--- Begin Message ---
WHY WE MUST CALL IT A CONSPIRACY
http://www.etherzone.com/2002/stang053102.shtml
By: Alan Stang
As your intrepid correspondent launches this new series of commentaries, it would be
helpful to explain what we shall be writing about. As always, we shall be elucidating
the queen of the issues--the one that separates the women from the girls: the
Conspiracy that orchestrates many of the horrors we presently suffer.
What do we mean by "Conspiracy?"
We mean the orchestrated scheme conducted by the billionaire totalitarian socialist
power-lusters who rule us, and whose purpose is to submerge our country in a brutal
world government that would impose a dictatorship on all people in all former nations,
a dictatorship so severe it would make Hitler look in retrospect like a simpering
playground bully.
It is important to establish what world government means. However respectable and
innocuous its advocates have made it, world government still means the destruction of
the U.S. government, for the simple reason that the two things are mutually exclusive.
You can have either the U.S. government--or you can have world government. You can't
have both, because two solid objects can't occupy the same space at the same time. An
American who schemes to destroy the U.S. government in behalf of a foreign power--some
other (world) government--is guilty of treason. If the world government conspirators
succeed, what was the United States would become simply a wide spot in the road--and
they are now very close to success, via immigration, international agreements, etc.,
among other subjects we shall discuss.
One is not supposed to talk about that. Such discussion breaks some unspoken rule. One
is allowed to talk about the effects of conspiratorial machination, about the surface
of events, but not about the conspiracy itself. Anyone who does is usually covered by
opprobrium extruded by kept capons in the media whose job is to obfuscate, especially
including the anatomical males at the New York Times, who put their pants on
backwards. Among their complaints is the accusation that revelations about a
"so-called conspiracy," are "simplistic," because they attribute everything to one
cause. As usual, the exact opposite is true. It is "simplistic" to the max to believe
that everything "just happens." According to the Just Happens school of historical
analysis, there are no basic causes and effects, no connections, no reasons. Things
"just happen," by themselves. It is much more taxing to uncover who met with whom,
said what to whom and did what with whom, just as flatfoot police work to uncover
clues is more taxing than mere speculation.
Another sissy accusation is that those of us who expose the Conspiracy oppose the U.S.
government. On the contrary, we expose the Conspiracy because our purpose is to
protect the historic system bequeathed us by the Constitution. The men who do
everything to destroy it are the termites who scheme to destroy our independence.
Remember, we are not talking about people who are sick, poor and illiterate, but about
the most powerful people in this country.
Do you mean that the conspirators we are talking about actually sit down around a
table and make plans?
Yes, that is exactly what we mean. The dictionary says that a conspiracy consists of
two or more people, who meet in secret for an evil end. All you need are those people
sitting around that table. A conspiracy does not need to incorporate under the laws of
Delaware or Nevada. It doesn't need to issue membership cards. If a couple or three
people meet secretly to plan a burglary, there is a conspiracy. Because secrecy is an
essential element of conspiracy, conspirators will do everything to stay under their
rock. When someone turns their rock over, they scatter. Exposure tends to destroy a
conspiracy, because when the victims discover its evil end, they rebel.
For instance, anyone who has been to the movies is familiar with the Mafia. Here is an
informal group of men who sit down at a table and plan. They don't exist officially,
on paper. They shrug, laugh and deny there is any such thing, but no one else denies
they are very real.
In the same way, once or twice a year, the most powerful people in the world meet at a
resort, surrounded by guards with machine guns, and decide what will happen to us, to
our lives our property and families, during the next year. This particular instrument
of the Conspiracy doesn't have a name. It consists merely of congenial megalopolists
who meet to plan policy. The most powerful people in the U.S. media--the men who run
the television networks and big American newspapers participate in those meetings, but
they have never reported a word that was said. In fact, David Rockefeller, of the
Trilateral Commission, another arm of the conspiracy, once explained that without the
cooperation of those media moguls, those meetings could not have taken place.
Investigators call the conspirators at these informal confabs where U.S. policy is
decided the Bilderbergers, after the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oostebeek, Holland, where
the first meeting convened in 1954, under the imprimatur of Nazi sympathizer Prince
Bernhard.
The only difference between the Mafia and the Bilderbergers or the Trilateral
Commission, etc., is that the Bilderbergers have an ample supply of Harvard
Professors, who provide protective coloration by means of ideology. If the mob were to
hire some Harvard Professors instead of more head busters, they would find themselves
less often in the slam. Indeed, the protection racket was a rudimentary effort in that
direction. "Buy my insurance, or I breaka you head." Because a Harvard professor is
trained to Pile it Higher and Deeper, he can say the same thing so it sounds as if it
almost makes sense.
Why must we expose the conspiracy?
We must because without such exposure we have no hope of winning the present battle
for America. Suppose I tell you that our country is going down the tubes because
things Just Happen; because we Just Happened to be at the wrong point on the cycle of
history that governs all nations; because a couple of soreheads in Oklahoma City Just
Happened to have some fertilizer and a truck; because most of the people who run the
Bush Administration Just Happen to belong to the same, exclusive organization the
people who ran the Clinton Administration Just Happened to join. What is your
response? You are sad, you are frustrated, but you do nothing and go home, because
there is nothing one can do about the cycle of history that governs all nations.
Without an understanding of why things happen and who is committing them, one would
always stagger blindly through events in a miasma. What does NAFTA mean? What is the
real purpose of gun confiscation? Why doesn't the government want pilots to be armed?
Whose side is George W. on? Why did the Soviet Union "collapse?" Without an
understanding of the conspiracy, one would never know.
Suppose, on the contrary, I tell you that the relentless promotion of sodomy, the
disaster in the government schools, the crisis on our borders, the international
agreements that have deported our industry, our foreign policy that intrudes into
every nation on earth--and on and on and on--suppose I prove to you that all these
things and then some are weapons employed in the same scheme to destroy America, by
specific individuals whose names and addresses we know. Suppose I show you that you
have lost your job, your house, your assets and your wife because of the machinations
of this handful of men. What do you do?
Now, you are galvanized. You turn off the tube, put down the beer and reach for the
Tennessee long rifle. You can't do anything about the cycle of history that governs
all nations, but you sure can give men with names and addresses a headache. The
conspirators understand this better than we do. That is why they ridicule every
attempt to expose them. An understanding of the Conspiracy is the Rosetta Stone that
is required to decipher the present riddle. When the light goes on, you will never
read the headlines the same way again.
The factotums of the Conspiracy appear on television every day, to interpret federal
policy and tell us what to think. They are beautifully groomed and dressed and
infinitely smooth. They are relatively easy to spot, because, almost invariably, they
have the personality of an android. They also have certain recognizable techniques,
which they use over and over again because they work. They are experts at the use of
dialectical materialism, of agents provocateur, of taking a couple of steps back in
order to take a step forward.
These are the things we shall be talking about henceforth in this space. These
commentaries are not designed to convince victims of the modern species of insanity
called "liberalism," what that means, but rather to ask questions few others may be
asking and suggest answers to those who really want to know what is happening. Welcome
aboard, and let me know what you think.
---------------------------------------------
Alan Stang was, for two decades, a senior writer for the John Birch Society's American
Opinion magazine, and was Robert Welch's closest confidant. A former talk-radio host,
he is also the author of ten books, including, most recently, Perestroika Sunset,
surrounding our Government's deception in the POW/MIA arena. He is a new columnist for
Ether Zone.
Published in the May 31, 2002 issue of Ether Zone. [This article may be reprinted
and distributed in its entirety, with aforementioned notice intact]
Copyright: 1997 - 2002 Ether Zone.
--
_______________________________________________
Get your free email from http://www.ultrapostman.com
Powered by Outblaze
--- End Message ---
