-Caveat Lector-

From

Libertarian Party Online
Original story: http://www.lp.org/press/archive.php?function=view&record=598



Bush�s plan to launch invasion of Iraq is totally unjustified,


Libertarians say

August 8, 2002

WASHINGTON, DC -- President Bush�s unfolding plan to invade Iraq is totally 
unjustified,
Libertarians say, because that nation poses no direct threat to the United States.

�Before the president risks the life of even one American soldier, he needs a reason, 
not an
excuse,� said Steve Dasbach, Libertarian Party executive director. �Unless the United 
States
is at risk of an Iraqi military attack, Bush�s proposal to invade that nation should be
denounced for what it is: reckless foreign interventionism.�

Yet a full-blown war against Iraq appears inevitable, according to administration 
sources,
after reports on Wednesday that all of Bush�s top national security advisors agree on 
the
need to topple the Iraqi dictator. The most likely scenario involves using 200,000 U.S.
ground, air, and naval troops to invade Iraq as early as the winter of 2003.

But one crucial fact has been ignored in the debate, Libertarians say: Saddam has not
committed an act of aggression against the United States.

�Wars that are not defensive are merely acts of aggression against sovereign nations,�
Dasbach said. �And wars that are launched by presidents, rather than formally declared 
by
Congress as the Constitution requires, are illegal.�

Moreover, while the U.S. government has made vague claims that the Iraqi regime has
terrorist links, it has produced no public evidence specifically linking Saddam to the
September 11 attacks, Dasbach pointed out.

�Since Bush has no legitimate reason for waging war on Iraq, he has cobbled together a 
list
of accusations, none of which provide sufficient justification for invading a 
sovereign nation
and risking American lives,� he said. For example, Bush claims that:

* Saddam Hussein is a ruthless dictator. �True enough, but there are dozens of ruthless
dictators around the globe, starting with Fidel Castro; the leaders of Egypt, Jordan, 
and
Saudi Arabia; the Chinese communists; and various tyrants sprinkled throughout Africa,
Asia, and Latin America,� Dasbach said. �Is Bush going to send troops to topple them 
all?�

According to Freedom House, an organization that tracks the status of democracy around
the world, only 120 of the world�s 192 nations are electoral democracies, Dasbach 
noted.
�So unless Mr. Bush plans to launch strikes on the 72 other captive nations, he owes 
the
American people an explanation as to why they should fear Iraq more than other despotic
regimes,� Dasbach said.

* Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. �According to the Pentagon, 12 countries have
nuclear weapons programs, 13 have biological weapons, 16 have chemical weapons and 28
have ballistic missiles,� Dasbach said. �So what makes Saddam�s chemical weapons more
menacing than, say, Pakistan�s nuclear bomb?

* Saddam supports terrorism. �According to the State Department�s official list of 
terrorist
sponsors, 45 nations have active al Qaeda cells,� Dasbach said. �So even if terrorists 
are
operating inside Iraq, that in itself makes Iraq no more of a threat to the United 
States than
Malaysia, Somalia, or the Philippines.�

The bottom line is that Bush�s wide-ranging indictment against Saddam Hussein is 
missing
one key element: proof that Iraq poses a direct threat to the United States, Dasbach 
said.

�Instead of struggling to find a justification for war, Mr. Bush should be looking for 
a way to
avoid war � and avoid the needless loss of American lives that could result.�



Copyright � 1994-2002, Libertarian Party, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved
worldwide.




For press inquiries, see: http://www.lp.org/press/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without 
charge or
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of 
information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to