-Caveat Lector-
From
http://www.mirror.co.uk/printable_version.cfm?objectid=11761575&siteid=50143
}}}>Begin
NOT IN OUR NAME
Apr 5 2002
John Pilger
AS THE crisis in Israeli-occupied Palestine deepens, Tony Blair will meet George W
Bush today to plan an attack on another country, Iraq.
Their decision may condemn to death more than 10,000 civilians. That is the
"medium case scenario" drawn up by the Pentagon. If the Americans implement their
current strategy of "total war" and target Iraq's electricity and water, the
consequences will be even more horrific.
There is no mandate in any United Nations resolution for this invasion. It will be as
lawless as Nazi Germany's invasion of Poland, which triggered the Second World
War. Indeed, it may well trigger a Third World War, drawing in nations of the region
and beyond.
As Blair arrives at Bush's Texas ranch the question begs: Why does he condemn
Iraq, but is silent on Israel's current bloody and illegal rampage through Palestine?
Why has he not demanded that the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon comply with
UN Security Council resolutions, to which Britain is a signatory, and withdraw from
the Occupied Territories? Why has Blair said nothing as Sharon has sent tanks and
gunships and snipers against civilians - a government targeting innocent people, like
the deaf old lady shot by an Israeli sniper as she tried to get to hospital? Why has
Blair not called at least for military sanctions against Israel, which has 200 nuclear
weapons targeted at Arab capitals?
Blair's culpable silence is imposed by the most dangerous American administration
for a generation. The Bush administration is determined to attack Iraq and take over
a country that is the world's second largest source of oil. The aim is to get rid of
America's and Britain's old friend, Saddam Hussein, whom they no longer control,
and to install another compliant thug in Baghdad.
THAT is why Bush now tells Israel to withdraw from the Palestinian cities it recently
occupied while continuing to replenish the Israeli war machine. The Americans want
a rampant Israel guarding their flank as they attack Iraq and expand their control
across the Middle East, whose oil is now more critical than ever to US military and
economic dominance.
For almost two months, Downing Street, through the discredited system of
unattributable briefings that are secret to the public, have spun two deceptions. The
first is that the Prime Minister will play a vital role at today's meeting with Bush
on his
Texas ranch in "counselling caution." The second is that Blair has a "dossier of
detailed evidence" that "proves" that Saddam Hussein has "a nuclear capability" and
is "investigating a way to launch unsophisticated nuclear bombs" and is also building
chemical and biological weapons.
The fiction of Blair as a steadying hand on his Texas buddy is to be read in Blair's
unrelenting bellicose statements, and his attempts, against the wishes of his senior
military advisers, to send thousands of British troops into the quagmire of
Afghanistan, where his "cautionary influence" on Bush saw as many as 5,000
civilians bombed to death while the Taliban and al-Qaeda leaders got away.
While remaining silent on Israel, Blair is alone in Europe in his promotion of an
attack
on Iraq, a nation of 22 million people with whom the British have no quarrel.
Mysteriously, the "dossier of proof" of the dangers posed by the Iraqi regime has now
been "shelved." This is because no such proof exists and because, suddenly, more
than 130 Labour Members of Parliament are in revolt, including Cabinet and former
Cabinet members. It must be dawning on many of them that so much of this
government's "spin" during the "war on terrorism" has been a farrago of lies and half-
truths provided by an American intelligence apparatus seeking to cover its failure to
provide warning of the attacks of September 11.
Lie Number One is the justification for an attack on Iraq - the threat of its "weapons
of mass destruction." Few countries have had 93 per cent of their major weapons
capability destroyed. This was reported by Rolf Ekeus, the chairman of the United
Nations body authorised to inspect and destroy Iraq's arsenal following the Gulf War
in 1991. UN inspectors certified that 817 out of the 819 Iraqi long-range missiles
were destroyed. In 1999, a special panel of the Security Council recorded that Iraq's
main biological weapons facilities (supplied originally by the US and Britain) "have
been destroyed and rendered harmless."
As for Saddam Hussein's "nuclear threat," the International Atomic Energy Agency
reported that Iraq's nuclear weapons programme had been eliminated "efficiently and
effectively". The IAEA inspectors still travel to Iraq and in January reported full
Iraqi
compliance. Blair and Bush never mention this when they demand that "the weapons
inspectors are allowed back". Nor do they remind us that the UN inspectors were
never expelled by the Iraqis, but withdrawn only after it was revealed they had been
infiltrated by US intelligence.
Lie Number Two is the connection between Iraq and the perpetrators of September
11. There was the rumour that Mohammed Atta, one of the September 11 hijackers,
had met an Iraqi intelligence official in the Czech Republic last year. The Czech
police say he was not even in the country last year. On February 5, a New York
Times investigation concluded: "The Central Intelligence Agency has no evidence
that Iraq has engaged in terrorist operations against the United States in nearly a
decade, and the agency is convinced that Saddam Hussein has not provided
chemical or biological weapons to al-Qaeda or related terrorist groups."
Lie Number Three is that Saddam Hussein, not the US and Britain, "is blocking
humanitarian supplies from reaching the people of Iraq." (Foreign Office minister
Peter Hain). The opposite is true. The United States, with British compliance, is
currently blocking a record $5billion worth of humanitarian supplies from the people
of Iraq. These are shipments already approved by the UN Office of Iraq, which is
authorised by the Security Council. They include life-saving drugs, painkillers,
vaccines, cancer diagnostic equipment.
This wanton denial is rarely reported in Britain. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis,
mostly children, have died as a consequence of an American and British riven
embargo on Iraq that resembles a medieval siege. The embargo allows Iraq less
than £100 with which to feed and care for one person for a whole year. This a major
factor, says the United Nations' Children's Fund, in the death of more than 600,000
infants.
I have seen the appalling state of the children of Iraq. I have sat next to an Iraqi
doctor in a modern hospital while she has turned away parents with children suffering
from cancers that are part of what they call a "Hiroshima epidemic" - caused,
according to several studies, by the depleted uranium that was used by the US and
Britain in the Gulf War and is now carried in the dust of the desert. Not only is Iraq
denied equipment to clean up its contaminated battlefields, but also cancer drugs
and hospital equipment.
I showed a list of barred drugs given to me by Iraqi doctors to Professor Karol Sikora,
who as chief of the cancer programme of the World Health Organisation, wrote in the
British Medical Journal: "Requested radiotherapy equipment, chemotherapy drugs
and analgesics are consistently blocked by United States and British advisers (to the
UN Sanctions Committee). There seems to be a rather ludicrous notion that such
agents could be converted into chemical and other weapons." He told me: "Nearly all
these drugs are available in every British hospital. It seems crazy they couldn't have
morphine. When I was in Iraq, in one hospital they had a little bottle of aspirin
pills to
go around 200 patients in pain." No one doubts that if the murderous Saddam
Hussein saw advantage in deliberately denying his people humanitarian supplies, he
would do so; but the UN, from the Secretary General himself, has said that, while the
regime could do more, it has not withheld supplies.
Denis Halliday, the assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, resigned in
protest at the embargo which he described as "genocidal". Halliday was responsible
for the UN's humanitarian programme in Iraq. His successor, Hans Von Sponeck,
also resigned in disgust. Last November, they wrote: "The death of 5-6,000 children
a month is mostly due to contaminated water, lack of medicines and malnutrition.
The US and UK governments' delayed clearance of equipment and materials is
responsible for this tragedy, not Baghdad."
Those who speak these facts are abused by Blair ministers as apologists for
Saddam Hussein - so embroiled is the government with the Bush administration's
exploitation of America's own tragedy on September 11. This has prevented public
discussion of the crime of an embargo that has hurt only the most vulnerable Iraqis
and which is to be compounded by the crime of attacking the stricken nation.
Unknown to most of the British public, RAF and American aircraft have been
bombing Iraq, week after week, for more than two years. The cost to the British
taxpayer is £800million a year. The Wall Street Journal reported that the US and
Britain faced a "dilemma" because "few targets remain". "We're down to the last
outhouse," said a Pentagon official.
IN any attack on Iraq, Saddam Hussein's escape route is virtually assured - just as
Osama bin Laden's was. The US and Britain have no wish to free the Iraqi people
from a tyranny the CIA once described as its "greatest triumph". The last thing they
want is a separate Kurdish state and another allied to the Shi'ite majority in
neighbouring Iran. They want another Saddam Hussein: one who will do as he is
told.
On March 13, the Foreign Office entertained Brigadier-General Najib Salihi, a former
commander of Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard and chief of the dreaded
military intelligence who took part in the invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Now funded by
the CIA, the general "denies any war crimes". Not that he would ever face arrest in
the West. At the Foreign Office, he is known as a "rapidly rising star". He is their
man, and Washington's man.
The British soldiers who take part in an invasion have every right to know the dirty
secrets that will underpin their action, and extend the suffering of a people held
hostage to a dictatorship and to international power games over which they have no
control. Two weeks ago, the Americans made clear they were prepared to use "low
yield" nuclear weapons, a threat echoed here by Defence Secretary Geoffrey Hoon.
When will Europe stand up? If the leaders of the European Union fall silent, too, in
the face of such danger, what is Europe for? In this country, there is an honourable
rallying cry: Not In Our Name. Bush and Blair must be restrained from killing large
numbers of innocents in our name - a view, according to the polls, shared by a
majority of the British people. An arms and military equipment embargo must be
enforced throughout the region, from Saddam Hussein's Iraq to Ariel Sharon's Israel.
Above all, the siege of both the Iraqi and Palestinian peoples must end now.
Top
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
