-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded message follows -------
To:                     - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From:                   Lord Apometron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                SNET: *QUESTIONS THAT WON'T BE ASKED ABOUT IRAQ*
Date sent:              Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:34:37 -0300 (ADT)
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]


http://www.angelfire.com/d20/philadelphians/rpquest.html


    *QUESTIONS THAT WON'T BE ASKED ABOUT IRAQ*

*Congressman Ron Paul
U.S. House of Representatives
September 10, 2002 *

*Soon we hope to have hearings on the pending war with Iraq. I am
concerned there are some questions that won?t be asked- and maybe will
not even be allowed to be asked. Here are some questions I would like
answered by those who are urging us to start this war.*

*1. Is it not true that the reason we did not bomb the Soviet Union at
the height of the Cold War was because we knew they could retaliate?*

*2. Is it not also true that we are willing to bomb Iraq now because we
know it cannot retaliate- which just confirms that there is no real threat?*

*3. Is it not true that those who argue that even with inspections we
cannot be sure that Hussein might be hiding weapons, at the same time
imply that we can be more sure that weapons exist in the absence of
inspections?*

*4. Is it not true that the UN?s International Atomic Energy Agency was
able to complete its yearly verification mission to Iraq just this year
with Iraqi cooperation?*

*5. Is it not true that the intelligence community has been unable to
develop a case tying Iraq to global terrorism at all, much less the
attacks on the United States last year? Does anyone remember that 15 of
the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia and that none came from Iraq?*

*6. Was former CIA counter-terrorism chief Vincent Cannistraro wrong
when he recently said there is no confirmed evidence of Iraq?s links to
terrorism?*

*7. Is it not true that the CIA has concluded there is no evidence that
a Prague meeting between 9/11 hijacker Atta and Iraqi intelligence took
place?*

*8. Is it not true that northern Iraq, where the administration claimed
al-Qaeda were hiding out, is in the control of our "allies," the Kurds?*

*9. Is it not true that the vast majority of al-Qaeda leaders who
escaped appear to have safely made their way to Pakistan, another of our
so-called allies?*

*10. Has anyone noticed that Afghanistan is rapidly sinking into total
chaos, with bombings and assassinations becoming daily occurrences; and
that according to a recent UN report the al-Qaeda "is, by all accounts,
alive and well and poised to strike again, how, when, and where it chooses"*

*11. Why are we taking precious military and intelligence resources away
from tracking down those who did attack the United States- and who may
again attack the United States- and using them to invade countries that
have not attacked the United States? *

*12. Would an attack on Iraq not just confirm the Arab world's worst
suspicions about the US-and isn't this what bin Laden wanted? 13. How
can Hussein be compared to Hitler when he has no navy or air force, and
now has an army 1/5 the size of twelve years ago, which even then proved
totally inept at defending the country? *

*14. Is it not true that the constitutional power to declare war is
exclusively that of the Congress? Should presidents, contrary to the
Constitution, allow Congress to concur only when pressured by public
opinion? Are presidents permitted to rely on the UN for permission to go
to war?*

*15. Are you aware of a Pentagon report studying charges that thousands
of Kurds in one village were gassed by the Iraqis, which found no
conclusive evidence that Iraq was responsible, that Iran occupied the
very city involved, and that evidence indicated the type of gas used was
more likely controlled by Iran not Iraq?*

*16. Is it not true that anywhere between 100,000 and 300,000 US
soldiers have suffered from Persian Gulf War syndrome from the first
Gulf War, and that thousands may have died?*

*17. Are we prepared for possibly thousands of American casualties in a
war against a country that does not have the capacity to attack the
United States?*

*18. Are we willing to bear the economic burden of a 100 billion dollar
war against Iraq, with oil prices expected to skyrocket and further
rattle an already shaky American economy? How about an estimated 30
years occupation of Iraq that some have deemed necessary to "build
democracy" there?*

*19. Iraq?s alleged violations of UN resolutions are given as reason to
initiate an attack, yet is it not true that hundreds of UN Resolutions
have been ignored by various countries without penalty?*

*20. Did former President Bush not cite the UN Resolution of 1990 as the
reason he could not march into Baghdad, while supporters of a new attack
assert that it is the very reason we can march into Baghdad?*

*21. Is it not true that, contrary to current claims, the no-fly zones
were set up by Britain and the United States without specific approval
from the United Nations?*

*22. If we claim membership in the international community and conform
to its rules only when it pleases us, does this not serve to undermine
our position, directing animosity toward us by both friend and foe?*

*23. How can our declared goal of bringing democracy to Iraq be
believable when we prop up dictators throughout the Middle East and
support military tyrants like Musharaf in Pakistan, who overthrew a
democratically-elected president? *

*24. Are you familiar with the 1994 Senate Hearings that revealed the
U.S. knowingly supplied chemical and biological materials to Iraq during
the Iran-Iraq war and as late as 1992- including after the alleged Iraqi
gas attack on a Kurdish village?*

*25. Did we not assist Saddam Hussein?s rise to power by supporting and
encouraging his invasion of Iran? Is it honest to criticize Saddam now
for his invasion of Iran, which at the time we actively supported?*

*26. Is it not true that preventive war is synonymous with an act of
aggression, and has never been considered a moral or legitimate US policy?*

*27. Why do the oil company executives strongly support this war if oil
is not the real reason we plan to take over Iraq?*

*28. Why is it that those who never wore a uniform and are confident
that they won?t have to personally fight this war are more anxious for
this war than our generals?*

*29. What is the moral argument for attacking a nation that has not
initiated aggression against us, and could not if it wanted?*

*30. Where does the Constitution grant us permission to wage war for any
reason other than self-defense?*

*31. Is it not true that a war against Iraq rejects the sentiments of
the time-honored Treaty of Westphalia, nearly 400 years ago, that
countries should never go into another for the purpose of regime change?*

*32. Is it not true that the more civilized a society is, the less
likely disagreements will be settled by war?*

*33. Is it not true that since World War II Congress has not declared
war and- not coincidentally- we have not since then had a clear-cut
victory?*

*34. Is it not true that Pakistan, especially through its intelligence
services, was an active supporter and key organizer of the Taliban?*

*35. Why don't those who want war bring a formal declaration of war
resolution to the floor of Congress? *

**** Not only is Ron Paul right as usual. He is one of the few who has
the honesty and integrity to be a representative in Congress. In
addition to these pertainent questions which must be asked, is the fact
daddy Bush covertly supported Iraq gas and bomb Iran and Israel, so if
there were any weapons from 1990-1998 found by UNSCOM Inspectors, they
were provided by the US. The pre-emptive strike is based upon President
Bush and Vice-President Cheney?s beliefs that there must be an invasion
of Iraq because Saddam Hussein: 1. possesses weapons of mass destruction
and the potential for nuclear weapons, 2. used these weapons on his own
people (Kurds) and the Iranians, 3. has a history of lying to the world.
According to information obtained by the AGWVA, there is irrefutable
evidence to show that the Unites States government provided and
encouraged Iraq?s use of chemical weapons. The United States Department
of Commerce and The American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) provided at
least 80 shipments of biological agents that were not attenuated (or
weakened) and were capable of reproduction. These shipments included
such virulent agents as Anthrax, West Nile Virus and Clostridium
botulinum (S.R.103-900, May 25, 1994, pg. 264). Iraq had long been
trying to acquire greater access to the Persian Gulf, and felt limited
confined a narrow strip of land along Kuwait's northern border, which
placed Iraqi interests in close proximity with hostile Iran. George
Bush, who had been covertly arming Iraq during its war with Iran, sent
word via April Glaspie
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/april.html> that the United
States would not intervene if Saddam Hussein grabbed a larger part of
Kuwait. SADDAM FELL FOR THE BAIT AND INVADED KUWAIT, THEN LATER ATTACKED
ISRAEL WITH WEAPONS WE PROVIDED HIM. This started Gulf War 1 -- now Bush
Jr. wants to start Gulf War 2, possibly leading to WW3 with the same
hypocrisy. *

*APRIL GLASPIE TRANSCRIPT:
I will be sending out a missive with details. What corruption! If people
only really knew and understood. *

------- End of forwarded message -------
Steve Wingate, Webmaster
ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com
Latest Update: Cydonia in 3-D
http://www.anomalous-images.com/Odyssey/Cydonia_3-d.html

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to