-Caveat Lector-
>From http://antiwar.com/hacohen/pf/p-h041202.html
}}}>Begin
Letter From Israel
by Ran HaCohen
Antiwar.com
April 12, 2002
Israel � A Suicide Bomber?
Palestinian suicide attacks have been singled out, overemphasised and isolated from
their context in Israel's 35-year occupation of the Palestinian territories, the proper
infrastructure of Palestinian terrorism.
Professional demonisers like Thomas Friedman work hard to persuade us of suicidal
lies like the one claiming suicide bombers are "a whole new form of warfare" unique
to Palestinians. I truly doubt whether the term "Kamikaze" is of Palestinian origin.
There were no Palestinian suicide bombers around back in 1991, when Rajib Ghandi
was assassinated by a suicide bomber; in fact, the person accused of launching
more suicide attacks than anyone else is not Yassir Arafat (his direct involvement in
such attacks may be an outright Israeli fabrication) but Velupillai Prabhakaran, who
heads the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.
The Talmud reminds us that people often accuse others of their own faults. Is this
the case with Israel as well? Can Israel be seen as a suicide bomber? Well, the latter
part of the term obviously holds true: reports of Israeli bulldozers digging mass
graves in Jenin have not been confirmed yet, but the enormous scale of Israeli
bombing in occupied territories hardly needs this evidence. During the British
Mandate in Palestine (1917-1948), the Royal Army considered bombing Jenin from
the air, but dropped the idea for humanitarian reasons; the Israeli army has now used
F-16 jets, helicopters and airborne missiles against this city, while destroying dozens
of houses as well as the entire water, sewage and electricity infrastructure by tanks
and bulldozers.
But has Israel itself suicidal elements? We'll have to take a short survey of
Palestinian suicide bombing to get to that.
Suicide Bombers Analysed
Demonisation successfully coats the suicide bombers with a satanic aura of ultimate
evil, disabling any rational discussion of the subject. Suicide bombers are
represented as a doomsday weapon, as a threat to world security, to civilisation itself
(see, again, Thomas Friedman's column). It's high time to lift this aura.
In my previous column I argued that suicide itself is not considered a crime by most
people. The major ideology of modern times, Nationalism, often praises sacrificing
one's life for one's nation. Israel loves to praise itself for everything positive in
Palestinian society ("we brought them prosperity" etc.) and to blame some "Arab
spirit" for everything negative. But Palestinians' suicidal tendencies maybe have their
roots not only in Islamic fundamentalism but also in Zionism. Israeli school children
are raised on the myth of the Zionist officer Joseph Trumpeldor, whose last words
were: "It is good to die for our country". Similarly, the first association Israeli
soldiers
had in mind for the Palestinians fighting to death in Jenin was the Zionist Masada
myth, where besieged ancient Jews swore to die rather than surrender to the
Romans.
Suicide bombers, as I argued before, are not different from any other weapon. They
can be used against three kinds of targets: soldiers, settlers, and civilians inside
Israel. Let's consider each of these cases.
Bombing Occupation Soldiers is LAWFUL
When acting against soldiers, the suicide bomber has international law on his side.
Yes: international legislation acknowledges the right of occupied people to use force
against their oppressors, both inside the occupied territories and outside them.
Based upon the principles of the Hague International Convention of 1907 and
confirmed in the Nuremberg Tribunal after World War II, this determination was
essential to forestall Nazi claims that partisans, Ghetto fighters, and other
underground resistance forces in the territories occupied by Germany had allegedly
been "terrorists". In the Nuremberg Tribunal it was unequivocally set down that
resistance fighters, including those who had struggled within Germany itself, acted in
accordance with the regulations of international law.
A fact actually unheard of in the media.
Bombing Settlers in the Occupied Territories
Bombing civilians, however, is a crime. If Palestinians do it inside the occupied
territories, the great question is what those civilians, also known as settlers, are
doing there. Their presence in the occupied territories may not justify killing them,
but
it raises serious doubts as for who is responsible for it. Is it the Palestinians
legitimately fighting occupation � or is it rather Israel, that moves civilians into
occupied territory contrary to international law, exposing them to Palestinian attacks?
Israel now claims to be deporting Palestinian civilians from battle zones in order to
protect them. Why does it let its own civilians live in these territories, which are
one
big battlefield?
In fact, extremist settlers like those in Hebron � 500 settlers among 120.000
Palestinians in the heart of the city � often refuse to be protected. When the army
offers to install bullet-proof glass in their windows, they reject it, claiming the
army
should ensure their houses are not shot at instead of stopping the bullets at their
windows. Is this not suicidal?
Bombing Civilians Inside Israel
Okay, this of course is totally illegal and immoral. But have you ever wondered how
suicide bombers get into Israel? Not in a satanic rain like the frogs in Magnolia. In
fact, they walk into Israel.
Walk??? � Yes. They cross the imaginary Green Line between Israel and the
occupied West Bank simply on foot, and then they take a lift, or a bus, or a taxi, to
wherever they want to explode.
This may sound incredible, but it is true. There is no visible border between Israel
and the West Bank.
Now the problem of intruders has been bothering humanity for quite a few millennia,
from China to Berlin; the usual solution is expressed by the English term "fence". If
Israel had wanted to stop suicide bombers, all it had to do is put a fence. This is
Israel's weak spot the Palestinians have found. It's a very revealing weak spot.
Why does Israel not put up a fence? The construction itself is not a problem. There
are quite sophisticated hi-tech fences nowadays. The Gaza Strip is surrounded by
one, reducing intrusions to a zero level. A few weeks after the Israeli withdrawal from
South Lebanon, a fence along the border was completed there too. So why not in the
West Bank?
There are three reasons why Israel does not put a fence along the Green Line:
(A) First and foremost, as even Israeli politicians admit, it's "a political problem".
A
fence might be interpreted as a border. Israel is unwilling to give up the West Bank.
Therefore, it rather lets its citizens die in suicide attacks. It's as simple as that.
(B) More specifically, the numerous Israeli settlements spread throughout the entire
West Bank are a problem for such a fence. If the settlements are taken in, you have
to take the surrounding Palestinian population too, and then what's the point. If you
leave the settlements out, you solve only part of the problem.
The smaller part of the problem, actually. Israel cares much more about its 200.000
settlers in the West Bank than about its 6 million citizens inside the Green Line
(indeed, most settlements are surrounded by a fence). Take this financial evidence:
in the 1990s, the Israeli Government spent on every settler an average of 5,428 NIS
a year. The national average per citizen was just 3,807 NIS. Israeli Arab citizens
were worth much less: 2,402 NIS. The cheaper the citizen, the cheaper his life.
(C) One cannot ignore the propaganda profits. Israel uses terror attack on its
citizens, especially on civilians inside the Green Line, to justify its ever more
violent
occupation and to endlessly expand its illegal settlements. Why build a simple fence,
if you can occasionally sacrifice a few civilians in return for a huge propaganda
benefit for the occupation and the settlements?
Looking in the Mirror
So Thomas Friedman is right to argue that by using suicide bombers the Palestinians
have found Israel's weak spot. This weak spot is the policy of occupation and
settlements. Had Israel agreed to end occupation and dismantle the settlements, as
international decisions demand, it could simply put a fence along the Green Line and
stop suicide bombers. But a fence would harm Israel's settlements policy, and this is
why Israel does not build one. This behaviour, on a national level, is suicidal: the
State of Israel knowingly sacrifices its own civilians for the Molech called
settlements.
The Palestinian suicide bombers are thus but a mirror image of the Israeli policy, a
policy which is both "suicidal" (sacrificing one's own civilians) and murderously
bombing.
Please Support Antiwar.com
A contribution of $50 or more will get you a copy of Ronald Radosh's out-of-print
classic study of the Old Right conservatives, Prophets on the Right: Profiles of
Conservative Critics of American Globalism. Send contributions to
Antiwar.com
520 S. Murphy Avenue, #202
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
