-Caveat Lector-

>From http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig2/fallavollita3.html

}}}>Begin
Bill Bennett and AVOT: Intergenerational Thieves

by Paul Fallavollita

By now, most of us on the Old Right are painfully aware of the project spearheaded
by Bill Bennett, the organization called Americans for Victory over Terrorism (AVOT).
According to Jim Lobe�s AlterNet piece, "War on Dissent Widens," one of the goals
of AVOT is to propagandize college campuses in order to prevent a public backlash
against the War on Terror similar to the one that doomed the Vietnam War.
Bennett�s choice of the Vietnam War as his point of departure reveals much about
his statist commitments, and exposes him as an intellectual accessory to the crime
that the War on Terror constitutes against America�s youth.

Bill Bennett�s statist roots stretch back to the 1960s, when he spent his time rooting
for Martin Luther King, Jr. to encourage the government to abrogate the freedom of
association. My parents spent those years going to school, working for a living, and
then supporting Governor George Wallace�s presidential campaigns. They hoped to
defend the America they grew up in, and countervail both Bennett�s efforts as well as
those of the counter-cultural Left.

Bennett, as a statist cheerleader of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement, harmed my
generation before it was born. As a fervent war propagandist, Bennett again
threatens to harm my "Twentysomething" generation, some forty years later.
Bennett�s warmongering activities constitute a theft of terrible and enraging
magnitude, for it violates the pact between the dead, the living, and the yet unborn
that was spoken of by Edmund Burke. It is sad and ironic that someone young like
me has to remind Bennett about the implications of true conservatism.

The short familial political history I provide above is meant to set the proper context
in evaluating Bennett�s Vietnam comparisons, which are straw men. Bennett is wrong
to portray the anti-war position as Leftist or otherwise unpatriotic. The true 
opposition
to the War on Terror does not come from the minuscule yet loudmouthed counter-
cultural Left, which can always be expected to shill for the latest cause-of-the-month
at a moment�s notice. The true opposition arises from those on the unreconstructed
Right that Bennett and his neocon allies have forsaken, those who still love the more
permanent things, the "little platoons" that make life worth living.

AVOT proselytizes for a War on Terror that runs the risk of becoming perpetual and
much more destructive. It is following a course that will needlessly sacrifice
America�s flower, Midwestern farm boys, across the world, from far-flung Philippine
jungles to the burning sands of the Middle East. My parents saw their friends return
home in body bags from Vietnam. I do not want to see my friends (who are part of
the "little platoons" that make life worth living) meet that same fate in the War on
Terror, which is merely another war that is neither necessary nor justified.

Bennett�s "Remember 9/11" crowd fails to grasp that 9/11 stems from an immigration
problem, not a military problem. The events of 9/11 are ultimately traceable to the
resentment caused by America�s interventionist foreign policy abroad. The very fact
that 9/11 occurred is a striking testament to the congenital incompetence and
malignancy of government. Government is forever cursed with the Midas touch in
reverse. As my parents saw from its behavior in Vietnam, government always brings
pain and betrayal. It never delivers on its promise of a quality product or outcome. It
never restrains itself within limited, rational objectives. The War on Terror is a 
classic
example of these inherent failures of the State. We still have not captured Osama bin
Laden or Mohammed Omar, and the war has expanded across the world with no end
in sight.

The War on Terror reveals a slight difference between liberals and neocons in their
orientation toward government: liberals want to spend other people�s money on
projects intended to benefit special interests, while neocons prefer to sacrifice other
people�s lives in service of their pet crusades. Life and private property are
inextricable, so the varying tactics of the liberals and the neocons are equally
dangerous and immoral.

Another slight difference between the liberals and the neocons lies in their choice of
which special interest they favor. Lobe�s article traces a major source of AVOT�s
funding to Lawrence Kadish, showing that the special interest that the neocons
slavishly promote is the State of Israel. Israel is to the United States what Cuba was
to the former Soviet Union: an entity that remains solvent only through massive
transfer payments from the host nation. The liberals, in contrast to the neocons, have
always tended to be fans of the Soviet Union privately, and of Cuba more openly.
This analogy becomes stretched, however, when one considers what the United
States gets in return from Israel. At least the Cubans sent the Soviets oranges and
sugar cane. All the United States receives from its relationship with Israel are
Mossad agents and Arab hatred and terror. In the likely event that the United States
one day collapses in the same manner (and from many of the same causes) as the
Soviet Union, at least some measure of justice will come when Israel withers on the
vine just as Cuba has in the absence of Soviet backing.

While we await that ultimate collapse to arrive, it is useful to "hasten the day" by
chipping away at the intellectual foundations of the liberals and neocons. The Old
Right must counteract the efforts of AVOT by proclaiming the truth that there has
never been a worthy war in the twenty-first or twentieth centuries. All wars during 
that
span were unwise and unnecessary, including the two wars most sacralized by the
Establishment: the Second World War and the Cold War. The War on Terror � the
Cold War substitute implicitly touted by men like Bennett as the "Vietnam done right"
� must be exposed as just another act of state-sponsored intergenerational fraud
and theft.

April 22, 2002

Paul Fallavollita [send him mail] holds an M.A. in political science from Purdue
University. He has written for LewRockwell.com, EtherZone, Enter Stage Right,
OpinioNet, Spintech, and The American Partisan.

Copyright � 2002 LewRockwell.com
End<{{{

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to