--- Begin Message ---
<PRE>THE HOFFMAN WIRE
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History
Michael A. Hoffman II, Editor
<A HREF=" http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html
">http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html</A>
*******************************************</PRE>
<PRE>============================================================
Sponsor a child today through Children International. Give
a desperately poor child hope for a brighter future. For
only $15 a month you can make a difference!
<A HREF=" http://click.topica.com/caaajW9a2iTuca30J7Qa/ChildrenInternational
">http://click.topica.com/caaajW9a2iTuca30J7Qa/ChildrenInternational</A>
============================================================</PRE>
May 15, 2002
Hoffman Contra Sobran:
Deconstructing the Loyal Opposition
> Lowering Our Guard
> by Joe Sobran
>
> Who would want to provoke a war?
>
> For some reason, even Israel's warmest supporters
> haven't picked up President Bush's description of Prime
> Minister Ariel Sharon as "a man of peace." Unlike "axis
> of evil," the phrase just isn't catching on. It's a bit
> like praising Arnold Schwartzenegger as "this
> generation's Cary Grant." You can admire Arnold for many
> things -- and don't we all adore him? -- but suave charm
> isn't exactly his line.
===============
Hoffman replies: Bush's characterization of Sharon as a man of peace is
not only ludicrous, it's an indicator of the grave degree of disorder in
Bush's soul, the same Bush who the American establishment media refuse
to report was a business partner of the Bin Ladens.
=========
Sobran writes:
> Sharon is tough. Give him that. And he refuses to
> allow his country to be swallowed up by "the
> international community," the United Nations, and
> assorted acronymic agencies. Even when he's wrong, which
> is usually, he sticks to his guns. Sharon consistently
> puts his country first -- though this doesn't really
> distinguish him from most American politicians, who also,
> just as consistently, put his country first.
==============
Hoffman replies:
Oh, God! Here's one of these excruciatingly nonseniscal Sobranisms that
have been cropping up in his columns over the past few years. Is this a
bit of "diplomacy" to try and win over the Sharon-worshipping
conservatives by faintly praising Sharon? If so, it's a fool's errand.
"Give him that"? No way. I give Sharon nothing. He's a baby killer. He's
the personification of the wicked Talmud, of genocidal Zionism's Master
Race doctrines.
Sharon defied the international community and the UN, says Mr. Sobran.
But Sharon's Jewish lobby intimidates, subverts, bribes and thereby
shapes and controls these communities and world bodies. If not, where
were the UN sanctions on "Israel" when it refused the UN war crimes
commission entrance to Jenin?
Sobran lauds Sharon because he says Sharon "sticks to his guns even when
he's wrong...Sharon is tough." This is a virtue? Is the pun about guns
intended? The guns that kill helpless Palestinian grandmothers? The guns
that Sharon's boys used to kill the first victim of the latest Israeli
holocaust that began March 29-- an American citizen, a mother who was
holding her infant when she was shot for no reason other than the
Talmudic alibi that she was a sub-human Palestinian? Sharon sticks to
his guns. Even when wrong. What is Joe saying?
Mr. Sobran opines that Sharon "consistently puts his country first."
Rubbish. Sharon and those like him will destroy the Jewish people. They
put their country last. The Talmud and Zionism are what comes
first--recipes for planetary suicide, of Israeli and Arab first, and
then of everyone.
Why this need to find something to praise in the hideous and disgusting
mass murderer Sharon, who ought to be sitting in death row at the Hague
awaiting a hangman's noose?
============
Sobran writes:
> U.S. Government officials have received information,
> unspecified and admittedly unreliable, that we could have
> an exciting July 4 ahead of us this year. Terrorists may
> have picked Independence Day as the date for an attack on
> a nuclear power plant.
=============
Hoffman replies:
These cry-wolf "reports" are government-generated. They have been issued
to spread panic and fear a half dozen times since Sept. 11. Sobran helps
them by repeating without comment the latest govenrment panic bulletin,
intended to keep the American Group Mind on boil, to keep us away from a
cool, calculating assessment and investigation of the government's own
role in 9/11. Until we truly calm down, "exciting" flag-waving jingoism
obstructs sleuthing and skepticism.
===========
Sobran writes:
> We are also getting news reports and rumors, hard to
> pin down, that Israelis, in this country illegally, have
> been arrested while engaged in curious activities: posing
> as art students, driving a truck with traces of TNT and
> another explosive. It's possible that these Israelis are
> here for innocent reasons, or that their doings aren't
> aimed against the United States: even if they are Mossad
> agents, they may be friendly to this country.
=============
Hoffman replies:
Sobran states that even if they are Mossad agents they may be friendly
to the US anyway.
Huh? This is "Chronicles" magazine "logic." For years Rabbi Jacob
Neusner was a columnist for the celebrated, "hardcore"
paleo-conservative, "Chronicles" magazine-- you know, the 'zine that
purported to want to restore "Western Civilization" by putting a rabbi
on board their ship of state. What a joke.
The Mossad, as a terror and assassination arm of the Israeli government,
is dedicated to the destruction of our civilization. They can no more be
friendly, under any circumstances, to the American people than the
Jewish ("Russian") Mafia or the Chinese Communist Party.
==========
Sobran writes:
> But there is a darker possibility. Some of them may
> be provocateurs whose mission is to stage an event that
> will recharge American hysteria over terrorism and fuel
> demands for immediate war with alleged "terrorist states"
> -- which happen to be Israel's enemies in the Middle
> East. It would be far from the first time Israel had
> duped the United States in pursuit of its own interests.
>
> No politician will say this publicly, but when it
> comes to Israel, U.S. security is very lax. Security
> officials dread the ever-ready charge of anti-Semitism.
> And when Israeli planes attacked the USS Liberty In
> 1967, killing 34 American sailors, or when the spy
> Jonathan Pollard's "rogue operation" turned out to have
> the full authorization of the Israeli government,
> Congress, instead of investigating the incidents fully,
> chose to turn a blind eye. It either didn't want to know
> what happened or didn't want the American public to find
> out. The real scandal is not that we can't trust the
> Israelis; by now that should be a given. What is much
> worse is that we can't trust our own government.
=============
Hoffman replies:
The preceding is factual, an axiom, yet it appears surrounded by the
myopia and muddled thinking previously cited, so its usefulness is
diminished, if not negated by dint of the confusion which mixing a bit
of truth with massive error sows.
===============
Sobran writes:
> In Federalist No. 22, Alexander Hamilton warned that
> one of the weaknesses of republics (as opposed to
> monarchies) is that "they afford too easy an inlet to
> foreign corruption." Foreign countries and their
> partisans here have often egged this country into war
> with their enemies: not only Israel, but England and the
> Soviet Union.
>
============
Hoffman replies:
Here we go with "American Constitutionalist" Sobran's bizarre tilt
toward monarchism, last seen in his perverse column airing British
author Samuel Johnson's execration of the American Revolution. Alexander
Hamilton was an enemy of freedom. Monarchies are at least as susceptible
to "foreign corruption" as republics; the most flagrant example of this
being the British Crown.
=============
Sobran writes:
> Of course a terrorist attack could come from many
> parties, including disaffected Americans or hostile
> aliens already within our borders. No foreign government
> would have to instigate or facilitate it.
> But is it likely that Iraq or Iran would sponsor
> such an attack, when the U.S. Government, predisposed to
> blame them, would most likely respond by shooting from
> the hip? By the same token, an enemy of Iran and Iraq
> might reckon that enraging the United States with a
> "terrorist" incident, staged by trained provocateurs,
> would be a convenient way of provoking the destruction of
> both countries.
=========
Hoffman replies:
Yes, of course. The stratagem is as old as the sinking of the Maine and
the Lusitania, and the Parl Harbor ruse. Tell us something we don't
know, Joe. Like how George W. Bush had Usama bin Laden's older brother
killed in a plane crash, or how Bush Sr. and Jr. did lucrative business
with SaudiBinLaden (SBL) prior to Sept. 11.
===========
Sobran writes:
> This is not to say that Israel would actually do
> such a thing.
===========
Hoffman replies:
Ha ha ha. You're quite the comedian, Joe.
==============
Sobran writes:
>The risks of failure would be enormous.
========
Hoffman replies:
The risks aren't so "enormous." The Israelis at the very LEAST monitored
and tracked the 9/11 hijackers before Sept. 11, shepherding them. Cf.
"Revisionist History" newsletters #20 and #23.
Moreover, with a tightly controlled US media, with a Masonic FBI and CIA
and the White House occupied by a Zionist agent, how are the risks
enormous? Risk of exposure presupposes an independent media and an
honest intelligence apparatus. America has neither. Israeli complicity
in the next terror attack can be dimsissed as an "urban myth," in the
same way that Deputy US Attorney General Larry Thompson on March 5
dismissed the significance of the apprehension of Israeli "art students"
and "moving van employees" in the wake of 9/11.
There's not much risk of failure/exposure in an America that watched its
own government bomb the Federal Murrah building in Oklahoma City; and
that now watches Rep. James Trafficante sent to prison as a payback from
the Israelis for his having helped free John Demjanjuk.
Moreover, risk of "exposure" in the context of a processed American
population, can in certain circumstances fuel the Cryptocracy, by the
mechanism of the "Revelation of the Method" (cf. this writer's "Secret
Societies and Psychological Warfare: 2001").
===========
Sobran writes:
> security is a matter of anticipating all possibilities.
> With millions of lives at stake, dismissing some
> scenarios as improbable is not enough. The 9/11 attacks
> were improbable too. That's why they succeeded.
>
> Today America's guard is up on many fronts. But on
> one front its guard remains conspicuously down. Any
> president who can call Ariel Sharon a "man of peace" with
> a straight face is in the wrong business. The frightening
> thing is that he seems to believe this. If so, he's the
> only one.
>
> The previous President Bush, for all his
> shortcomings, had a healthy suspicion of Israel. As a
> former CIA director, he knew what he was dealing with.
> Hasn't he tipped off his son?
=============
Hoffman replies:
One really must question Mr. Sobran's lucidity when he writes, "The
previous President Bush...had a healthy suspicion of Israel. As a former
CIA director...he knew what he was dealing with."
As a member of the masonic order of "Skull and Bones," i.e. the Russell
Trust at Yale, George Bush Sr. has never been an opponent of the
Israelis. He was simply of that wing of Aryan-Zionists who were
convinced that Yitzhak Rabin's approach toward swindling the
Palestinians out of their land (by means of negotiation) was the
craftier method, superior to Sharon's Neanderthal tactics; but the
objective for these Masons and Judaics has always been the same: the
rebuilding of the Temple of Jerusalem, secured in part by means of the
pacification of the indigenous Palestinians, either through guile (Oslo)
and CIA proxies (Arafat); or by massacre and war crimes (Jenin, Nablus,
Ramallah, Bethlehem).
George Herbert Walker Bush was an occult monster and the Chinese
Communist Party's man in the White House before Clinton. He betrayed his
drug-dealing crony Manuel Noriega and suckered Saddam Hussein into
invading Kuwait. Certainly Bush Sr. has "tipped off" Dubya, and the tip
is the same one Christ was given, "Bow down before Satan and all these
kingdoms will be yours." At this late date, we should have absolutely
no illusions about our deadly enemies. One wonders why Mr. Sobran
exhibits so wretched a naivete toward them.
It is disastrous that horribly confused and double-minded pundits like
Mr. Sobran disseminate such a stew of half-truth and seeming
disinformation, and yet still maintain chachet as beacons of opposition
to the establishment.
Such opposition is loyal opposition. It fits the Cryptocracy's profile
of permissible and controlled opposition, of safety-valve venting and
the generation of sufficient levels of "noise" necessary to keeping the
America people awed and bedazzled spectators, rather than militant and
clear-thinking detectives and radicals.
In retrospect, Mr. Sobran's title for his column, "Lowering our guard,"
would seem to be a double-entendre.
Michael A. Hoffman II
---------------------
<PRE>============================================================
50 BONUS + 5 COMMISSION-FREE TRADES. Open an Ameritrade(R)
cash account today with at least $1,000 and get a $50 cash
bonus. Plus, receive five commission-free trades:
<A HREF=" http://click.topica.com/caaameva2iTuca30J7Qf/Ameritrade
">http://click.topica.com/caaameva2iTuca30J7Qf/Ameritrade</A>
============================================================</PRE>
<PRE>Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press
The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849,
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA
24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau: <A HREF=" http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html
">http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html</A>
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect e-mail
letter intended only for those who have requested it. We have a strict anti-spamming
policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the sole responsibility of the
author(s) and do not reflect the views of advertisers or the transmitter.
Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.
</PRE>
<PRE>==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: <A HREF=" http://topica.com/u/?a2iTuc.a30J7Q
">http://topica.com/u/?a2iTuc.a30J7Q</A>
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
<A HREF=" http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
">http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register</A>
==^================================================================</PRE>
--- End Message ---
