-Caveat Lector-

Bottom line:  "Berkeley's injection into the debate over transgenic crops is
not new. In 1998, the university signed a five-year, $25 million contract with
Novartis, giving the Swiss chemical company first option on much of the genomic
discoveries made in its plant and microbial biology department. Critics,
including Chapela, alleged conflict of interest. "

Fight rages over bioengineered corn study

Copyright � 2002 AP Online

By ANDREW BRIDGES, AP Science Writer

(April 4, 2002 3:44 p.m. EST) - A prestigious scientific journal is shying away
from a study concluding DNA from genetically modified corn contaminated native
maize in Mexico, amid an unusually public and bitter exchange between its
authors and their critics over "bad science" and questions of incompetence.

In late November, the British journal Nature published a study by University of
California, Berkeley scientists claiming genes from laboratory-altered strains
of corn had found their way into indigenous maize in rural Oaxaca.

The finding further clouded the contentious debate over genetically modified
crops and raised new fears among activists of threats to the diversity of corn
in the very region where the plant was first domesticated millennia ago.

Mexico banned the planting of transgenic corn in 1998 to protect the genetic
integrity of its indigenous maize.

In a terse statement published Thursday on the journal's Web site, editor
Philip Campbell said Nature "has concluded that the evidence available is not
sufficient to justify the publication of the original paper."

Rather than retract the study, Nature printed two criticisms of the work, as
well as a rebuttal from the authors. Their reply includes new data resulting
from further scientific work. The journal's editors, in an unusual move,
requested the Berkeley scientists undertake the work to bolster their
contention - or face a demand for a retraction.

The journal stopped short of declaring the research flawed. Instead, Campbell
wrote that Nature would allow its readers "to judge the science for
themselves." Jo Webber, a London-based spokeswoman for Nature, said the journal
had no further comment.

The move enraged the study's authors, who concede only minor interpretive
errors.

"We certainly stand by our original, main statement and I have yet to see
anyone challenge it legitimately," said Ignacio Chapela, co-author of the study
with David Quist.

Nature took the unusual move after Chapela and Quist's study was severely
criticized by at least four groups of scientists, many with ties to Berkeley.

"The Quist and Chapela study is a testament to technical incompetence," said
Matthew Metz, of the University of Washington and a co-author of one of the two
criticisms. "Evidence for the presence of transgenic DNA in Mexican maize
remains dubious and empirical."

Primarily, the study's critics suggest the researchers misidentified sequences
in the maize genome they believed indicated the presence of transgenic
material. Particularly egregious, critics said, was their claim that the
transgenic material, once it entered the maize's genome, scattered randomly, an
entirely unexpected effect unseen in normal DNA.

"Since Quist and Chapela published bad science in Nature, both scientists and
Nature must come absolutely clean, retract and apologize. There is no other
issue," said geneticist Michael Freeling, also of Berkeley and a co-author of a
critical letter published by Nature.

Nature arranged for three additional scientists, all unidentified, to review
the criticisms and the researchers' reply.

All three pointed out that technical errors marred the research, according to
copies of their comments obtained by The Associated Press.

However, only one called for a retraction unless further evidence for the claim
could be provided - advice apparently followed by Nature. The
others note transgenic corn is likely growing in Mexico, but that scientific
proof is still lacking.

Jane Rissler, a biotechnology critic with advocacy group Union of Concerned
Scientists, said the study's shortcomings should have been detected prior to
publication.

"It is important to note that we need to have the best science that we can get
and that our understanding and proper dealing with genetically engineered crops
is enhanced by that good science," Rissler said.

Berkeley's injection into the debate over transgenic crops is not new. In 1998,
the university signed a five-year, $25 million contract with Novartis, giving
the Swiss chemical company first option on much of the genomic discoveries made
in its plant and microbial biology department. Critics, including Chapela,
alleged conflict of interest.

------------------------
"In little more than a year we have gone from enjoying peace
and the most prosperous economy in our history, to a nation
plunged into war, recession and fear. This is a nation being
transformed before our very eyes."

http://www.truthout.com

Steve Wingate, Webmaster
ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to