-Caveat Lector-

From


World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org




WSWS : News & Analysis : North America

Profiteering and the "war on terrorism": Cheney�s former firm cashes in on US 
militarism

By Joseph Kay
25 July 2002

Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author

An important component of the growing political crisis within the United States is the 
relationship between
Vice President Dick Cheney and Halliburton Corp., the Fortune 500 oil services and 
construction company
Cheney headed between 1995 and 2000. In addition to accusations of accounting fraud, 
recent reports have
detailed the lucrative relationship between Halliburton and the American military. 
Cheney�s old firm has been
a major beneficiary of the expansion of US military operations around the world in the 
aftermath of
September 11.

Over the past several months, the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR) 
has been involved in a
$16 million project to construct cells at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba for alleged Taliban and 
Al Qaeda fighters
captured in Afghanistan. In Uzbekistan, KBR has a contract to run camps at the 
Khanabad air base, which
has been used extensively in the Central Asian war. Within Afghanistan, the company 
has been hired to
provide services at the Force Provider military camp.

These are only the most significant of Halliburton�s recent operations, and they are 
only the first of what will
likely be many contracts landed by the company in connection with the militarist 
policies of the American
government. According to a Pentagon press release, Halliburton has secured a 10-year 
contract designated
as �cost-plus-award-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite- quantity service.� This means 
the company has an
unlimited contract that guarantees reimbursements on stated costs in addition to a 
percentage award�a
sure source of profit and hundreds of million of dollars in potential revenue.

The history of Halliburton reflects the deepening of ties between the American 
government,
business�especially the oil industry�and the military. It is a prime example of what 
President Eisenhower
once termed the �military-industrial complex,� and it is Cheney who, perhaps more than 
any other individual,
personifies this relationship.

As a construction company, Halliburton has traditionally worked primarily for the oil 
industry, erecting oil
wells, pipelines and the like for major oil companies such as Chevron, Texaco and 
Shell.

For several decades, however, it has also aided in various military projects. It 
helped build bases in Vietnam
and built a naval air station in Texas. The company was one of the main contractors in 
the construction of the
Diego Garcia air base in the Indian Ocean, which has been crucial for American 
military operations in
Afghanistan and elsewhere. For the most part, up until the 1990s, these government 
contracts were of
secondary importance and did not form a major part of the company�s revenue.

It was in the early to mid-1990s that the company�s military contracts grew rapidly in 
number and size.
According to articles written in May of this year by Pratap Chatterjee of CorpWatch, a 
group that monitors
business practices, Halliburton was hired in 1992 by the government to present a 
report on the advisability
and feasibility of privatizing certain army functions, such as constructing camps and 
providing food for
soldiers The report�for which the company was paid nearly $9 million�was commissioned 
by the Defense
Department, then headed by Cheney, who was serving in the administration of the elder 
George Bush.

Of course, Halliburton recommended that such privatization go ahead, and became a 
chief beneficiary of the
process. The privatization was one of the largest carried out by the military, and 
became a windfall for the
construction company.

Two-and-a half years after leaving his job at the Pentagon, following Bush�s loss to 
Clinton in the 1992
election, Cheney became chief executive officer of Halliburton, the very company that 
had benefited so
handsomely from Cheney�s government actions. Cheney had no prior history in business 
administration or the
construction industry. His sole qualification was his close relationship with the 
military establishment.
According to the current CEO of the company, David Lesar, Cheney �never pitched a 
particular contract or
closed a piece of business. He opened the door.�

In addition to Cheney, Halliburton hired Cheney�s chief of staff from his Pentagon 
years, David Gribben, who
became the company�s chief liaison with the Defense Department. Gribben left with 
Cheney in 2000 to
become director of congressional relations for the Bush-Cheney transition team. 
Gribben was replaced at
Halliburton by Joe Lopez, a retired four-star general, former commander-in-chief of US 
forces in southern
Europe, and close associate of Cheney. Richard Armitage, the current assistant 
secretary of state, is a
former Halliburton consultant.

Cheney and his former Pentagon associates did indeed open many doors. Government 
business for
Halliburton increased sharply after 1995. During Cheney�s five years, the company 
doubled the amount of
revenue it received from government contracts.

Over the past decade, KBR has brought in a total of $2.5 billion from military 
activities, a large portion of
which has come from its operations in the Balkans, where a contract originally valued 
at $4 million has
blossomed into a multi-billion dollar deal. In 1999, KBR signed a five-year, $731 
million extension with the
Army to continue its work in the region.

Like its current contract in Central Asia, Halliburton�s deals with the government are 
generally cost-plus. In
the past, the profits have been as high as 8 percent, compared to an average rate of 
profit for the economy
as a whole of about 3 percent. According a recent article in the New York Times, KBR�s 
services in Central
Asia will cost the government 10 to 20 percent more than if the military performed the 
services itself.

In addition to the military contracts, Cheney�s government connections helped 
Halliburton secure $1.5 billion
in federal loans and insurance subsides in 1999 and 2000. This compares with the $100 
million Halliburton
received during the five years before Cheney became CEO. Many of these loans have been 
used to
construct oil pipelines and wells in Angola, Nigeria and Brazil.

According to a report from the Center for Public Integrity, a corporate watchdog 
group, the company also
used its loans from the American government�s Export-Import Bank to finance a project 
with the Russian
company, Tyuman Oil, for extraction of oil from Siberia. The report cites Russian 
intelligence officers who
have linked the Alfa Group, which controls Tyuman, to the Russian mafia and the 
criminal looting of state-
owned enterprises that took place during the early 1990s.

In 2000, KBR was charged with overcharging the government by several million dollars 
during the mid-1990s,
while Cheney was at the helm. The case was based on the testimony of Dammen Gant 
Campbell, a former
contracts manager for KBR. According to T.C. McIntosh, a Pentagon criminal 
investigator who collaborated
with a US assistant attorney in developing the case, KBR �had the upper hand with the 
Pentagon because
they knew the process like the back of their hand.� The company �gets away with what 
it can get away with.�
A civil settlement of $2 million was eventually reached, and criminal charges were 
dropped.

This was not the only case in which suspicions were raised that KBR was defrauding the 
government by
overcharging for its military contracts. The General Accounting Office (GAO), the 
congressional body that
monitors government spending, found that the army did little to oversee its own 
contracts. According to the
GAO, this allowed KBR to benefit from cost increases in its work in the Balkans.

Despite its lucrative government contracts, Halliburton began to run into trouble in 
the late 1990s, toward
the end of Cheney�s tenure. Its acquisition of Dressar Industries brought with it 
numerous unforeseen
liabilities related to the use of asbestos in construction projects.

According to a New York Times article published in May of this year, the company 
responded to its earnings
troubles by altering its method of accounting for cost overruns. Many of the 
non-governmental construction
jobs that Halliburton completed during this time were pre- quoted: Halliburton 
promised to complete a job at a
certain price. Any costs above this price were subject to negotiation between 
Halliburton and the company
that had contracted its services. There was no guarantee that the Halliburton would 
receive any of these
funds. Nevertheless, the company began to book all of these overruns as revenue, 
whereas it previously
booked as revenue only that portion which had been promised by customers.

The company has claimed that all of its accounting methods were in line with Generally 
Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP). However, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has begun an 
investigation that
could lead to civil charges.

Halliburton also faces a number of lawsuits from shareholders, including one brought 
by the right-wing group,
Judicial Watch. According to that suit, Halliburton fraudulently increased revenue by 
$98 million in 1999, $113
million in 2000, and $234 million in 2001.

The accounting manipulations had an immediate financial benefit for Cheney, by 
delaying a decline in
Halliburton�s stock price until after he left the firm. The vice president ended up 
giving away many of his
Halliburton stock options, but not before he had cashed in and netted over $20 
million, after taxes. Including
the stock options that he exercised, Cheney brought in almost $30 million during his 
last two years at the
company. Since his departure, Halliburton stock has plunged by more than 75 percent 
and thousands of
workers have been laid off.

In response to these revelations, Cheney�s continued tenure as vice president has been 
openly questioned.
A July 12 article in BusinessWeek magazine asked, �Will the SEC�s Halliburton probe 
turn the Veep into a
White House liability?� A recent editorial in the Washington Post, while defending 
Bush against accusations
concerning his relations with Harken energy, was noticeably reticent when it came to 
defending Cheney�s
business practices. The Post suggested that Cheney should be held responsible for any 
illicit dealings.

The relations between Cheney and Halliburton are paralleled by many other officials 
within the Bush
administration, including Bush himself. Nevertheless, as part of an effort to save the 
administration as a
whole, Cheney could become a focal point in the conflict within American ruling 
circles that has been fueled by
the wave of accounting scandals and the sharp decline in the stock market.







Copyright 1998-2002
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without 
charge or profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for 
non-profit research and
educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth 
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to