environmental and
related organizations and leading experts to incorporate policy
recommendations. In some instances, DOE reached out and solicited the
views of interested stakeholders that did not come forth with
recommendations, Abraham said.

Democrats have alleged that energy companies such as the now-bankrupt
Enron Corp. unduly influenced the task force while ignoring
environmental groups. Judicial Watch said it appeared that Enron
sought favors from both the Clinton and Bush administrations. It
suspected that the missing documents were related to the nearly
defunct energy trading company.

President George W. Bush had objected to the disclosure of
communications between the White House and outside experts,
considering it an issue involving the separation of powers between
the legislative and executive branches of government. Bush said he
could not get honest feedback on issues if experts believed their
discussions would be made public.

Klayman called the document release important, but said it was only
one half of the story. "The public deserves full accountability from
the vice president and his energy task force, and Judicial Watch will
continue to pursue that accounting through its other litigation under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act."

Klayman said the missing pages made the administration appear
suspicious and that "Until they release all the documents, the
inference is that they have something to hide."

On Feb. 27, a federal judge ordered the Department of Energy to hand
over thousands of documents related to meetings between energy
industry officials and Cheney's task force. District Judge Gladys
Kessler in a memo accompanying her order called the
department "woefully tardy" in complying with the Freedom of
Information Act request by the Natural Resources Defense Council to
examine the documents.

"It's an absolute stonewall. There is nothing in the e-mail [copies]
because they've all been redacted. I haven't seen redaction of this
nature even in the Clinton administration," said Tom Fitton,
president of Judicial Watch, of the papers released Monday.

Among the documents were appointment book entries from Joseph
Kelliher, a member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Between April 2001 and May 2001, his schedule showed meetings with
the National Mining Association, Western Independent Refiners
Association, the Natural Petroleum Council and the National Domestic
Petroleum Council, among others.

"The train has left the station and I think the destination is full
disclosure," said Fitton.

By Tuesday afternoon the NRDC said it had reviewed only half of the
papers and was expected to make a statement on its examination during
a Wednesday press conference.

Cheney's task force met with Enron Corp., which last fall collapsed
and fell into bankruptcy. Kenneth Lay, then chairman of Enron and now
under public scrutiny, was the only executive to have a private
meeting with Cheney, according to material the vice president has
released over the past year.

Klayman said the relationship between Bush and Lay was so close that
the president often referred to Lay as "Kenny boy." At the time Enron
officials were meeting with the Cheney task force, they were lobbying
hard to keep the federal government from placing a cap on energy
prices in California.

Gov. Gray Davis, D-Calif., and several Democratic members of Congress
have accused Enron of manipulating energy prices that contributed to
California's energy crisis last spring.

After one meeting with an Enron official, Cheney announced that he
would oppose caps. Several Democrats accused Cheney of succumbing to
Enron's influence at an April meeting. But the vice president's
office said Cheney and Bush had consistently opposed price caps and
his position last spring was not influenced by Enron.

The vice president refused to issue a detailed list of participants
in oil industry meetings and what policy positions they pushed for in
Bush's energy plan. Cheney denied anything improper took place at
meetings. He has said that he and his aides were seeking policy
suggestions from across the country.

Copyright � 2002 United Press International. All rights reserved.

*****

Bush Tapped Solar Energy Funds to Print Energy Plan
Fri Mar 29, 9:33 AM ET
By Tom Doggett

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - While environmentalists have slammed the White
House national energy plan for not doing enough to promote renewable
energy, the Bush administration found those government research
programs useful in paying the bill for printing copies of the 170-
page plan.

The administration took money from the Energy Department's solar and
renewable energy and energy conservation budgets to pay for the cost
of printing its national energy plan.

Documents released under court order by the Energy Department this
week revealed that $135,615 was spent from the DOE's solar,
renewables and energy conservation budget to produce 10,000 copies of
the White House energy plan released last May.

Another $1,317.39 was spent for producing 16 "briefing boards" used
by administration officials to illustrate and explain the White House
energy plan.

The newly released documents also show that $176.40 was taken from
the energy conservation program to pay for an Alaska trip by Andrew
Lundquist, the White House energy task force's staff director, to
promote the energy plan.

The administration's energy policy called for drilling in Alaska's
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (news - web sites), a proposal
strongly opposed by environmentalists.

At the same time the White House tapped the renewable budget for
funds to print the energy plan, administration was urging Congress to
cut the renewable and energy efficiency research budgets by more than
50 percent.

Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites), who headed the White
House energy task force, criticized environmentalists for relying too
much on renewables and conservation to solve the nation's energy
problems. "Conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is
not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy,"
Cheney said two weeks before the energy plan was released last May.

The administration did try to spread around the cost of producing the
energy plan.

It dipped into the DOE's fossil energy program, which covers
primarily oil research, to pay $100.92 for a hotel room near the
Government Printing Office where the policy publication was being
produced.

The documents did not name the official or if the hotel offered a
government rate.


If you are interested in a free subscription to The
Konformist Newswire, please visit:

http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist

Or, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!"

(Okay, you can use something else, but it's a kool
catch phrase.)

Visit the Klub Konformist at Yahoo!:

http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/klubkonformist




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


------- End of forwarded message -------
------------------------
"In little more than a year we have gone from enjoying peace
and the most prosperous economy in our history, to a nation
plunged into war, recession and fear. This is a nation being
transformed before our very eyes."

http://www.truthout.com

Steve Wingate, Webmaster
ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to