-Caveat Lector- Let's just scrap the Bill of Rights by Harry Browne --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- June 13, 2002 1:00 a.m. Eastern
� 2002 WorldNetDaily.com If you pay attention to news about the "War on Terrorism," you may be a bit confused about what our government is doing. One day Mr. Macho tells us we're at war and we must put up with the intrusions of liberty that normally accompany war. The next day we're told this "struggle" may last beyond our lifetimes (or at least until after Nov. 2, 2004). But wars usually come to an end. So this must not be a war. Then we're told that people captured (no matter by whom) will be held in military prisons and tried by military courts. So this must be a war. But then we realize it can't be a war, because the Constitution provides that only Congress can declare war - and it hasn't done so. Thus this must not be a war. So is it war, or is it Memorex? Consistency It's neither. It's simply whatever the president chooses to call it on any given day. They're making up the rules as they go along. The only consistency is the constant invocation of the power of the president to do whatever he wants. Just as the shredding of the Constitution has put us at the mercy of congressmen who spend our money for whatever they choose, so the "War on Terrorism" has put us at the mercy of the Bush administration - which does whatever it wants in the name of "national security." Whatever the politicians choose to call it on any given day, they keep acting as though the country is at war with some foreign power. But since that foreign power isn't located in any specific part of the world, our government feels free to attack anyone it wants, anywhere it wants, anytime it wants - and call it a "preemptive" strike against terrorists and terrorist states. Proof? The government never provides any evidence to support its claims that some country is a proper target of attack. Realize that virtually everything you know about the "War on Terrorism" and virtually everything you hear in the news emanates - without proof - from the same politicians who lie to us regularly about budget surpluses and program reductions. In effect, we're supposed to believe everything they tell us - even though in any other situation we consider them generally to be deceiving, self-aggrandizing, power-hungry hypocrites. Wartime exceptions? We're told that the usual constitutional rules don't apply because the country is at war. We must put up with invasions of civil liberties - and we must allow the politicians to vote for boondoggles and trust that some part of what they appropriate will actually make the country safer. But while some constitutional provisions do mention exceptions, there are no exceptions specified for wartime. In fact, one reason we have the Constitution is to protect us from politicians at times of greatest danger. If it's important that they obey the Constitution when appropriating money, how much more important it is that they obey the Constitution when our lives are at stake?! Bill of Rights For the past 140 years, the politicians have been tearing down the Constitution - bit by bit. In early 2001, the only part of the Constitution that still provided any protection for us was the Bill of Rights. Even with outrages such as asset forfeiture and no-knock warrants, most accused Americans still enjoyed the ability to confront witnesses against them, a right to a speedy trial by jury, and protection from cruel and unusual punishment. But no more. Apparently, the Bill of Rights is a luxury Americans can no longer afford. At least that's the way George Bush, Dick Cheney and John Ashcroft see it. They've locked up Jose Padilla and thrown away the key. No attorney, no charges against him, no trial, no plans for a trial. Should we care? But who cares? After all, he's a terrorist, isn't he? Is he? How do we know that? Because the politicians told us so. The reason we have a Bill of Rights is to guarantee an open trial at which the evidence is available for all to see - rather than depending on the assurances of politicians who have already proven to be untrustworthy. What happens if one of those super-efficient FBI or CIA agents decides you are a terrorist? You might go to a military prison. No right to see an attorney - or even your family. No trial. And probably no guarantee you won't be tortured. But you're innocent! How are you going to prove it if you can't speak to anyone but the people who arrested you? Is this the kind of America you want to live in? <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
