-Caveat Lector-

Nobel Committee Honors Carter, Disses Bush

By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
October 11, 2002

Friday's announcement that former U.S. President Jimmy Carter will receive
this year's Nobel Peace Prize represents a pointed challenge to the
unilateralist foreign policy advocated by rightwing hawks in the Bush
administration.

While the announcement itself cited Carter's "vital contribution" to the Camp
David peace agreement between Israel and Egypt -- one of the stellar
achievements of Carter's four-year tenure (1977-1981) -- as well as his
subsequent peace-making and human rights activities, the criticism of the
Bush regime was implicit in its wording.

Reading out the announcement written by the five-person Nobel Committee,
Norwegian Prime Minister Kjell Magne Bondevik said, "In a situation currently
marked by threats of the use of power, Carter has stood by the principles
that conflicts must as far as possible be resolved through mediation and
international co-operation based on international law, respect for human
rights, and economic development."

But the chairman of the Nobel Committee, Gunnar Berge, was far more direct in
his statements to the press. He said the award "should be interpreted as a
criticism of the line that the current administration has taken. It's a kick
in the leg to all that follow the same line as the United States."

An Outspoken Critic

Over the past year, the former president has emerged as one of the most
articulate and eloquent critics of the ultra-rightwing trend in U.S. foreign
policy. He has publicly assailed a wide array of Bush policies, including the
planned war on Iraq, handling of the Middle East crisis, relations with Cuba
and its failure to provide substantially increased aid to combat the HIV/AIDS
epidemic in Africa.

In a Sept. 5 Washington Post article, �The Troubling New Face of America,�
Carter took aim at Vice-President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld, accusing them of leading a "core group of conservatives who are
trying to realize pent-up ambitions under the cover of the proclaimed war
against terrorism." In the same article, he also flatly rejected the Cheney-
Rumsfeld push to launch a unilateral war with Iraq.

The article was a detailed indictment of the administration's record:
"Peremptory rejections of nuclear arms agreements, the biological weapons
convention, environmental protection, anti-torture proposals, and punishment
of war criminals have sometimes been combined with economic threats against
those who might disagree with us."

"Belligerent and divisive voices now seem to be dominant in Washington,"
Carter wrote. "It is crucial that the historical and well-founded American
commitments prevail: to peace, justice, human rights, the environment and
international co-operation."

Carter's most significant accomplishments as a president built on these same
principles. His major foreign policy achievements included the Camp David
agreement of 1978, the ratification of the Panama Canal Treaty, the
establishment of full diplomatic relations with China, and a major nuclear
arms agreement with the Soviet Union. He is perhaps best remembered, however,
for his championship of human rights, especially in Latin America, as well as
his denunciation of Washington's "inordinate fear of communism."

After retirement, Carter threw himself into international diplomacy and
humanitarian work, mostly organized through the Carter Center, which he and
his wife Rosalynn founded in 1982. In some cases, his mediation efforts were
supported by the U.S. government, as when he and the current secretary of
state, Colin Powell, helped arrange the peaceful intervention of U.S. troops
into Haiti to restore President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in 1994. In other
cases, such as his dramatic trip that same year to Pyongyang to defuse a
major crisis between the U.S. and North Korea over nuclear inspections,
government officials saw him as meddlesome, even as they later built on the
progress and trust he had established.

Israel and Palestine

In his public writings over the past year, Carter has become increasingly
outspoken against Bush's unqualified support for Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon. In a column last April, he called for withholding aid to Israel if
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon did not withdraw his troops from West
Bank towns and charged that Sharon's "ultimate goals" were "to establish
Israeli settlement as widely as possible throughout the occupied territories
and to deny Palestinians a cohesive political existence." Carter strongly
deplored Bush's alignment behind Sharon in June, and attacked Rumsfeld, in
particular, for undermining Bush's own commitments to a Palestinian state
when he referred to the "so-called occupation" and predicted there would
eventually emerge within his lifetime "some sort of (Palestinian) entity."

Like Colin Powell, whom he has publicly supported, Carter is in favor of
returning the United States to a true mediation role whose ultimate aim
should be the implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions that require
the exchange of "land for peace." He said Bush's Middle East policy
"indicates a radical departure from policies of every administration since
1967, always based on the withdrawal of Israel from occupied territories and
a genuine peace between Israelis and their neighbors," Carter noted.

Cuba and Castro

Carter has also not been afraid to challenge the Bush administration on its
Cuba policy. In May, he became the first former American president to visit
the island since the Revolution, not only calling for an end to the embargo
but also contradicting statements by Under Secretary of State for Arms
Control and International Strategy John Bolton that Cuba may possess a
biological weapons program. He told reporters none of the briefings he had
received from the administration before his trip contained any mention of
such concerns.

The White House seemed flustered by the announcement of the Nobel award and
at press time, had yet to issue a formal statement. "We don't know if we'll
have anything to say on it," a press officer told AlterNet, "and if we do, it
will probably be later this afternoon."

Bush did call his predecessor to congratulate him and the two spoke for a few
minutes.

"It was a friendly conversation," said White House press secretary Ari
Fleischer, when asked by reporters. But he declined to respond to prize
committee chairman Berge's statement. "The president thinks this is a great
day for Jimmy Carter and that's what he's going to focus on," he said.

Carter has also declined to comment on the implied criticism of the Bush
administration's handling of the crisis with Iraq. "I hope this award
reflects a universal acceptance and even embrace of this broad-based concept
of human rights," he said. But in a CNN interview on Larry King, he clearly
stated that he would have voted no on Thursday's congressional resolution
allowing the president to use force against Iraq.

Few doubt that Carter will soon be using his renewed celebrity to press his
case against the excesses of the uber-hawks. And many around the world would
certainly want him to do just that.

"I think the world will generally accept this award as being a very positive
sign from the rest of the world about how we would like to see the U.S.
behave in world affairs," noted Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Bill
Graham.


Steve Wingate, Webmaster
ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com
Latest Update: Cydonia in 3-D
http://www.anomalous-images.com/Odyssey/Cydonia_3-d.html

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to