-Caveat Lector-

Former Officials Say Enron Hid Gains During Crisis in California

Sun Jun 23, 9:26 AM ET

By DAVID BARBOZA The New York Times

HOUSTON, June 22 The Enron Corporation used undisclosed reserves to keep as
much as $1.5 billion in trading profits off its books during the California
energy crisis, according to six former managers and executives who handled or
reviewed the accounts.

The enormous reserves, which would have doubled the company's reported
profits, were hidden in late 2000 and early 2001, as energy prices soared in
California and politicians accused trading companies like Enron of price
gouging. The former Enron officials said that the company swelled the
reserves in hopes of damping the political firestorm.

Further, some former executives said, Enron manipulated the reserves to help
it report steady profit growth to Wall Street and credit rating agencies.
Investors generally are not willing to pay as much for the stock of a
volatile trading operation as they would for companies like Enron before its
collapse that report steady quarter-by-quarter growth.

The Securities and Exchange Commission ( news - web sites) and investigators
from the Justice Department ( news - web sites) have interviewed witnesses to
determine whether the practices violated securities laws by creating "cookie
jar reserves" or a kind of corporate slush fund to doctor quarterly earnings
reports, according to people who have been interviewed by investigators.

The existence of the huge reserves adds a strange twist to the Enron story.
The company filed for bankruptcy protection last December amid reports that
executives inflated profits and hid losses with off-balance-sheet
partnerships. But interviews with more than a dozen former executives and
managers suggest that the company at times also held back trading profits to
serve its political and financial ends.

The majority of these gains were "paper" profits on long-term contracts,
rather than cash that could have helped Enron stave off the liquidity crisis
that led to its collapse last fall. In any event, one former executive said,
the reserves were depleted in the months before Enron's bankruptcy.

The use of reserves to manage profits is outlawed, but it is not uncommon.
This month, the Microsoft Corporation agreed to settle an enforcement action
in which the S.E.C. charged it with maintaining huge reserves in the late
1990's that could have been used to enhance profits when the company's
earnings growth began to wane.

Former top executives at Enron, including Kenneth L. Lay, the longtime
chairman, and Jeffrey K. Skilling, the company's president and later chief
executive, said last week through their spokeswomen that they were aware of
the reserves but considered them proper.

Judy Leon, Mr. Skilling's spokeswoman, said that money was set aside mainly
in credit reserves to insulate Enron from the risk that California's
utilities could be bankrupted by the crisis and left unable to pay their
debts. "At no time did Mr. Skilling have any knowledge of inappropriate or
illegal activity in the reserve account," she said. The S.E.C. questioned Mr.
Skilling about the reserves late last year, according to a person who has
reviewed his testimony.

Accounting rules allow for credit reserves and, indeed, California's biggest
investor-owned utility, Pacific Gas and Electric, sought bankruptcy
protection in April 2001, owing Enron $500 million. The rules also permit
companies to reserve against specific contingencies, like litigation. And
trading companies can use so-called prudency reserves to protect against
market risks, like the inability to exit a trading position at a good price.


But six former Enron officials who handled or reviewed the accounts said that
Enron used prudency reserves to manipulate the reported profits of its energy
trading operations.

The economic value of energy trades particularly deals providing for the
delivery of electricity long in the future is highly subjective. As the
dominant trader, analysts say, Enron had great leeway to establish market
prices. Likewise, when profits seemed bloated during the California crisis,
executives said, it became common to give trades a "haircut," shifting a
portion of the profits into a reserve that could later be drawn down.

One former executive recounted how Enron traders made close to $500 million
on a single day in the summer of 2000, after a natural gas pipeline burst
near Carlsbad, N.M., and market prices spiked.

"We made such an incredible amount of money we didn't want to recognize it
all into earnings," said the executive, who like others interviewed requested
anonymity because of concern about being drawn into litigation. "We were
supposed to make $500 million in a quarter and we were doing it in a day."
Two other former Enron officials confirmed details of the episode.

Accounting experts said that the subjectivity of prudency reserves makes them
susceptible to abuse.

"If you're using trading reserves as a mechanism for understating your
positions in good times and therefore not reporting profits and later
reporting the old profits in times that aren't as good, that would clearly be
an abuse of the accounting rules," said Lynn Turner, a professor at Colorado
State University and the former chief accountant for the S.E.C.

During the energy crisis, power shortages led to rolling blackouts and price
spikes in California. Elected officials railed at power merchants, with Gov.
Gray Davis ( news - web sites) accusing them of profiteering and market
manipulation.

At the time, Enron executives denied the charges, blaming a poorly designed
energy market for California's problems. And while the company reported
profits of $350 million for the last three months of 2000 34 percent more
than a year earlier executives minimized the impact of the crisis on Enron's
bottom line.

"Now for Enron, the situation in California had little impact on fourth-
quarter results," Mr. Skilling told Wall Street analysts on a Jan. 22, 2001,
conference call. "Let me repeat that. For Enron, the situation in California
had little impact on fourth-quarter results." He explained that because Enron
did not own power plants in California, the company did "not invite the same
accusations the generators have faced regarding excessive profits."

The disclosure of internal documents last month describing ways that Enron's
traders operated in California's market prompted officials to renew their
demand for billions in refunds from energy companies. Told about the
reserves, Gov. Davis expressed fresh outrage.

"Enron's made such a killing off this state, they were embarrassed to
disclose it to their shareholders," the governor said on Friday in a
statement. "Unfortunately, Enron will live on as a symbol for everything that
has gone wrong with electricity deregulation."

Several high-ranking Enron executives said that the company began using
reserves to "smooth" or "manage" earnings growth as early as 1998, when
energy price spikes in the Midwest brought traders unwanted scrutiny.

Enron's disclosures about its reserves were limited, and, according to former
executives, incomplete. In its year-end report for 2000, it listed $452
million in "credit and other reserves." There was nothing disclosed about
prudency reserves.

Enron's use of the reserves was approved by Arthur Andersen, the company's
longtime auditor, and by Richard A. Causey, the company's chief accounting
officer. His lawyer, J. C. Nickens, said that Mr. Causey who left the company
after its collapse told Enron's board that the company was using a
combination of credit and prudency reserves.

W. Neil Eggleston, an attorney for the independent directors who have left
the board since Enron's collapse, said, "If the management of Enron was using
reserves to manipulate the profits of the company, the board was completely
unaware of it."

Kelly Kimberly, the spokeswoman for Mr. Lay, Enron's former chairman, said
that both the growth of the prudency reserves and their subsequent release
into the company's profit stream were appropriate.

"It is a common practice and in fact a responsible practice to increase
prudency reserves when volatility is high and when prices are rising," she
said. "In 2000, volatility was high and natural gas and electricity prices
rose at least fivefold over the course of the year. In 2001, when prices and
volumes declined, the prudency reserve would also have been adjusted
downward."

Patrick Dorton, a spokesman for Andersen, said the firm did not engage in any
wrongdoing. "Andersen auditors would never, under any circumstances, tolerate
an arrangement intended to manage earnings," he said. "Not in this situation,
or any other, did that happen."

Former managers and executives said there were at least three types of
reserve funds and that they totaled between $800 million and $2 billion at
various times in 2000 and 2001.

During the California energy crisis, the reserves skyrocketed, former
managers and executives said. Enron's traders were making more than enough to
meet profit targets. And there were concerns that the big gains would not
last.

"There were days when we were making $100 million," said another former Enron
manager with access to the trading records. "When you're making that kind of
money you have to ask yourself, `Are we the market?' Your earnings are
unfathomable, so you say, `Maybe we're too large. Maybe we ought to reserve
something.' "

------------------------
"In little more than a year we have gone from enjoying peace
and the most prosperous economy in our history, to a nation
plunged into war, recession and fear. This is a nation being
transformed before our very eyes."

http://www.truthout.com

Steve Wingate, Webmaster
ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to