-Caveat Lector-


<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

The CIA's use of agents/assets to pose as al-Qaeda terrorists 
(students of Rudy Dekkers' Venice Daycare Centre) mirrors the FBI's 
use of agents/assets to pose as white supremacists/militiamen (the 
FBI informers responsible for the OKC bombing).

Michel Chossudovsky shows that the CIA never severed itself from 
the 'real' al-Qaeda, as opposed to the faux one promoted by the USG 
and media, which in reality is : 'a loose collection of groups and 
individuals that doesn't even refer to itself as "Al Qaeda." Most of 
the affiliated groups have distinct goals within their own countries 
or regions, and pose little direct threat to the United States' (from 
the Monitor article below). Also see Chossudovsky: 
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html

Disturbing enough, other ethnic groups are being added to the 'al-
Qaeda' terrorist network such as Blacks and Hispanics:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27960

Robert Young Pelton said in a Salon interview:
'And then we created a bogeyman called al-Qaida, which is sort of 
similar to the term "Mafia," sort of an all-encompassing term. And 
that's not really appropriate because most of the people over there 
are just foreign volunteers who are fighting either in Kashmir or 
inside Afghanistan. And we've blown this international conspiracy way 
out of shape; it's really not as big and as mean and as well-financed 
or as intelligent as our government makes it out to be'.
http://www.salon.com/books/int/2002/04/23/pelton/print.html
___________________________________________________________________ 

Debunk the myth of Al Qaeda

Its size and reach have been blown out of proportion

By Kimberly A. McCloud and Adam Dolnik 

MONTEREY, CALIF. � News reports indicate that Al Qaeda, ousted from 
its camps in Afghanistan, is now on the loose, spreading terror 
around the world. 
Several recent attacks have been claimed by or attributed to the 
terrorist network, including an assault on a Jewish synagogue in 
Tunisia, multiple explosions in Yemen last month (including one at 
the US Embassy compound), attacks in the Philippines, and a fire in 
the Milan metro.

But is Al Qaeda really behind all these attacks? Analysts cite 
differences in modus operandi compared with alleged past attacks, as 
well as more probable perpetrators in those recent incidents. Still, 
Al Qaeda is likely to be the top suspect in future incidents. 
Victims, including states, may even blame Al Qaeda for political 
reasons, namely to gain US sympathy and support.

Would-be terrorists the world over may be inspired to perpetrate 
attacks, seeking to feel they are part of what they perceive as a 
large, powerful terrorist movement. The public perception that Al 
Qaeda is running wild is likely to increase fear, especially among 
Americans.

Such concern, when translated into a heightened vigilance about one's 
surroundings � particularly in light of this week's warnings about 
future attacks in the US � may not be a completely bad thing. But 
unchecked public fear, taken to an extreme, could immobilize 
citizens, jeopardize civil liberties, and lead America into too many 
fights abroad.

The United States and its allies in the war on terrorism must defuse 
the widespread image of Al Qaeda as a ubiquitous, super-organized 
terror network and call it as it is: a loose collection of groups and 
individuals that doesn't even refer to itself as "Al Qaeda." Most of 
the affiliated groups have distinct goals within their own countries 
or regions, and pose little direct threat to the United States. 
Washington must also be careful not to imply that any attack anywhere 
is by definition, or likely, the work of Al Qaeda.

This phenomenon of "exaggerated enemy" is not new.

In 1983, three spectacular suicide bombings in Beirut were claimed by 
the previously unknown "Islamic Jihad." Numerous subsequent attacks 
were attributed to the group. And while the intelligence community 
concluded that "Islamic Jihad" was a nom de guerre for the Lebanese 
Hizbullah, it was clear that many of the subsequent attacks were 
unrelated to the militant Shiia organization.

Still, the campaign succeeded in creating the image of an invincible 
force, and "Islamic Jihad" became a symbol to follow � much as Al 
Qaeda is today.

The US must be careful about its use of the term "Al Qaeda." 
Meaning "the base" in Arabic, it originally referred to an Afghan 
operational base for the mujahideen during the Soviet occupation in 
the '80s.

In the current context of Osama bin Laden's terror network, this name 
was imposed externally by Western officials and media sources. Mr. 
bin Laden has, in fact, never mentioned "Al Qaeda" publicly.

In the quest to define the enemy, the US and its allies have helped 
to blow it out of proportion. Posters and matchbooks featuring bin 
Laden's face and the reward for his capture in a dozen languages 
transformed this little-known "jihadist" into a household name and, 
in some places, a symbol of heroic defiance.

By committing itself to eradicating terrorism, the Bush 
administration has put itself in a difficult position, especially 
if "Al Qaeda" begins popping up all over the map. While the US 
government must be diligent in protecting its citizens, it cannot try 
to extinguish every terrorist flame that appears without further 
encouraging the phenomenon as well as exhausting its resources. 
America must choose its battles wisely.

Resisting immediate attribution of attacks to Al Qaeda is the first 
step in defusing the enemy. While the Bush administration has not 
necessarily been blaming all post-9/11 attacks on Al Qaeda, it has 
passively allowed others to claim themselves as Al Qaeda or to blame 
it.

By allowing Al Qaeda to become the top brand name of international 
terrorism, Washington has packaged the "enemy" into something with a 
structure, a leader, and a main area of operation.

An invisible, amorphous enemy may be even more frightening. But we 
must be honest with the facts in order to construct a viable long-
term strategy to combat terrorism.

� Kimberly A. McCloud and Adam Dolnik are research associates at the 
Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of 
International Studies.
 
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0523/p11s02-coop.html


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org 
OM 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- End Message ---

Reply via email to