--- Begin Message ---
-------- Original Message --------
From: Jakzun Da <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [thenewbushwhackerbrigade] Confirmed list of all
who had prior knowledge
1) George Bush, officially by CIA (August 6th, 2001)
2) George Tenet, CIA
3) Condoleeca Rice, briefed on August 6th
4) Dick Cheney, briefed on August 6th
5) Andy Card, briefed on August 6th
(Source: Washington Post)
7) Sen. Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the
Intelligence Committee, same briefing on Aug 6th as also:
8) Sen. Bob Graham, chairman of the Senate Intelligence
Committee
9) Florida GOP Rep. Porter Goss, the House Intelligence
Committee chairman
10) California Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the House panel's ranking
Democrat
11) John Ashcroft (between June and July 26th, but he didn't
confirm it yet and FBI claims, their warning wasn't
connected to the CIA warning
12) FAA (denied it again)
Source:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/05/16/bush.sept.11/index.html
"...Sen. Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the
Intelligence Committee, said the White House should have
revealed the warning earlier.
"The fact that they've waited this long to get it out is
troubling," said Shelby, R-Alabama.
However, he said the top members of the House and Senate
intelligence committees -- himself; Graham; Florida GOP Rep.
Porter Goss, the House Intelligence Committee chairman; and
California Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the House panel's ranking
Democrat -- received the same classified information as the
president.
Rice also told Senate Democrats in a meeting Thursday that
some of them were privy to the same information.
Graham told reporters he and his colleagues were given a
less detailed briefing than the one given to the president,
and said he was never given information about potential
hijackings.
And some members of the intelligence committees complained
that they had not been informed at all...."
To be added
?) Wally Kromgaard, CIA
?) George Bush Sr.
?) Robert Wright, FBI
?) Robert Mueller, FBI (still officially unconfirmed)
who else in the CIA had prior knowledge.
Who exactly had prior knowledge in the Pentagon.
I wanna have answers of Paul Wolfowitz and Top Advisor
Richard Perle.
I would also like to ask their friends Robert Zoellick and
Richard Armitage.
Also, since we were planning to wage war on the Taliban and,
they were officially "enemies of the state", why did Bush
give them $43M?
The Taliban was also entertained here last year by Bush and
company and, they were promised much. It�s a fact that they
were talking an oil deal with the Taliban that went bad and
the Arabs were threatened with accepting either "a carpet of
gold or a carpet of bombs" last summer. 9/11 could be
considered a preemptive strike from the threatened Arabs.
Isn't that treasonous, aiding and abetting a known
terrorist? Doesn't that mean that families of the 9/11
victims paid (thru taxes) for the attack that took their
loved ones? We all paid for it and, we paid for the weapons
they're using against our soldiers, too.
But, there's NO PROOF after 8 months that the Taliban did
anything. That means they didn't do it (until we can prove
they did). That means we�ve been bombing those people with
no proof. Why are we there if our intelligence sources can�t
find any links to 9/11? Shouldn�t our army stand down until
we have a REAL target to vanquish? This is genocide and,
we�re paying for Bush to slaughter at will.
But, Bush said he was looking at proof positive and he even
showed it to Blair, who said he was convinced, too. What
exactly WAS that proof they had? Surely, since, it has
proven to NOT link 9/11 to Al Queda they can tell us what it
was. If they can't tell us what their "proof" was, they are
caught lying (again).
And, what about Mike Vreeland, who wrote a warning while in
custody (in august) that was kept by his jailers until 9/11
really happened. They went public with this information
(http://www.copvcia.com
). It read: "Let one happen, stop the rest".
Also, the Bush video when he�s informed of the greatest
terrorist feat in history. His aide says whatever he says in
about 3 seconds. What could he say that adequately informed
the President of what just transpired in 3 seconds? "It�s
done?". Why don�t we see Bush�s eyes light up, why doesn�t
he say "WTF?!?"
WHY DOESN�T BUSH ASK ANY QUESTIONS? "What? Where? How? Who?
How Many? Ad infinitum. But, he simply sits there. In fact,
he continued reading with the kids as the second tower was
about to be hit.
In fact, NO ONE that was with Bush that day showed any shock
or horror like the rest of us did.
No single person gained as much on that day as Bush did. In
fact, he later "Hit the trifecta" in his opinion. Newsweek
was publishing an issue about the stolen vote, he was being
challenged for the White House records, and he needed
popularity. He got it.
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Take the Yahoo! Groups survey for a chance to win $1,000.
Your opinion is very important to us!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/NOFBfD/uAJEAA/Ey.GAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--- End Message ---
