--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM IN THE MID EAST: Part II
WHY JUDEO-CHRISTIANS SUPPORT WAR
C. E. Carlson
The French author, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote Democracy in America when he traveled
here in the first third of the 19th Century. In ringing tones he sang the praises of
America's invulnerable strength and spirit. He attributed its greatness to its
citizens' sense of morality... even with the abundant church attendances he observed
in America. De Tocqueville wrote in French and is credited with this familiar quote:
AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD, AND IF AMERICA EVER CEASES TO BE GOOD, SHE WILL
CEASE TO BE GREAT.
De Tocqueville could see the power of America, but he could not have known in 1830
that she was soon to be under an attack aimed at its churches and the very sense of
morality that he extolled.
First, there was a War Between the States, which scarred the powerful young nation in
its strapping youth. A worse attack on America was to commence near the turn of the
20th century. This was the onset of an attack on American Christianity that continues
unabated against the traditional, Christ-following church. This attack, which author
Gordon Ginn calls "The final Apostasy," began with a small very wealthy and determined
European political movement. It had a dream, and the American churches stood in its
way.
The World Zionist movement, as its Jewish founders called themselves, had plans to
acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though most were far from homeless,
and many did not want another home. Not any land would do. World Zionists wanted a
specific property that American Christians called "the Holy Land." But if these
Zionists read "Democracy in America" or any of the journals of any of America's
churches, which no doubt they did, they could not help but know that Jerusalem was not
theirs to have. As self-proclaimed Jews, they were, according to the Christian New
Testament, the persecutors of Christ and most of his early followers, and the
engineers of his crucifixion. America's traditional churches in the 19th Century would
never stand for a Jewish occupation of Jesus' homeland.
World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its religious
orientation. One of the tools used to accomplish this goal was an obscure and
malleable Civil War veteran named Cyrus I. Schofield. A much larger tool was a
venerable, world respected European book publisher--The Oxford University Press.
The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a
pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield's role was to re-write the King
James Version of the Bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between
verses and chapters, and on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press
used Scofield, a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed such as man
for a front. The revised bible was called the Scofield Reference Bible, and with
limitless advertising and promotion, it became a best-selling "bible" in America and
has remained so for 90 years.
The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation, subverting minor
passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a revolutionary book that
radically changed the context of the King James Version. It was designed to create a
subculture around a new worship icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not
yet exist, but which was already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded
authors of World Zionism.
Scofield's support came from a movement that took root around the turn of the century,
supposedly motivated by disillusionment over what it considered the stagnation of the
mainline American churches. Some of these "reformers" were later to serve on
Scofield's Editorial Committee.
Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and rapturists, most of whose credibility
fizzled over their faulty end times prophesies. His mentor was one John Nelson Darby
from Scotland, who was associated with the Plymouth Brethren and who made no less than
six evangelical trips to the US selling what is today called "Darbyism." It is from
Darby that Scofield is thought to have learned his Christian Zionist theology, which
he later planted in the footnotes of the Scofield Reference Bible. It is possible
that Scofield's interest in Darbyism was shared by Oxford University Press, for Darby
was known to Oxford University. A History of The Plymouth Brethern By William Blair
Neatby, M.A.
The Oxford University Press owned "The Scofield Reference Bible" from the beginning,
as indicated by its copyright, and Scofield stated he received handsome royalties from
Oxford. Oxford's advertisers and promoters succeeded in making Scofield's bible, with
its Christian Zionist footnotes, a standard for interpreting scripture in
Judeo-Christian churches, seminaries, and Bible study groups. It has been published
in at least four editions since its introduction in 1908 and remains one of the
largest selling Bibles ever.
The Scofield Reference Bible and its several clones is all but worshiped in the ranks
of celebrity Christians, beginning with the first media icon, evangelist Billy Graham.
Of particular importance to the Zionist penetration of American Christian churches
has been the fast growth of national bible study organizations, such as Bible Study
Fellowship and Precept Ministries. These draw millions of students from not only
evangelical fundamentalist churches, but also from Catholic and mainline Protestant
churches and non-church contacts. These invariably teach forms of
"dispensationalism," which draw their theory, to various degrees, from the notes in
the Oxford Bible.
Among more traditional churches that encourage, and in some cases recommend, the use
of the Scofield Reference Bible is the huge Southern Baptist Convention of America,
whose capture is World Zionism's crowning achievement. Our report on Southern Baptist
Zionism, entitled "The Cause of the Conflict: Fixing Blame.
Scofield, whose work is largely believed to be the product of Darby and others, wisely
chose not to change the text of the King James Edition. Instead, he added hundreds of
easy-to-read footnotes at the bottom of about half of the pages, and as the Old
English grammar of the KJE becomes increasingly difficult for progressive generations
of readers, students become increasingly dependent on the modern language footnotes.
Scofield's notes weave parts of the Old and New Testaments together as though all were
written at the same time by the same people. This is a favorite device of modern
dispensationalists who essentially weigh all scripture against the unspoken and
preposterous theory that the older it is, the more authoritative. In many cases the
Oxford references prove to be puzzling rabbit trails leading nowhere, simply
diversions. Scofield's borrowed ideas were later popularized under the labels and
definitions that have evolved into common usage today--"pre-millennialism,"
"dispensationalism," "Judeo-Christianity," and most recently the highly political
movement openly called "Christian Zionism."
Thanks to the work of a few dedicated researchers, much of the questionable personal
history of Cyrus I. Scofield is available. It reveals he was not a Bible scholar as
one might expect, but a political animal with the charm and talent for self-promotion
of a Bill Clinton. Scofield's background reveals a criminal history, a deserted wife,
a wrecked family, and a penchant for self-serving lies. He was exactly the sort of
man the World Zionists might hire to bend Christian thought--a controllable man and
one capable of carrying the secret to his grave. (See The Incredible Scofield and His
Book by Joseph M. Canfield).
Other researchers have examined Scofield's eschatology and exposed his original work
as apostate and heretic to traditional Christian views. Among these is a massive work
by Stephen Sizer entitled Christian Zionism, Its History, Theology and Politics,
Christ Church Vicarage, Virginia Water, GU25 4LD, England
We Hold These Truths is grateful to these dedicated researchers. Our own examination
of the Oxford Bible has gone in another direction, focusing not on what Scofield
wrote, but on some of the many additions and deletions The Oxford University Press has
continued to make to Scofield Reference Bible since his death in 1921. These
alterations have further radicalized the Scofield Bible into a manual for the
Christian worship of the State of Israel beyond what Schofield would have dreamed of.
This un-Christian anti-Arab theology has permitted the theft of Palestine and 54 years
of death and destruction against the Palestinians, with hardly a complaint from the
Judeo-Christian mass media evangelists or most other American church leaders. We
thank God for the exceptions.
It is no exaggeration to say that the 1967 Oxford 4th Edition deifies--makes a God
of--the State of Israel, a state that did not even exist when Scofield wrote the
original footnotes in 1908. This writer believes that, had it not been for misguided
anti-Arab race hatred promoted by Christian Zionist leaders in America, neither the
Gulf War nor the Israeli war against the Palestinians would have occurred, and a
million or more people who have perished would be alive today.
What proof does WHTT have to incriminate World Zionism in a scheme to control
Christianity? For proof we offer the words themselves that were planted in the 1967
Edition, 20 years after the State of Israel was created in 1947, and 46 years after
Scofield's death. The words tell us that those who control the Oxford Press recreated
a bible to misguide Christians and sell flaming Zionism in the churches of America.
There is little reason to believe that Scofield knew or cared much about the Zionist
movement, but at some point, he became involved in a close and secret relationship
with Samuel Untermeyer, a New York lawyer whose firm still exists today and one of the
wealthiest and most powerful World Zionists in America. Untermeyer controlled the
unbreakable thread that connected him with Scofield. They shared a password and a
common watering hole--and it appears that Untermeyer may have been the one who
provided the money that Scofield himself lacked. Scofield's success as an
international bible editor without portfolio and his lavish living in Europe could
only have been accomplished with financial aid and international influence.
This connection might have remained hidden, were it not for the work of Joseph M.
Canfield, the author and researcher who discovered clues to the thread in Scofield
family papers. But even had the threads connecting Scofield to Untermeyer and Zionism
never been exposed, it would still be obvious that that connection was there. It is
significant that Oxford, not Scofield, owned the book, and that after Scofield's
death, Oxford accelerated changes to it. Since the death of its original author and
namesake, The Scofield Reference Bible has gone through several editions. Massive
pro-Zionist notes were added to the 1967 edition, and some of Scofield's most
significant notes from the original editions were removed where they apparently failed
to further Zionist aims fast enough. Yet this edition retains the title, "The New
Scofield Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I. Scofield." It's anti-Arab,
Christian subculture theology has made an enormous contribution to war, turning!
Christians into participants in genocide against Arabs in the latter half of the 20th
century.
The most convincing evidence of the unseen Zionist hand that wrote the Scofield notes
to the venerable King James Bible is the content of the notes themselves, for only
Zionists could have written them. These notes are the subject of this paper.
Oxford edited the former 1945 Edition of SRB in 1967, at the time of the Six Day War
when Israel occupied Palestine. The new footnotes to the King James Bible
presumptuously granted the rights to the Palestinians' land to the State of Israel and
specifically denied the Arab Palestinians any such rights at all. One of the most
brazen and outrageous of these NEWLY INSERTED footnotes states:
"FOR A NATION TO COMMIT THE SIN OF ANTI-SEMITISM BRINGS INEVITABLE JUDGMENT." (page
19-20, footnote (3) to Genesis 12:3.) (our emphasis added)
This statement sounds like something from Ariel Sharon, or the Chief Rabbi in Tel
Aviv, or Theodore Herzl, the founder of Modern Zionism. But these exact words are
found between the covers of the 1967 Edition of the Oxford Bible that is followed by
millions of American churchgoers and students and is used by their leaders as a source
for their preaching and teaching.
There is no word for "anti-Semitism" in the New Testament, nor is it found among the
Ten Commandments. "Sin," this writer was taught, is a personal concept. It is
something done by individuals in conflict with God's words, not by "nations." Even
Sodom did not sin--its people did. The word "judgment" in the Bible always refers to
God's action. In the Christian New Testament, Jesus promises both judgment and
salvation for believing individuals, not for "nations."
There was also no "State of Israel" when Scofield wrote his original notes in his
concocted Scofield Reference Bible in 1908. All references to Israel as a state were
added AFTER 1947, when Israel was granted statehood by edict of the United Nations.
The Oxford University Press simply rewrote its version of the Christian Bible in 1967
to make antipathy toward the "State of Israel" a "sin." Israel is made a god to be
worshiped, not merely a "state." David Ben-Gurion could not have written it better.
Perhaps he did write it!
The Oxford 1967 Edition continues on page 19:
"(2) GOD MADE AN UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE OF BLESSINGS THROUGH ABRAM'S SEED (a) TO THE
NATION OF ISRAEL TO INHERIT A SPECIFIC TERRITORY FOREVER"
"(3) THERE IS A PROMISE OF BLESSING UPON THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND NATIONS WHO BLESS
ABRAM'S DESCENDANTS, AND A CURSE LAID UPON THOSE WHO PERSECUTE THE JEWS." (Page 19,
1967 Edition Genesis 12:1-3)
This bequeath is joined to an Oxford prophesy that never occurs in the Bible itself:
"IT HAS INVARIABLY FARED ILL WITH THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PERSECUTED THE JEW, WELL WITH
THOSE WHO HAVE PROTECTED HIM." and "THE FUTURE WILL STILL MORE REMARKABLY PROVE THIS
PRINCIPLE"(footnote (3) bottom of page19-20Genesis 12:3)
None of these notes appeared in the original Scofield Reference Bible or in the 1917
or 1945 editions. The state of Israel DID NOT EXIST in 1945, and according to the
best dictionaries of the time, the word "Israel" only referred to a particular man and
an ancient tribe, which is consistent with the Bible text. See "Israel," Webster's
New International Dictionary 2nd (1950) Edition.
All of this language, including the prophecy about the future being really bad for
those who "persecute the Jews," reflects and furthers the goals of the Anti-Defamation
League, which has a stated goal of creating an environment where opposing the State of
Israel is considered "anti-Semitism," and "anti-Semitism" is a "hate crime" punishable
by law. This dream has become a reality in the Christian Zionist churches of America.
Only someone with these goals could have written this footnote.
The State of Israel's legal claims to Arab lands are based on the United Nations
Partitioning Agreement of 1947, which gave the Jews only a fraction of the land they
have since occupied by force. But when this author went to Israel and asked various
Israelis where they got the right to occupy Palestine, each invariably said words to
the effect that "God gave it to us." This interpretation of Hebrew scripture stems
from the book of Genesis and is called the "Abrahamic Covenant". It is repeated
several times and begins with God's promise to a man called Abraham who was eventually
to become the grandfather of a man called "Israel:"
"[2] AND I WILL MAKE OF THEE A GREAT NATION, AND I WILL BLESS THEE, AND MAKE THY NAME
GREAT; AND THOU SHALL BE A BLESSING:"
"[3] AND I WILL BLESS THEM THAT BLESS THEE, AND CURSE HIM THAT CURSETH THEE: AND IN
THEE SHALL ALL FAMILIES OF THE EARTH BE BLESSED." Genesis 12:3, King James Edition.
It is upon this promise to a single person that modern Israeli Zionists base their
claims to what amounts to the entire Mid-East. Its logic is roughly the equivalent of
someone claiming to be the heir to the John Paul Getty estate because the great man
had once sent a letter to someone's cousin seven times removed containing the
salutation "wishing you my very best." In "Sherry's War," We Hold These Truths
provides a common sense discussion of the Abrahamic Covenant and how millions of
Christians are taught to misunderstand it.
It is tempting to engage in academic arguments to show readers the lack of logic in
Scofield's theology, which has led followers of Christ so far astray. It seems all
too easy to refute the various Bible references given in support of Scofield's strange
writings. But we will resist the temptation to do this, because others have already
done it quite well, and more importantly because it leads us off our course.
It is also inviting to dig into Scofield's sordid past as Canfield has done, revealing
him to be a convicted felon and probable pathological liar, but we leave that to
others, because our interest is not in Scofield's life, but in saving the lives of
millions of innocent people who are threatened by the continuing Zionist push for
perpetual war.
Instead, we will examine the words on their face. The words in these 1967 footnotes
are Zionist propaganda that has been tacked onto the text of a Christian Bible. Most
of them make no sense, except to support the Zionist State of Israel in its war
against the Palestinians and any other wars it may enter into. In this purpose,
Zionism has completely succeeded. American Judeo-Christians, more recently labeled
"Christian Zionists," have remained mute during wars upon Israel's enemies in
Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and elsewhere. It is past time to stop the
spilling of more blood, some of it Christian blood.
Now, for evidence of the intent of the Zionists deception of Christians, let us
examine some Scofield's notes THAT HAVE BEEN ALTERED OR REMOVED by Oxford after his
death. In 1908 Scofield wrote in 1908:
"THE CONTRAST, 'I KNOW THAT YE ARE ABRAHAM'S SEED' - 'IF YE WERE ABRAHAM'S CHILDREN'
IS THAT BETWEEN THE NATURAL AND THE SPIRITUAL POSTERITY OF ABRAHAM. THE ISRAELITISH
PEOPLE AND ISHMAELITISH PEOPLE ARE THE FORMER; ALL WHO ARE 'OF THE PRECIOUS FAITH WITH
ABRAHAM,' WHETHER JEWS OR GENTILES, ARE THE LATTER (ROM 9, 6-8; GAL, 4-14. SEE
'ABRAHAMIC COVENANT' GEN 15, 18, NOTE)." ( Scofield's 1945 page 1127, note to John
8:39)
Compare that with the Oxford note substituted in the 1967 Edition:
"8:37 ALL JEWS ARE NATURAL DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM, BUT ARE NOT NECESSARILY HIS
SPIRITUAL POSTERITY, CP Rom 9-6-8, Gal 3: 6-14" (Note (1) P1136, Oxford 1967 Edition,
note to Jn 8:37.)
How, pray tell, can "all Jews" be "natural descendants of Abraham," a Chaldean who
lived some 3000 years ago? Persons of all races are Jews and new Jews are being
converted every day from every race. One might as well say all Lutherans are the
natural descendants of Martin Luther; or that all Baptists come from the loins of John
the Baptist. This note could only have been written by an Israeli patriot, for no one
else would have a vested interest in promoting this genetic nonsense. Shame on those
who accept this racism; it is apostate Christianity.
The original Scofield note was far out of line with traditional Christianity in 1908
and should have been treated as heresy then. Yet Scofield had failed to go far enough
for the Zionists. Scofield clearly recognized what the book of Genesis states, that
the sons of Ishmael are co-heirs to Abraham's ancient promise. Did not Scofield say
"the Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish people are...the natural posterity of
Abraham"? The Oxford Press simply waited for Scofield to die and changed it as they
wished.
And what is it that Scofield said that did not satisfy the Zionists who rewrote the
Oxford 1967 Edition?
The answer is an easy one. Most Arab and Islamic scholars consider Arabs in general
and the Prophet Mohamed in particular to be direct descendants of Ishmael, Abraham's
first son and older half-brother of Isaac, whose son Jacob was later to become known
as "Israel." Many Arabs believe that through Ishmael they are co-heirs of to
Abraham's promise, and they correctly believe that present-day Israelis have no
Biblical right to steal their land. Jewish Talmudic folklore also speaks of Ishmael,
so the Zionists apparently felt they had to alter how Christians viewed the two half
brothers in order to prevent Christians from siding with the Arabs over the land theft.
The Zionists solved this dilemma by inserting a senseless footnote in the 1967
(Oxford) Scofield Reference Bible which, in effect, substitutes the word "Jews" for
the words "The Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish people," as Scofield originally
wrote it. The Israelitish and Ishmaelitish people lived 3000 years ago, but the
Zionists want to claim the Arabs' part of the presumed birthright right now! Read it
again; "all Jews are natural descendants of Abraham, but are not necessarily his
spiritual posterity."
And there is more of such boondogglery in the Oxford bible. On the same page 1137 we
find yet another brand new Zionist-friendly note referring to the New Testament book
of John 8:37.
"(2) 8:44 THAT THIS SATANIC FATHERHOOD CANNOT BE LIMITED TO THE PHARISEES IS MADE
CLEAR IN 1Jn3:8-10" (note SRB 1967 Edition, P1137 to John 8:44)
Let us look at the verse Oxford is trying to soften, wherein Jesus is speaking
directly to the Pharisees, who were the Jewish leaders of his day, and to no one else:
"YE ARE OF YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL, AND THE LUST OF YOUR FATHER YE WILL DO. HE WAS A
MURDERER FROM THE BEGINNING, AND ABODE NOT IN THE TRUTH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH IN
HIM. WHEN HE SPEAKEST A LIE, HE SPEAKEST OF HIS OWN; FOR HE IS A LIAR, AND THE FATHER
OF IT." John 8:44 King James Ed.)
Those are plain words. No wonder the Zionists wanted to dilute what Jesus said. Not
only did Oxford add a new footnote in 1967, but they inserted no less than four
reference cues into the King James sacred text, directing readers to their specious,
apostate footnotes. It seems the Zionists cannot deny what Jesus said about
Pharisees, but they do not want to bear the burden of being "sons of Satan" all by
themselves. Now here's the text of the verse to which Oxford refers in order to try
to solve this problem:
"HE THAT COMMITETH SIN IS OF THE DEVIL; FOR THE DEVIL SINNETH FROM THE BEGINNING. FOR
THIS PURPOSE THE SON OF GOD WAS MANIFESTED, THAT HE MIGHT DESTROY THE WORK OF THE
DEVIL." (1Jn3:8.King James Edition)
Fine, but this verse, spoken by Jesus to His followers in a speech about avoiding sin,
in no way supports Oxford's argument that Jesus was not talking directly to and about
the Pharisee leaders when he called them "Sons of Satan" in John 8:44. It is a
different book written at a different time to a different audience. This is typical
Christian Zionist diversion.
To find out to whom Jesus is speaking you must read the rest of John 8, not something
from another book. Furthermore, John 8:44 is only one of some 77 verses where Jesus
confronted the Pharisees by name and in many cases addressed them as "satanic" and as
"vipers." Oxford simply ignores most of these denunciations by Jesus, adding no notes
at all, and the Christian Zionists go along without question.
These are a few examples of Zionist perversions of scripture that have shaped the
doctrine of America's most politically powerful religious subculture, the "Christian
Zionists" as Ariel Sharon calls them, or the dispensationalists, as intellectual
followers call themselves, or the Judeo-Christians as our politically-correct
politicians describe themselves. Today's Mid-East wars are not caused by the
predisposition of the peoples, who are no more warlike than any human tribes. Without
the pandering to Jewish and Zionist interests that is carried out by this
subculture--the most vocal being the celebrity Christian evangelists--there would be
no such wars, for there is not enough support for war outside of organized Zionist
Christianity.
Reverend Stephen Sizer of Christ Church,Christ Church Vicarage, Virginia Water, GU25
4LD, England
is perhaps the most dedicated new scholar writing about the Scofield Bible craze,
popularly known as Christian Zionism. He has quipped, "Judging Christianity by
looking at the American Evangelists is kind of like judging the British by watching
Benny Hill."
Reverend Sizer's remark brings to mind another Benny; his name is Benny Hinn, not a
British comic, but an American evangelist spouting inflammatory hate-filled words
aimed at Muslims everywhere. Hinn was speaking to the applause of an aroused crowd of
thousands in the American Airline Center in Dallas when he shocked two Ft. Worth Star
Telegram religious reporters covering the July 3d event by announcing, "We are on
God's side," speaking of Palestine. He shouted, "This is not a war between Jews and
Arabs. It is a war between God and the Devil." Lest there be any doubt about it,
Hinn was talking about a blood war in which the Israelis are "God" and the
Palestinians are "the Devil."
Benny Hinn is one of hundreds of acknowledged Christian Zionists who have no problem
spouting outright race hatred and who join in unconditional support for Israel without
regard for which or how many of Israel's enemies are killed or crippled. His boldness
stems from his knowledge that the vast majority of professing Christians from whom he
seeks his lavish support-the Judeo-Christians, or Christian Zionists--do not shrink at
his words, because they have been conditioned to accept them, just as Roman citizens
learned to accept Christian persecution, even burning alive, under Nero. Several
evangelists in attendance affirmed their agreement with Hinn - "the line between
Christians and Muslims is the difference between good and evil."
An amazing number of professing Christians are in agreement with the fanatical likes
of Hinn, including Gary Bauer, Ralph Reed, James Dobson and hundreds more. Yet Hinn's
profit-seeking fanaticism is not as shocking as that of men like Richard Land of the
Southern Baptist Convention who occupy the highest positions in the area of
conservative religious thought. Land may have stopped short of branding all Muslims
as devils, but he attacked their leader and Prophet and stated that, according to
Baptist Bible interpretation, the Palestinian people have no legal rights to property
in Palestine. See our discussion of Southern Baptists entitled "The Cause of the
Conflict: Fixing Blame."
The more politically conservative and libertarian the speaker expressing hatred for
Islam, the more shocking the statement sounds. One example is Samuel Blumenfeld, a
veteran textbook author and advocate of home education. His attack on Islam in a
story entitled "Religion and Satanism" in the April 2002 conservative, Calvinist
Chalcedon Report leaves little room for civil liberties and freedom of thought. He
writes, "Islam is a religion ruled by Satan," and asks, "Can anyone under the
influence of Satan be trusted?" Blumenfeld shows poor judgment and a lack of morality
when he allows phrases such as "willing agents of Satan," "another manifestation of
Satanism" and "the willingness of Muslims to believe blatant lies," to spill from his
pen.
How can anyone interpret these words by Land, Hinn, Blumenfeld, and yes, our own
President, as anything less than race hatred? Who would make such generalized and
transparently false statements against any other minority except Muslims?
About 100 million American Christians need to recover their true faith in Christ
Jesus, who never denounced any individual on account of his group. Jesus even tried
to save the Pharisees, and only denounced them when they showed themselves to be
deceivers. There is not a word in the New Testament that urges any follower of Jesus
to murder one child in Iraq or condemn Palestine to death. Race hatred is a Zionist,
not a Christian, strategy.
Christian Zionism may be the most bloodthirsty apostasy in the entire history of
Christianity or any other religion. Shame on its leaders: they have already brought
the blood of untold numbers innocent people down upon the spires and prayer benches of
America's churches.
WHTT asks every Christian to share this article with pastors and church leaders,
especially lay leaders. We ask every Muslim and Jew who reads it to do the same. You
might wish to suspend giving money to any organizations that preach Zionist race
hatred in any form, especially under the cover Jesus Christ. And lastly, We Hold
These Truths invites your informed comments and questions.
Listen to: Kulture Klash II, How Oxford University Press and CI Scofield stole the
Christian Bible, WHTT "Internet Talk Radio" - also available on tape.
Copyright 2002, may be reproduced in full with permission.
We Hold These Truths (WHTT)
P.O. Box 14491
Scottsdale, AZ 85267
480-947-3329
To subscribe, please type "Subscribe" in the SUBJECT LINE.
To withdraw, please type "Remove" in the SUBJECT LINE.
Resources:
The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield, hard cover, $30.00 ppd.
(limited availability).
Listen to: Kulture Klash I and II, Audio tape set, How Oxford University Press and
CI Scofield stole the Christian Bible. CE Carlson and WHTT Advisors: $15.00 ppd
Sherry's War: Twenty page research paper plus 1 hour audiotape by C. E. Carlson, - How
Judeo-Christians mix and match scripture verses and use of extra text out of context
to promote the Pop Church's "chosen people" and end times scenario. Sherry and many
other well-meaning, professed Christians have justified war against Arab people
without a scrap of scriptural support and with little knowledge of the conflict.
"Sherry's War" offers insight into current Christian sub-culture and why many have
justified or ignored the brutal assassinations of Islamic peoples simply because they
are not Israelis or Christian. An introduction to WHTT's classic 20-page study by the
same name; see Right To The Point Journal. Both $15.00 ppd.
The Final Apostasy - by Gordon Ginn Ph.D. Is your church apostate, would you know it
if it were? A book that reveals the untold historical and documented ex-post facto
changes made in the Hebrew text of the Old Testament...after Christ. These changes
have affected what all of us believe, from the Reformation to Day911. Ginn sheds
light on the turmoil in the Middle East and reveals the results of some Christians'
tragic errors in accepting the "Final Apostasy". 218 pages $20.ppd.
All of the above items at one time $70.00 (call or mail for now, please.)
We Hold These Truths
P.O. Box 14491
Scottsdale, AZ 85267
480-947-3329
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
