-Caveat Lector-

~~for educational purposes only~~
[Title 17 U.S.C. section 107]

A short, sad history of taxation
By John Seiler

America was born in a tax revolt. The founders decried
"taxation without representation." On Dec. 16, 1773,
revolutionaries in Boston dumped tea into the harbor
rather than let the British collect taxes on it.

On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was
signed, charging of King George III, "He has erected a
multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of
officers to harass our people, and eat out their
substance."

The new Constitution of 1787 severely limited taxation,
basically allowing only small import duties - a fiscal
constraint designed to prevent the federal government
from growing too large. The states were free to use
internal taxation, such as property and sales taxes, as
they saw fit.

The Civil War changed that when President Lincoln
imposed the first income tax to help pay for the Union
war effort. After the war, the tax lingered until several
court cases, such as Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust
Co. in 1895, ruled it unconstitutional.

Unfortunately, the 16th Amendment, ratified in 1913,
allowed, "The Congress shall have power to lay and
collect taxes in incomes, from whatever source derived
... ." The new tax promptly plunged the country into the
recession of 1913-14. Revival came with U.S. industries
providing war goods to the European combatants in
World War I, which began in 1914. American
involvement in the war in 1917 depended on using the
new income tax to pay for soldiers and armaments.

The income tax first was imposed mainly only on the
rich, with the top rate being 7 percent on income more
than $500,000 (about $10 million in today's money). But
it taxed such fellows as Edison and Ford, meaning they
had less money to invest in their inventions and
factories.

Two world wars, the New Deal and Great Society welfare
programs and new regulatory agencies vastly expanded
the government, so the middle class and the poor
eventually had to be included, bringing us today's
pervasive, confiscatory, x labyrinthine tax code.

Although the poor today don't pay an "income tax," they
do pay the 15.3 percent payroll tax for Social Security
and Medicare (including the half of that tax supposedly
paid by the "employer" but actually paid by the
employee), which in reality is an income tax at twice the
rate rich people paid in 1913.
The IRS today has vast powers to confiscate wealth
without a jury trial, to investigate any person or
corporation, and to fine or jail those it considers
offenders.

Tax rationalizations

Taxation supporters offer any number of reasons why
we need high taxes: Taxes support government
programs that protect or improve society. Death, or
estate taxes, are an economic equalizer that keep
hardened classes from forming. Most crassly, politicians
use their proceeds to demonstrate effectiveness, bring
government projects to their hometowns as pork
projects, and thus win re-election.

This is not, as you may have guessed, what the founders
had in mind. One practical problem is that taxes, like
government programs, are rarely sunsetted. The
"temporary" 3 percent federal telephone excise tax was
first imposed in 1898 to pay for the Spanish-American
War, but is still on the books because President Clinton
vetoed a repeal in 2000.

The California public safety sales tax increment was
made permanent in 1993.
Philosophically speaking, a growing tax burden is an
anathema to a free society. Taking nearly 50 percent of
a person's labor - often for programs the person might
object to strongly - is what the Declaration called "a long
train of abuses and usurpations" of the liberties of a free
people. It is despotism by taxation.

Another problem is that government has no competition.
Few people can opt out of Social Security, Medicare or
other expensive programs. Without competition,
government programs become bloated and inefficient,
protecting their own turf instead of serving the people
they're supposed to.

Taxation and growth

There's also a connection between taxation and
economic growth. The income tax was, of course, but
one factor in growth or recession; but it always was a
factor.

How do taxes affect growth? During the economic
slowdown of 1960, candidate John F. Kennedy
promised "to get America moving again." His tax cut
proposal, enacted in 1964 just after his death, cut the
top tax rate to 70 percent from 90 percent. That helped
spark the boom of the late 1960s.
Unfortunately, his successors, Presidents Johnson and
Nixon, spent lavishly on the Vietnam War, the Great
Society welfare state and the Apollo moon program.
This brought about a 10 percent income tax surcharge
passed in 1968 and inflation that pushed people into
higher tax brackets, the notorious "bracket creep" of the
1970s, bringing "stagflation" through most of that
decade.

Late in the decade people finally had enough of inflation
and taxes. The Proposition 13 tax revolt in California in
1978 ignited anti-tax fever across the land.

After becoming president in 1981, Ronald Reagan cut
taxes, dropping the top rate eventually down to 28
percent in 1986. He also reappointed Paul Volcker as
Fed chairman, providing some check on inflation. Except
for the recession of 1990-91 (following the Bush tax
increase) and a small slump late last year (following
state tax increases and other problems), the United
States has enjoyed fairly steady growth.

What about the current stock market decline? It still
hasn't produced another recession and it is unclear if the
economy will follow the market, or the other way around.
One burden on the market is additional state tax
increases earlier this year (which I wrote about in my
June 23 Commentary story, "States of Taxation"),
fluctuations in the dollar's value, President Bush's weak
tax cuts last year - which expire in eight years, making
planning difficult - and of course the corporate
accounting scandals.

Taxes hurt

When I was in Sacramento last month, I was not
surprised but still dismayed watching Democratic
senators, such as Senate President John Burton, D-San
Francisco, blithely propose tax increases as if there
would be no ill effects either on the economy at large or
families in particular. Burton said it was like a business
taking out a loan.

Hardly. A business loan is voluntary - and the lender gets
his money back, with interest.

By contrast, a tax increase means families rich and poor
have less money to spend and invest, either in their own
homes or in businesses. That means fewer jobs and a
slower economy.

It also means less freedom. The taxpayer is forced to
give up his money for something he wouldn't pay for on
his own, indeed for something he may vigorously
oppose. He is forced to spend many hours or days a
year filling out complex tax forms and worrying about a
fine or a prison sentence.

The history of American taxation since the 1913 income
tax was imposed is clear: The founders were right to
loathe it and patriots should seek to abolish it. As in
1776, taxation is tyranny.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to