--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today's commentary:
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2002-09/06pilger.cfm
==================================
ZNet Commentary
Remembering 9/11 September 06, 2002
By John Pilger
Remembering 11 September merely as gruesome spectacle is an insult to
the victims of that epic crime. However, remembering is important in
order to make sense of it, and especially of what happened next.
Most of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, a US protectorate.
Saudi Arabia is the home of the Bin Laden family, who were clients of
George Bush Sr in his capacity as consultant for the huge Carlyle
Group, which has extensive oil interests. Oil and America's struggle
to defeat the Soviet Union were at the heart of it.
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were the bases of the CIA's Operation
Cyclone, which, with a treasury of $4bn and the secret approval of
the White House, effectively created the Islamicist war party that
attacked America. This terrorist movement, the mujahedin, was the
weapon America wielded against the Soviet Union; the Islamicist gene
kept emerging and growing in direct proportion to the spread of
American influence and pressure in the region. The rise of the
Taliban was a direct result.
Saudi Arabia, home of Islam's holiest place, became a vast American
base during the assault on Iraq in 1990-91, which was represented to
the west by President Bush Senior as "the greatest moral campaign
since World War Two". The unadvertised goal of this "war" was the
consolidation of American power in the oilfields and
the "containment" of an Iraq whose cheap, high-quality oil posed a
threat to the price of Saudi oil. The "greatest moral campaign" of
liberating Kuwait had precious little to do with it.
Al-Qaeda took root in Saudi Arabia among those of the ruling families
who opposed the Fahd family's deals with the United States, which
they saw as a Faustian pact. "The day the bubble burst" is how many
in the Arab world who understood these tensions describe 11 September.
Run by rich and powerful men, al-Qaeda drew on the Arab world's
bitterness at America's underwriting of Israel; and this, in a
broader sense, was shared across the world, in varying degrees, by
those who had long felt the imperial boot of the west. In his 1961
classic The Wretched of the Earth, Frantz Fanon accurately predicted
this reaping of a whirlwind sewn by colonialism.
None of this lessened the shock of 11 September. The first response
of people everywhere was a humane one; those in the twin towers were
innocently going about mostly ordinary jobs. This almost universal
sympathy was appropriated by Bush and Blair; the pursuit of justice
was wrapped in the banner of a corrupt imperial power, whose
subsequent actions ought to be as infamous as the crime itself.
Although the scale of suffering is beyond comparison, there are
similarities with the appropriation of the Holocaust as an enduring
justification for the injustice and crimes committed in Palestine. It
will be no less a profanity if "9/11" is awarded that currency in our
consciousness.
The combined forces of the supercult of Americanism - from the
Washington fundamentalists themselves to the unctuous reporters
standing in front of the White House - want us to believe that the
events on that day "changed the world", providing an appendix to
Francis Fukuyama's scam about the end of history.
The world did not change. The thrust of American military and
economic power merely accelerated, along with the assault on social
democracy. And just as Fukuyama's nonsense has been discredited, so
will 11 September as another "end of history". For what has happened
in the past year is an awakening across the world to the true
rapacity of dominant American power. It is the opposite of what the
propagandists wish; or as John Berger once wrote: "Never again will a
single story be told as though it's the only one."
The press windbags who call for the incineration of innocent people
in Iraq (whom they smear, collectively, as Saddam Hussein) speak to
each other as if from unattended platforms at Hyde Park Corner on a
grim winter's day. Every indication is that the majority of people in
this country and around the world are not listening, and are fed up
with the American drumbeat.
Edward Said once described the extraordinary power of Frantz Fanon's
writing as "a surreptitious counter-narrative to the above-ground
force of the colonial regime". That same extraordinary power is
emerging in many countries, on every continent, not least those the
western media has struck from the map. It is cause, I believe, for
optimism.
Bush's and Blair's reaction to 11 September was understood quickly.
As far back as October, Gallup International reported that a majority
in more than 30 countries opposed military solutions. Tony Blair had
no mandate to send the marines on their vacuous expedition, chasing
tribesmen in the manner of 150 years ago. Today, a clear majority of
the British public oppose his unexplained plans to join an American
invasion of Iraq, a country which American propagandists, without
evidence, associate with the failed "war on terrorism".
Add the proviso that uncertain numbers of Americans might be killed
storming Baghdad, a slim majority of people in the United States are
also against an invasion, which is both heartening and remarkable,
given the festival of paranoia since 11 September.
The truth is that the Bush gang and its adjutants, Ariel Sharon and
Blair (and the barely acknowledged, though keener-than-thou John
Howard in Australia), are isolated. Television's age of passivity is
passing. Public meetings draw thousands, mostly by word of mouth. In
the US, the great resistance historian Howard Zinn watches his e-mail
traffic as it records countless protests in small towns, defying the
stereotype.
Perhaps what is stirring in America, beneath the weight of its myths
of exceptionalism, moralism and what the cold war planner George
Kennan cynically called its "Rotary Club idealism", is the faint
beginning of a rejection, of the kind and magnitude that led to the
great civil and human rights movements. Never have ordinary Americans
seemed as cynical about the greed and corruption of their rulers.
This must not be overstated, but under any regime and in any
circumstances, and in spite of the propaganda of their accredited
guardians, people are never still. The specious morality play spun by
Blair has had the reverse effect. What mainstream commentators
called "the public unease" can be traced to Blair's ringing call for
Gladstonian and actual gunboats in tune with Bush's evocation of the
American Wild West where, as D H Lawrence pointed out, the heroes
were simply killers.
A silence has broken since 11 September. International hostility to
the Bush gang's violence (in Afghanistan, a University of New
Hampshire study estimates, up to 5,000 people were bombed to death)
probably would have happened anyway; but their abuse of the great
tragedy of 11 September has been the marker. That is what has changed.
In Britain, the media dam has sprung dangerous leaks. A popular
tabloid, the Daily Mirror, has turned back to its serious, dissenting
roots and caused such elitist fear and loathing that one of its
American owners has made veiled threats, and that hagiographer of
Washington, Whitehall and Murdoch, William Shawcross, has commanded a
page in the Guardian from which to condemn the "infantile" Mirror and
pretty well anybody else who dares question our government's
obeisance to Bush's lawlessness.
Washington's courtiers, or "Atlanticists", as they like to be known,
are worried; the once reliable censorship-by-omission that allowed
the British state to join America's imperial adventures, notably the
one-sided slaughter in the Gulf in 1991, the most "covered" event in
history and the least reported, is no longer fully operational. In
the Mirror, on the Guardian's main opinion pages, in this journal, in
the reporting of Robert Fisk in the Independent and here and there on
radio, dissent - the lifeblood of any free society - has been heard.
On the internet, there is now the equivalent of a robust samizdat:
for example, the excellent www.medialens.com and www.zmag.org.
Only television has been muted. The stamina of BBC mythology about
its "objectivity" and devotion to "balance" ought not be
underestimated. Much of the rest of humanity continues to be
objectified in degrees of their value to the west and incorporation
into western cultural slogans. As Fanon wrote more than 40 years
ago: "For the native, objectivity is always directed against him."
Thus, the BBC's Newsnight can "balance" justice and injustice, facts
and vested lies, while reducing whole societies to the sum of their
dictators' demonology. When will those charged with training future
broadcasters begin to alert their young hopefuls to the
sophistication of our own state propaganda?
Making sense of 11 September is urgent. Another crime is imminent. In
1998, the Pentagon warned Bill Clinton that the "collateral damage"
of an all-out invasion of Iraq could be as high as 10,000 civilians.
How often, routinely, does humanity have to suffer this? That is the
question many now ask. When the correspondent of the Washington Post,
a famous liberal news-paper, can say on the BBC that the British are
speaking out against the war party because they are jealous of
America having "the sun around which the rest of the world revolves"
(words to that effect) then you appreciate how the elite of great
power thinks. The Romans and the imperial British would have thought
like this. But the 21st century has arrived and the respectability
that Nazism finally stripped from imperialism ought not to be allowed
to return.
John Pilger's documentary, Palestine Is Still the Issue, will be
shown on ITV at 11pm on Monday 16 September
--- End forwarded message ---
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
