As for her "revelation" that the government had prior knowledge of plans for the 9-11 attacks, that's common knowledge best falling under the rubric of "no kidding."
Here you suggest a cover-up.
No, "here" I note the FACT that such knowledge was PLAINLY extant AND evident both prior to and after the 9-11 attacks. There is and was NO "cover up." The information is there for anyone who chooses to read it or otherwise pay attention to the actions of the U.S. government within the context of world events.
<<Such knowledge has "filtered its way" to anyone on the planet who's been paying attention to national and world events over the last twenty five years. Yes, that would include those living in Georgia. :-)>>
Here you admit that even the hayseeds know of it...
No, "here" I "admit" that everyone on the planet knows about it--everyone except, maybe, those who see conspiring boogie men under every rock :-)
<<An investigation of such nature and magnitude usually requires enough evidence to warrant the expenditure. She has NO evidence.>>
And here you mock the idea.
She has offered NO evidence to justify her accusation that George Bush or his administration--specifically--knew about terrorist plans to attack America before
9-11. That does not mean the evidence is not there, it means that she is unaware of it. She, like other plot-sniffing fruit pies, is crazy.
Have you taken your lithium today?
Bill.
Have you sniffed my butt-crack today? :-)
Edward ><+>
If you have fifty problems and one of them is government, you have only one problem.
http://www.global-connector.com/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reality_pump/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
