-Caveat Lector-

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Easing of Marijuana Laws Angers Many Britons

August 12, 2002
By SARAH LYALL






LONDON, Aug. 9 - At the run-down Stockwell housing project
here, the potheads were complaining about the smackheads.

"Right down there, I saw a guy injecting a girl into her
neck," said James Haind, 28, his indignation wrapped in a
cloud of smoke. Hanging out recently at the project's
skateboard park with his friends, their skateboards and
their stashes of weed, he offered himself as living proof
that marijuana does not lead inevitably to harder drugs.

"A sensible, stable person will not turn to heroin,"
declared Mr. Haind, an out-of-work sign painter who
estimates that he has been getting high for half his life.
"That's for the more stupid people."

That is just the message the government seems to have sent
to Brixton, in South London, where a six-month experiment
in loosening the national drug laws has just ended. The
program pleased Brixton's smokers, and even the police. But
it left many residents feeling that their neighborhood had
turned into an open-air drug bazaar, where teenagers
brazenly smoke on the street and dealers set up shop next
to fruit sellers in the market, hissing "skunk weed, skunk
weed" at pedestrians.

"People started smoking openly, whereas before they'd have
their little hideaways," said the Rev. Chris Andre-Watson,
pastor of the Brixton Baptist Church, who runs a mentoring
program for teenage boys and says the drug experiment has
left many youths "zombied out."

Partly as a result of Brixton's trial, the government
recently announced plans to downgrade the criminal
penalties for smoking pot in a country where an estimated
five million people are habitual users. Although the plan
is an acknowledgment that drugs like heroin and cocaine are
far more harmful than marijuana, the mixed reviews here
raise a host of questions about loosening marijuana laws.

Under the experiment, people caught smoking marijuana in
Lambeth Borough, which includes Brixton, got off with
warnings rather than arrests, leaving the police free to
pursue more serious criminals. The police said it led to an
overall decline in crime and saved much police time.

Mr. Haind and his smoking companions were thrilled. "For me
and my friends, it's all good - we don't have to worry
about getting hassled if we want to smoke a little herb,"
said David Reading, 21, a would-be record producer just out
of college.

But others were angry at the way pot-selling and smoking
had been thrust so clearly in the open.

Ros Griffiths, director of the Employment Cafe, a job
center and Internet coffee shop, said she was unsure what
had offended her more: when a dealer grabbed a loudspeaker
at the weekly farmer's market and yelled, "Come and get
your weed here!" - or when a teenager sauntered through her
door and sought advice on setting up a cannabis cafe.

"By the time I finished with him, he was suddenly put off
the idea," she recalled grimly.

Ms. Griffiths said she resented the way the drug experiment
transformed Brixton, long the center of London's black
population and now an increasingly vibrant multiracial
community, into a magnet for drug use. "Suddenly people
were thinking, `Yeah - let's go to Brixton and smoke
cannabis!' " she said.

Mr. Andre-Watson was waiting at a bus stop recently when a
pair of teenagers lit up in front of an elderly lady. "I
said, `Do you know that it's actually still illegal?' " the
pastor recalled. "And they said, `Everbody's doing it, and
no one's doing anything about it.' "

He and other residents complained so bitterly about drug
dealing that after negative newspaper stories, the police
finally sent officers this month to clear the streets.

But how long the stepped-up presence will persist is
anybody's guess. When London as a whole relaxes its
marijuana policy under the new legislation, people in
Brixton are predicting that the open-air dealers will be
back, at the busy subway station and up and down
Coldharbour Lane.

Indeed, until this week, there were dozens of opportunities
to buy pot on a Brixton street crowded with families and
stores. Few people were under the illusion that marijuana
was the sole product being offered.

"It's not like people stand on one side of the street
dealing cannabis, and on the other side they're dealing
crack and cocaine," Ms. Griffiths said. "It's the same
person."

Trying to address that problem, the new drug law, whose
passage by the Labor-controlled Parliament is a sure thing
in the next legislative session, provides for increased
penalties for pushing drugs, particularly hard drugs.

That hardly affects the youths doing daredevil stunts on
skateboards and BMX bikes at the skateboard park, who say
they mostly grow their own pot anyway.

"We really don't see it as a drug at all," said Mr.
Reading, helping himself to a fat joint filled with skunk,
a souped-up form of marijuana. The drug helps him find his
skateboarding groove, he said.

"It's not a dis - what's the word? - well, I still have my
balance," he explained. "Although sometimes days go by -
and before you know it a week's gone by, and you haven't
done anything you're supposed to do, like get a job."

Ashley Finnegan, 30, a nursery school teacher who lives in
the Stockwell housing project, said she far prefers the
stoned guys at the skating park to the alcoholics and
addicts along her hallway. She grows pot at home and smokes
a joint or two a night, although never in front of her
4-year-old son, she said.

"Alcoholics in this area are far more likely to be abusive,
to be begging on the streets," she said. "If anything, pot
mellows people down."

Mr. Haind, the sign painter, agreed. "There'd be a
full-scale riot here if we weren't all stoned," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/12/international/europe/12BRIX.html?ex=1030156044&ei=1&en=482790f3c63489d2



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to