-Caveat Lector-

>From WND

}}}>Begin
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27732

Friday, May 24, 2002

The buck doesn't stop with Bush

Posted: May 24, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

Editor's note: The views expressed herein are the personal views of Larry Klayman.

By Larry Klayman



� 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

In recent days, new but predictable revelations about government incompetence and
recklessness in the
weeks leading up to Sept. 11 have emerged. The Federal Bureau of Investigation
and Central Intelligence Agency had gathered intelligence that Islamic radicals were
not only training at American flight schools � with the forecast aim of crashing
airliners into the World Trade Center � but general warnings were also picked up,
through electronic intercepts, that Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida was planning a major
attack on the United States.

In addition, Zacarias Moussaoui, an al-Qaida operative, who it would later turn out
was a conspirator in Sept. 11, would be taken into custody by the field office of the
FBI in Minnesota. His laptop computer, which contained clues of the Sept. 11 attack,
would never be searched.

Last but not least, a Judicial Watch client, Special Agent Robert Wright of the
Chicago field office of the FBI, had gathered crucial information about Islamic
terrorist money laundering which his superiors would ignore. When Special Agent
Wright's information was forwarded by me to Attorney General Ashcroft, I was told, in
Clintonesque parlance, that the Bush administration was tired of Judicial Watch's
"conspiracy theories." This squares with news just published this week that Ashcroft
was told about FBI neglect of the Sept. 11 warnings just after the attacks on the
World Trade Center and Pentagon, but sat on this information and covered it up.

In short, most of this information was available to high officials in the Bush
administration and, in particular, the Bush White House before Sept. 11. Indeed,
recent admissions show that presidential intelligence briefings contained warnings
that bin Laden-induced hijackings were about to occur as early as the weeks in
August leading up to Sept. 11. President Bush, despite these warnings, did not keep
the United States on high alert during the period leading up the World Trade Towers
and Pentagon attacks. The result is now clear: About 3,000 Americans lost their lives
and American prestige and invincibility has been forever tarnished.

But, despite this, in the months before these recent leaks occurred, President Bush,
enjoying sky-high popularity poll ratings in the wake of the Afghanistan war, has been
strutting around like a peacock, pleased with his performance and his political
standing. Perhaps he had begun to believe his administration's own spin � that he
saved the country from the grips of Osama bin Laden and is well on his way to re-
election in 2004.

Unfortunately, bin Laden has not been captured or killed, despite the president's
early predictions to take him "dead or alive," and recent revelations about Arab
terrorists jumping ships in U.S. ports, with the likely aim of commencing suicide
bombings or some other atrocity, do not square with the president's cocky attitude.

Why has this information about the Bush administration bungling just come to light,
despite calls by Judicial Watch and others, following Sept. 11, for the government to
own up to its failures, in a crash, all-out effort to shore up national security
weaknesses before another major terrorist attack(s) occurs? For the same reason
that Vice President Cheney's Energy Task Force refuses to release records about its
secret meetings with Enron and other lobbyists in the wake of the biggest corporate,
legal and political scandal to hit Washington since the sordid days of the Clinton
administration.

This Bush administration believes that it is not accountable to the American people,
and that it is above scrutiny if not the law. It has a "Father Knows Best" (and lets
hope the father is not Bush Sr.) view of government. And, for political reasons, not
the least of which deals with the congressional elections this fall � where
Republicans hope to re-capture control of the Senate and retain control of the House
� Bush and his colleagues do not want the full truth to be known.

While, from all reports, George W. Bush is not an avid historian, much less reader,
perhaps Dick Cheney has studied Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers,
where Hamilton, contrary to James Madison, espouses his view that "the people are
a great beast" and are not to be kept informed, much less consulted. This Tory view
was, not coincidentally, held by King George III in revolutionary times, and is not 
only
contrary to our Constitution, which furthers a government by and for the people, but
is dangerous to the survival of liberty and the nation. Because if the masses are not
kept informed for whatever reason, they will not be able to demand accountability of
their government.

But what is even more disturbing about the conduct of the Bush administration
following the recent revelations of its "blown" response to intelligence briefings, is 
its
dissembling to try to justify its mess-up. Rather than accepting responsibility for
having not taken sufficient action following the FBI-CIA alerts, it has sought to 
justify
its own reckless incompetence by stating that how could one have known, with
specificity, that the terrorists would strike on Sept. 11 against the World Trade
Towers and Pentagon with airplanes? (Ironically, this same administration has said
that general threat warnings are more credible than specific ones, since terrorists
rarely are prone to discuss their exact plans over wires, cellular phones and the
internet).

To add insult to injury, Vice President Cheney, who heads the Bush administration's
counterterrorism braintrust, intimated on Tim Russert's "Meet the Press" last Sunday,
that neither he nor the administration, including President Bush, would do anything
different in the future. (To the contrary, they suggested that perhaps more
devastating attacks would soon be on the way, and that they were effectively
powerless to head them off). If this is true, what, if anything, has this 
administration
learned from Sept. 11?

Sherlock Homes did not invent deductive reasoning. And, contrary to previous
popular belief, the country would appear to be in more jeopardy than even I � a
hardened government skeptic � have thought. Because the first, if not cardinal rule of
correcting a bad situation, is to admit where one went wrong � not to make excuses.
Continued denial, to save one's own political skin, will not "cut it" when the future 
and
the lives of millions of Americans are at stake.

What is wrong with a little honest humility, particularly in the face of one of the
biggest attacks on U.S. soil since the birth of the nation? Did George Washington
deny the obvious as he and his hapless and untrained soldiers were beaten badly by
British troops in the early stages of the Revolutionary War? No, they did not. Instead,
Washington and other colonial leaders admitted their failures, relieved incompetent
military commanders, "sucked it in," redoubled their efforts and resolve, asked
France for help, and went on to win the war and form the greatest nation on earth.

I am disheartened, as well, by some in the conservative media who, rather than
acting on their instincts to strengthen national security by exerting strong 
constructive
criticism on this administration, have become, perhaps out of loyalty or fear of being
retaliated against (i.e., White House party invitations are a difficult thing to 
lose), the
"yes men" of the Bush political spin machine.

The war against terrorism is not a war by Republicans (even assuming that they
represent conservatives, which they do not in large part) against Democrats. It is a
war on behalf of the people of this country, and should have no political persuasion.

While Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is a criminal who should be in San Quentin, rather
than regrettably occupying a seat in the greatest parliamentary chamber on earth,
ironically it is this Bush administration which created its own present day Clinton
monster by failing to do its duty and prosecute her for offenses ranging from
Chinagate to Pardongate. Now that she has the "audacity" to ask questions � from a
position of power as the de facto head of her party and likely vice presidential
candidate in 2004, and presidential candidate in 2008 � about the knowledge and
reaction of the president to intelligence briefings prior to Sept. 11, the Bush
administration squeals like a "stuck pig." They, and we, may not like the messenger
or her insincere motivation, but she "doth ask the right questions."

The hypocritical lack of accountability of the Bush administration, and its penchant 
for
secrecy, if not political "derriere covering," is unparalleled for a regime that 
claims to
be different from its criminal predecessor, which explained each successive scandal
as "an innocent bureaucratic SNAFU. "Certainly, it is different from the Truman
administration. As under Clinton, one will not find on the president's desk these days
the motto, "The Buck Stops Here." A more apt signage might be "Hear no evil. See
no evil. Do no evil."

In his column last Monday, conservative, but non-partisan columnist William Safire
correctly wrote:

I say: Finger-pointing away at the entire intelligence flop. That means investigate
both Clinton and Bush administration nonfeasance ..."

� Safire, "Independent Look At Intelligence Failures," New York Times, May 21,
2002.

Well, if the Bush administration � and its predecessor � will not come clean and
accept responsibility, then the people will have to legally take matters into their own
hands and force openness and responsibility in government. I aim to help do just
that.

No one is above the law, and I am fed up with politicians who think they are, no
matter what their poll ratings and standing may be! I don't even care if they call
themselves (compassionate) conservatives. The issues are not academic and trivial
� they concern the survival of each American, his or her family, and the nation as a
whole.



Larry Klayman is chairman and general counsel of government "watchdog"
organization Judicial Watch.
End<{{{

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to